F
fpt
Guest
Each catholic has the moral obligation to fight the official heresies and ideologies that were and denounced and banned by the Teaching of Catholic Roman Church: all the doctrines and all the practices.
For example: The Encratism of the marital act; The Manicheism of the marital act; The Catharism of the marital act; The Jansenism of the marital act; The Fideism of the marital act; The Quietism of the marital act; The english Puritanism of the marital act; The american Puritanism of the marital act; The Pharisianism of the marital act; The Fideism of the marital act and of the Quietism of the marital act; the doctrinal refusal of the existence of right to the body, of right on the body and of the right of the body for each member of the couple, the doctrinal refusal of the existence of four ends of the marital act;
Each catholic has the moral obligation to avoid and to denounce some doctrines and practices that are not heresies or ideologies officially banned, per se, but that are very near, via the catholic true logic. In reality, they are unofficially banned, but they are morally wrong.
For instance:
1.The Externalism of the marital act, the Judgmentalism of the marital act, the Presumptionism of the near occasion of sin and the Pessimism of the marital act are linked to the Pharisianism of the marital act, to Jansenism of the marital act, to American Puritanism of the marital act and to the English Puritanism of the marital act;
2.The Prudism of the marital act are linked to American Puritanism of the marital act and to the english Puritanism of the marital act;
3.**The Quiverfullism of the marital act the absolute procreationism of the marital act are cousins of the Fideism of the marital act and of the Quietism of the marital act;
4.The primary anti-temporalism of the marital act, the primary anti-personalism of the marital act, the primary anti-phenomenologism of the marital act, the primary anti-sexologism of the marital act, the primary sexual anti-alteritism of conjugal act, the primary sexual anti-complementarism of the conjugal act and the Reductionism of the marital act to a simple coitus are linked to the refusal of the objective realistic personalist and phenomenological philosophy (metaphysics, teleology, phenomenology, personalism, natural sciences, the realism, the good rationalism, the catholic sexology, the moderation, the rules of Reason, the good sense).
5. The doctrinal refusal of the existence of rights to some foreplay to give and to receive, in the context of the marital act and the doctrinal refusal of the existence of rights to some sexual foreplay to give and to receive, in the context of the marital act does not respect the Canon Law and thus the existence of right to the body, of right on the body and of the right of the body for each member of the couple.
6. The Ronald L. Contism Jr of the acception of the definition of the sexual sin of masturbation by hands, by fingers, by tongue and by mouth, in the context of the marital act is a wrong reading of the catholic definition of the sin of masturbation and the negation of temporality, of the phenomenality, of carnality… of the marital act: a disease of the intelligence.
Saint John Paul II has to be read with all the global logic of the Catholic teaching, in the details with all the subleties (materiality and immateriality). Of course, I am not against this Pope, but the immaterial acpect of this topic has to be completed by the material aspect. This Pope talks about natural virtues and supranatural virtues, the immaterial aspect that is very essential and important. As catholic, the material aspect has to be respected.