Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Again,

Today in Both Things Are True:

Comey is sanctimonious and at times insufferable. He’s wrong about many things, and made big mistakes while leading the FBI.

By orders of magnitude, he still has more integrity and credibility, and is a better human being than Donald Trump.
Just because you SAY it doesn’t make it true…
 
It really doesn’t occur to you that maybe people think that no one, including the President of the United States, is above the law and hence, given the evidence of wrongdoing near this administration, an investigation is warranted.
But only if it’s a republican, right? because there was plenty evidence of wrongdoing near other administrations that never warranted an investigation… right?
 
Mr. Comey went to the President with unverified reports KNOWING they were politically funded by opposition persons. Knowing and then the fact that Comey brought it up with DT was leaked to the media and then the media leaked the WHOLE dossier to the public.
Of course it is right. Keeping the President in the dark about this would have been wrong.
 
As far as Trump’s people breaking federal laws because of lying to the feds, one has to wonder why they all lie and commit felonies. Do they not have attorneys that tell them that lying is a federal offense? Are they all that stupid? It’s a mystery to me.
Evidently it isn’t a crime to lie any more… Just saying…
 
Why keep the president in the dark about where the document originated??? Is telling half truths the same as lying? I saw (and heard) that omitting information is legal malfeasance especially if it shows an exculpatory fact… **I have no idea what I just said but hope you understand my question.
And I’m sorry for questioning your Comey trip to Russia. I’m getting a late start at reading the thread… Sorry, again…
 
Why keep the president in the dark about where the document originated??? Is telling half truths the same as lying? I saw (and heard) that omitting information is legal malfeasance especially if it shows an exculpatory fact…
I am not sure that he did keep him in the dark. I think, but am not positive, that he made it clear that it was out there and was coming from political opponents and was in the media.
Good thing to look at.
 
Do you remember James telling all of America that Hilary lied when she said she turned over all her work related e-mails? Sorry for using Hilary… just one example that comes to mind. And remember Bill saying … oh, never mind. It’s a Democrat thing, I guess.
 
Another lie from Breitbart. The Breitbart story failed to document that James Comey’s brother was involved in (or had any tangible connection to) DLA Piper’s independent audit of the Clinton Foundation
 
👍 and this just gets me… Mr. Comey went to the President with unverified reports KNOWING they were politically funded by opposition persons. Knowing and then the fact that Comey brought it up with DT was leaked to the media and then the media leaked the WHOLE dossier to the public.

Now I don’t care if you are conservative, liberal or liberitarian… That ain’t right… At best that is POLITICAL, which the FBI should NOT be… Agreed???
it was a set up to give i a veneer of authenticity
 
Top layer at FBI worked overtime to railroad Trump and deny him intelligence information.
 
Well, if everything had been turned over, they wouldn’t have found files on Weiner’s PC.
Are you suggesting that she knew of the files on Weiner’s PC, or are you altering the meaning of lying?
 
Well, I don’t care what Dershowitz has to say and you have given me no reason to care.
So you endorse the unethical and possibly illegal behavior of McCabe, the leaking and attempt to manipulate both parties by Comey, the conspiracy of McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr and possibly Rosenstein, to use the prosecutorial powers of the government to pursue political ends. And you endorse laying “perjury traps” by prosecutors with unlimited budgets and unlimited powers.

You really shouldn’t.
 
Maybe it’s just incompetence, or her staff lying to her.
People know what PC’s they’ve used for work.
 
Maybe it’s just incompetence, or her staff lying to her.

People know what PC’s they’ve used for work.
We are talking about Hillary knowing about what was on Weiner’s PC. Do you know if any of your emails to co-workers have made it to the computers of their spouses?
 
Last edited:
They weren’t supposed to have anything, and the claim was they hadn’t found anything new and pertinent, not that they had all the files.

So your line is that Hillary and/or her legal team were gross incompetent.
 
You don’t get to ‘blame the dog’
You are responsible for what you did with govt documents.

The wife put the files on the PC and was responsible for taking them off.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top