The Catholic Church has always condemned any form of abuse.
In UK, there is zero tolerance of abuse. That is largely the response of the directions of John Paul 2, The appointments of Archbishops has been linked to their zero tolerance of child abuse.
There has also been various con-artists trying to ‘jump on the bandwagen’ by making false alegations in the hopes of getting compensation. There was the classic case published in a national newspaper over several weeks, making front page news.
It was alleged to have taken place at a school that no longer existed.
The records were thought no longer to exist either. WRONG! The local education authority kept them in their archives and when they were inspected to determine when the alleged ‘victims’ attended the school, it transpired that not one had ever registed at the school, much less attended. I do not recall reading of any retractions in the press.
Interestingly when this was put to the claimants, instead of challenging it, they all decided to withdraw their claims!! This sort of thing does not get published.
It is a fact that there is only a very small percentage of priests involved. About the same percentage of any denomination. Also, abuse in non-catholic churches, are often reported in the press as ‘catholic’ and ‘catholic priest implicated’! So the Church gets the blame even when the offenders are non-Catholic clergy,. That is because ‘catholic’ and ‘abuse’ sells. No one is interested in reading about 'pastor of the church of the Dutchelmsdisease. Catholic sells better.
Also not taken into account is that a lot of victims of child abuse internalise the abuse as a way of dealing with it, to prevent madness. Problem is once internalised, it remains there that ‘abuse is normal’. Victims then often go on to become abusers. That is a fact. I have seen records of both abusers and victims. They are often carbon copies of the other.
There has also been cases of non-catholics fraudulently conning their ways into seminaries [most get caught] in order to be in a postion of trust with children in order to abuse.
So, there are all sorts of explanations, that does not excuse a single act of victimizing behaviour and I am not trying to minimalize or trivialise the facts. It is just that the facts need a little clarification. Things are rarely as simple as they first appear.
The incidences are actually much fewer than is popularly imagined. Research showes ‘as per occupation’, Catholic Priests are still among the lowests incidences of risk to children, which is at variance with what the media would have you believe.