M
You know what through Steve, I have heard Christian Theologians from US Christian Universties, aside from Catholics/Mormons speak on this. The book of Genesis and the seperation of chaper one and two is their point of contention.It seems that at the heart of the differences between many Mormon and traditional Christian beliefs lies the doctrine of pre-mortal existence
Lets look at it in context. Solomon is speaking of his relationship with the Wisdom of God. The entire book is about him speaking of God’s Wisdom by personifying it, as if it were a woman. It was one of God’s greatest gifts to him.Hi everyone,
This thread was begun by someone asking if there was biblical support for the idea of the pre-mortal existence of souls. Does the Catholic Bible count?
Wisdom of Solomon 8 :19
“As a child I was by nature well endowed, and a good soul fell to my lot; or rather, being good, I entered an undefiled body.”
Could you please provide references for those things you’ve read, BTW I doubt they were Catholic. I also feel it’s a shame you don’t include books like Wisdom, it’s very sad the LDS discount such books, though of course you may make that free will choice.Hi Lori and Kathleen,
I’ve read a number of scholarly commentaries (don’t remember if they were Catholic scholars) about this passage, and it is very commonly inferred that this passage was talking about premortal existence. So whether or not you think the passage means something else, it’s not just me interpreting that passage this way, and it’s not just Mormons.
And BTW, Mormons believe books like Wisdom were inspired, but somewhat corrupted, so we don’t feel the need to include them in our canon.
Hi, BDawg,Hi Lori and Kathleen,
I’ve read a number of scholarly commentaries (don’t remember if they were Catholic scholars) about this passage, and it is very commonly inferred that this passage was talking about premortal existence. So whether or not you think the passage means something else, it’s not just me interpreting that passage this way, and it’s not just Mormons.
And BTW, Mormons believe books like Wisdom were inspired, but somewhat corrupted, so we don’t feel the need to include them in our canon.
Thank you, Kathleen. I try.Telstar…
Thanks for your post…you do good…I have found Mormons jump on a few phrases of Catholic writings…and ignore everything else that is written, taking the piece out of context, then saying Catholic sources are even admitting Mormon beliefs…when in reality…to the contrary…which explains why I am rather ‘pooped out’ going into alot of depth with Mormonism.
No, sorry, Dawg…over and over and over…the great given to Solomon was Wisdom…nothing greater one could ask for…
Wisdom is a much more profound virtue to pray for than to want to become some kind of god.
That’s only a thesis that was written by a student at the university, that probably reflects his own personal views. There’s no way of telling what his personal religious background is, because you certainly don’t have to be Catholic to attend Catholic University. You’d have to find something a little more convincing as coming from the solid Catholic theological perspective. From the references, it seems that his opinion is that the book of Wisdom shows some Hellenistic tendencies in belief, which (I think) is not part of Catholic belief.BTW, you can find Catholic scholars who will admit Wisdom 8:19 is talking about pre-existence of souls. E.g., John J. Collins, and here’s a doctoral dissertation from the Catholic University of America:
aladinrc.wrlc.org/bitstream/1961/9192/1/Glicksman_cua_0043A_10055display.pdf
(Search for “8:19” in the document.)
Anyway, the Catholic scholars I’ve seen admitting this usually go on to say they think the idea was adopted from Plato, rather than the earlier Hebrews, so I don’t want you to think I’m trying to say that these Catholic scholars are unreservedly promoting the Mormon view. I’m just saying that they read this particular passage like I do. (I.e., they take it at face value.)
Yes, the human aspect of me had a beginning when God created it.You as a human have always had a beginning,whether it is in space,time and matter or in the spiritual world. Again,for you to claim who have ALWAYS existed makes you are Eternal and you are NOT Eternal. That makes us co-Eternal with God. Your theology is wacked my friend.
You are making yoursefl out to be a mini-god and that is heresy.
