Yes, that is the privelege, yet be humble in that role, for even a mule was a prophet for God who spoke, or the rocks would give Him glory otherwise (as does all creation).The bible is meaningless outside the context of The Church
And how do you know the church is correct?Nope. The Church does.
He’s going to say it’s because of Matthew 16:18 Jesus said And I tell you, you are Peter and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.And how do you know the church is correct?
Both have importance. Your mistake is that you toss out the second statement and focus only on the first.Without the first you never get the second
Only the Church gets to say what’s minor and what’s not.The double predestination and eternal security are somewhat minor issues
No, that is not what I do.Both have importance. Your mistake is that you toss out the second statement and focus only on the first.
Your comments indicate otherwise.No, that is not what I do.
How do you know?It’s also possible to be consistently right.
The Church is the latter.
“Those knowledgeable of the Lord’s precepts, keep them, as many as are written.” Barnabus ( and they all had been written by his penning here).And that faithfulness to teaching is determined by…
ORAR…once right always right…eternal security for the Church but not its members?It’s also possible to be consistently right.
The Church is the latter.
And relative to my post, what does the Church say, the Catholic Church, the Roman Catholic Church, say about being born again to see and believe, or is it see and believe to be born again?Only the Church gets to say what’s minor and what’s not.
What does that have to do with anything??How do you know the sky is blue?