Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Says the head of the FBI who never conducted an inquiry… at least not official like he would other suspects. And made deals with the Clinton team to let them destroy evidence… and then said she was guilty but no one would prosecute her… Why do we have to rehash this stuff. Just because you guys and gals? didn’t listen? He was testifying under oath.
** Oh, I’m so sorry. Really many of you probably work and I’m retired. Really, sorry!
 
Probably IMHO the main reason the FBI did not want to bring charges against HRC, the Republican FBI Director COMEY would have had to bring the exact same charges against 2 of it’s own, namely Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice.
No, it would have to go all the way to the TOP and No one would want to accuse or charge the President (BO) of the United States with corruption at the highest level…
AND Condi and Colin did not have private servers… everybody had alternate e-mail addresses but they were still on the gov. server…
 
Last edited:
From what I have heard that is exactly how the FBI works. You make a statement and it turns out to be incorrect… Lying to the FBI==Bingo you go to jail.
 
I got this from CBS.com. very reputable, correct?

When asked if Clinton broke the law, Comey said that his judgment was that there was not enough evidence to “establish beyond a reasonable doubt” that Clinton did so. But Comey also reiterated that he would go as far as to fire someone in the FBI’s employ who handled classified information the way the Clinton team did.

Responding to a rapid-fire series of questions, Comey testified that several Clinton statements on her email server use – including her use of just one device to email – were untrue.

Untrue=not true=lie
This is from Comey’s direct testimony.
 
Last edited:
Do you thing crossing your fingers also makes something you say not really a lie?
 
No. I think some of them conspired together, but I do not represent that all of the bad actors did. Strzok and Page clearly conspired together. Strzok and Mueller did for awhile, until Mueller fired him. Comey and Rosenstein did at least momentarily and in requesting the FISA warrants.
Readers should recall these people referring to their desire for an “insurance policy” … how to get rid of Trump any way they can.
 
Here is an updated version of what people swear to… taking God and the Bible out of it in modern court rooms.

You do affirm that all the testimony you are about to give in the case now before the court will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; this you do affirm under the pains and penalties of perjury?

truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth–and if you tell an untruth or lie in common language = they’ve got you!

You seem to be quibbling over words… what am I saying that is wrong? You can lie to the FBI and nothing happens? Is this NEW procedure?
 
You seem to be quibbling over words… what am I saying that is wrong? You can lie to the FBI and nothing happens? Is this NEW procedure?
I am sorry that you would make that accusation against me.
It is interesting that most of the discussion in this forum has been about "perjury traps and the like that presuppose that these laws have no element of scienter or mens rea - that they are more like being charges for giving a wrong answer on an exam. I don’t think that that idea, or its polar opposite - that it is no longer a crime to lying to the FBI - properly characterize out legal system.

And I still don’t see anything about Comey indicated that HRC lied to FBI.
 
How do you explain this to children and simple thinking adults???
If you forget or make a mistake that is one thing, but if you speak falsely with the deliberate intent to deceive, that is a lie.

Let me ask you this: there are many times here that posters get there facts twisted or remember incorrectly and wind up posting something that is just untrue. I think that it is important to correct the record, lest others make the same mistake: but would you call the offending posters liars?

I wouldn’t. I think it is possible to speak and good faith, but wrongly. I think most everyone has done it. But, that is not lying.
 
Last edited:
40.png
petra22:
You seem to be quibbling over words… what am I saying that is wrong? You can lie to the FBI and nothing happens? Is this NEW procedure?
I am sorry that you would make that accusation against me.
It is interesting that most of the discussion in this forum has been about "perjury traps and the like that presuppose that these laws have no element of scienter or mens rea - that they are more like being charges for giving a wrong answer on an exam. I don’t think that that idea, or its polar opposite - that it is no longer a crime to lying to the FBI - properly characterize out legal system.

And I still don’t see anything about Comey indicated that HRC lied to FBI.
and you will never see anything about Comey indicated that HRC lied to FBI because you don’t want to see anything.
 
Last edited:
you will never see anything about Comey indicated that HRC lied to FB
What is strange is that all the people who seem to think that this is obvious never come up with the goods. Do you evidence of Comey saying such a thing: lying to the FBI?
 
Last edited:
I have to tell you–you’ve given me something to think about…not especially about Hilary or Comey, just about truth…and lies.
 
Last edited:
What is strange is that all the people who seem to think that this is obvious never come up with the goods. Do you evidence of Comey saying such a thing: lying to the FBI?
[crickets]
 
From what I have heard that is exactly how the FBI works. You make a statement and it turns out to be incorrect… Lying to the FBI==Bingo you go to jail.
Not always. Sometimes, as in Scooter Libby’s case, you make a statement, they pressure somebody else to say it was incorrect, you go to jail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top