Pre mortal existance shows these creatures are masters of their own destiny…deciding whether or not they want to be born. So they are the creators of their own existence…already semi-gods…
You are applying your (Catholic) understanding of the theology to our teaching: is it any surprise, then, that you find a disconnect? This is why I asked for your specific definition of ‘eternal’; because it is becoming more clear that you attach more to the word than simply existing forever both in the past and future. This is all that we mean by the fact that we are co-eternal with God: that we have existed in one way or another for all time that has gone, and will exist of all time to come. Some LDS members are of the belief that as spirits we may have had some (name removed by moderator)ut in discussing with God what would happen to us here on an individual level: choosing our parents for example - but as far as I know this is not doctrine, I have never heard it taught. We do not claim to be anything comparable to God.No creature that has ever existed is comparable to God, in any way, shape or form.
He must have ordered from one of the adverts,Meier on TV, or on the website. These are intended for those interested in learning more: and the missionaries are called to help with just that.That wasn’t the experience of another poster that ordered a BoM, just to read it, and it showed up on his doorstep in the hands of an LDS missionary.
Naturally we both think this: and I sometimes think that some on this forum would do well to remember that I hold my beliefs in the same esteem and with the same confidence and conviction as you do.But, only one of our statements can be true. We probably both think it’s ours. I’ll stick with the one that has historical evidence behind it, that really hasn’t changed much for 2000 years.
“Staring at each other, across the neutral zone!”
Just a little :doh2:I’m guessing the above statement is an indication of the fingers not listening to the brain.
He was baptised by full immersion and called all to follow His example. Where, then, does He say anything else is OK?:ehh: Really? Where does Jesus and the 12 teach baptism is ONLY valid by immersion?
Actually, all any of the Biblical references to the nature of God is state one of a handful of things: that He is he same yesterday, today and forever - in which case what about the day before yesterday, or last week? That he is the same from eternity to eternity - we lived with Him in eternity before our mortal birth, and will do in eternity afterwards: but what about the eternities before and after this? Eternity can also be used to refer to the state or place in which we existed with God (I.e. with the Eternal One) not just to an infinite span of time. Sometimes the scriptures describe Him as unchanging, forever the same, I Am; each of these indicates hat He is not changing - they are all present tense - and say nothing about Him before now.The name of God is “I Am Who Am”…transcendant of time and human events…God never changes and is always present…
Lets look at it in context.
And I was a witty child and had received a good soul. [20] And whereas I was more good, I came to a body undefiled.
uscc.org: Wisdom 8:
Wherever it is taken from, this section still refers to why Solomon believes he makes good company to wisdom. It is because being well favoured (of God), and that the nature from which he came was noble, he was placed into a body free from defections (genetic disorders, blindness, deafness etc for example). For there to be any relevance to why he would be deemed worthy (the only reasonable reason for the use of ‘attain’ - some kind of personal deeds went into it) to receive an unblemished body, indicates that there must have been some time, some kind of existence for him, before he had attained it.19
- Now, I was a well-favored child,
and I came by a noble nature;
20
or rather, being noble, I attained an unblemished body.
This is further backed up by the common Jewish belief that disease and disorders were an outward sign of sin. When Jesus was asked about the blind man they wanted to know who had sinned, the man himself or his parents, to cause him to be born blind. For there to even be any question over this matter, some understanding of a period of existence prior to the man’s mortal birth must be known.
Except that we do not believe that the canon of scripture is all that exists which is good, correct and beneficial to edify and uplift.It’s too bad King James decided to throw Wisdom out with the bath water, eh?
We are all born with a ‘‘spirit’’ body and soul. Its the Spirit=Neos our own spirit that might have pre-existed.Nope; Scripture states that God “forms the spirit of man within him”, that is, within the body.
In 1 Corinthians, S. Paul states the “natural” comes first; then the spiritual. There is no spiritual life prior to the natural life; the body comes first.
Apart from the Book of Mormon, there is no support for a human being’s premortal existence.
ICXC NIKA