S
SDA2RC
Guest
Millard,My point is simple: most Christians don’t recognize the Saturday Sabbath, though we do recognize the observance of the Sabbath. The insistence of the SDA that it should be Saturday, period, is evidently flawed by their own admission that they are not sure what exactly the day God began and ended creation; that in itself already destroys any notion that God prescribed a specific day for the Sabbath. Exodus also never prescribed any day for it. We are left only data from Luke and Acts that makes inference when the Sabbath is observed–but that’s a long way from Exodus, and by then it was an established tradition. So the SDA is left with much explaining where they got the notion that Saturday was the God-given day prescribed for its observance. As well, no SDA can say why they observe the Saturday Sabbath but do not even observe all of the Mosaic Law. If the SDA is true to itself, then it should also uphold the Levitical priesthood and the vestments used, the blood offerings and animal sacrifices for the atonement of sins, the celebration of the Jewish feasts and the exact way Jesus celebrated them, the penalties prescribed by the Mosaic Law for sins done, etc. If they do not observe these, then I have to ask it again: what right does the SDA have in demanding other Christians to observe the Saturday Sabbath when they themselves do not even observe the whole of the Mosaic Law, as they themselves are fond of saying?
No, my point is not about the Jews: follow again my line of reasoning to see what I am driving at–my point is that there is no mention of what day the Lord made His rest, nor any mention of what day Exodus prescribed the Sabbath should be observed. In short, we see a progression of Jewish tradition here, which fixed the day to a Saturday, but was not a God-given initiative. By the time of Luke and Acts, we already see a tradition established. I am interested to know how the SDA sees this progression of tradition for a Saturday Sabbath, and as well show that this tradition, from a Catholic perspective, can be changed without fully abrogating the Law. In other words, if it can be demonstrated that this the Saturday Sabbath is a Jewish tradition (again, as opposed to God merely asking to observe the Sabbath), then there is much argument on the side of historic Christianity to actually move this observance from Saturday to Sunday without violating the Law, and thus dent the SDA charge that early Christianity violated it. As we see, the SDA cannot even defend this point, nor say why they follow the Saturday Sabbath in the first place but ignore much of the Mosaic Law themselves.
I follow you up to the Manna in the desert, but after that, it has been fairly well established that Saturday is the Sabbath the Jews observed, which is the same day that God caused the Manna not to fall. While it is not called Saturday in scripture, to my knowledge there is not a single shred of evidence that the Seventh-Day that Jesus Rested on, and that the Jews rested on, is not the same day that we call Saturday.
On the other hand, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that supports the fact that Saturday is the Biblical 7th day of the week from at least Exodus forward. Since there was no Sabbath prior to Exodus, the modern correlation of the days of the week to the days of creation seems pointless.