J
JRKH
Guest
Trying to apply this term to non-catholic Christians today is stretching the credibility fo the term The Church recognizes this and addresses it in the Catechism under “Wounds to Unity” and “Towards Unity” which are both contained under “The Church is One”I don’t think this is true, gcnuss. The original use of the term “protestare” in the Latin meant to stand up for what one believed, over and against the Catholic Church. When a person “disagrees” with Catholic doctrine they are standing up for what they believe over and against the Catholic view (protesting). They may not think about it that way - in fact, I think most of them dont’, but that does not change the facts.
Para 818 is particularly pointed in saying:
“However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities… [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers . . . . All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church.”
So - while the term Protestant is used as designation of the origin of the groups, those currently in those groups are probably NOT protesting the Catholic Church in any way resembling those in the 16th century.
ONe MIGHT properly call “protestant” those Catholics who abandon the faith for another faith community, but certainly not those who are either a) born and raised in a gvien community, or b) initially unchurched and brought to Christ and baptism through one of these communities.
Peace
James
