I second those sentiments. Although I believe that there are many decent Muslims out there, there are many who believe that all infidels should be subjected to dhimmitude or death.
You should all try to find the book Why I Left Jihad by Walid Shoebat. The guy was born in the so-called ‘Palestinean Territories’ and raised to hate Christians and Jews. He eventually became a terrorist and attempted to actually bomb an Israeli bank, although it failed. Later, he would come to faith in Christ and is now a strong supporter of Israel. Anyway, his book details what he saw within Islam and looks at passages in the Quran that our media loves to ignore. It is a very interesting and well-written book that I think is worth reading.
A lot of people just don’t realize that Muslims believe that the only religion that Allah accepts is Islam and that all non-Muslim countries really belong to them, that’s why they don’t integrate and want separate laws for themselves while actively working to undermine the laws of the host country in order to bring it under the heel of Islam. They’re using our misguided multiculturalism to achieve their aims and then set up their form of multiculturalism which is nothing like ours.
Check out this interview with ex-Muslim Abul Kasem at FrontPage Magazine. It gives a very clear and scary idea about the goals of Islam.
islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/Islamic-Multiculturalism-interview.htm
**FP: **Ok, so what exactly does Islamic Multiculturalism entail?
Kasem: As I have noted, Islamists simply love the western concept of multiculturalism. It suits them perfectly to press on with their agenda of Islamization of western societies, by using the concepts of western democracy, freedom of expression, secularism, and respect for diverse culture, religion, language, and tradition. The Islamists cleverly use these noble ideals and good intentions to defeat the western policy makers in their own game.
We must comprehend that the Islamists have a totally different idea of multiculturalism. The foundation of Islamic Multiculturalism is solidly based on the supremacy of Islam, primacy of the Arabs, and the global Islamic Ummah. They find the western concept of multiculturalism too easy to use to their advantage.
For example, when Australia organizes ‘interfaith dialogue,’ the Islamists find in it an unparallel opportunity to espouse the ‘beauty’ of Islam. Mainly funded by the infidel tax payers, the ‘interfaith dialogue’ has become the best platform to advance Islam in the west. Thanks to those Westerners who are ignorant about Islam and are gullible useful idiots, the Islamists are laughing all the way to the mosques, knowing full well that Islam is totally safe in the hands of western politicians. The Islamists have nothing to worry about in terms of their agenda to eventually impose Islam on the infidel lands. The politicians of the infidel territories are doing the job for them (i.e., promoting Islam). These politicians even appoint the Islamists as advisors or consultative group in tackling Islamic terrorism. What could be more ironic than this?
jmcrae, is it just me or is there something that doesnt add up with your calculations?
