L
Lea101
Guest
We gave you more than three examples in this whole conversation. Which you ignored and gave non answers I response. Scroll upAnd what were those advances? Three examples if you don’t mind.
Last edited:
We gave you more than three examples in this whole conversation. Which you ignored and gave non answers I response. Scroll upAnd what were those advances? Three examples if you don’t mind.
Not seeing what? This is indeed a detailed conversation.Not seeing it. Seems like it is has been a pretty detailed conversation.
? Whatever God calls them to. Forcing women to have kids, or stripping away their freedom to choose if they want to work is barbaric. All we can do is make it easier for working women to be able to have kids, and promote motherhood/fatherhood. A focus on mental health is also necessary (Japan especially).Not if women do it en masse . Check out what happening in Japan - it’s heading for extinction - fast. Women there simply aren’t having enough babies.
Hmmm, let me think … what’s more important - women having careers or women having babies?
You would be very silly to think it’s plain old feminism and not other factors that led her to have such an unfortunate breakdown. Many of my teachers, doctors, nurses etc have kids and are doing fine mentally, because they don’t neglect health.But after ten years of “having it all” - two children and a career (teacher) - she suffered a complete physical and mental breakdown. She was reduced to skin’n’bone and her hair was falling out - took her two years of rest to recover.
This isn’t the typical arrangement of a dual income household. Why didn’t he move in with her? We can flip it around and make him look like the selfish one as well.My cousin married a career woman (psychologist). He now lives and works in one town and his wife lives and works in another town, a hundred miles away. He sees his wife and two kids only on weekends - the rest of the time he lives alone. His wife refuses to give up her job, which is why she lives in a different town. They’re married, but only part-time. If their “marriage” ends in divorce, no one should be surprised.
Same with this. We can always flip it and blame the man. What were those arguments? Why was she so unhappy with him leading? Did she feel like she wasn’t respected? And so on.My best friend was happily married until his wife (urged on by her rabid-feminist mother) took a course in “women’s assertiveness”, after which all the arguments started about his place as the head of the family. They eventually divorced.
It’s creepy … a one-sided talk-fest for the worse secularism and the Loony Left have offer. In other words, typical ABC poison (and a shameful waste of taxpayers’ money).There’s an Aussie programme called Q and A
I think that treating women as second class citizens is a great way to start. One could suggest, for example, that a university education is a bad thing.How to create millions of enemies for the Catholic Church:
Women still experience a lot of discrimination in Japan so it’s not like most of them are busy climbing the career ladder. So I don’t think the career aspirations of women are to blame.Hmmm, let me think … what’s more important - women having careers or women having babies?
When people criticize people who are “child-free” for being selfish are they suggesting that selfish people make good parents?
If we all waited until we were selfless people or were saints no one would be able to become a parent.They probably think that parenthood can cure selfishness automatically.
People who are selfish and have no intentions of changing will not become selfless once they become parents.
It can. But it’s not a certainty. And some people are self aware enough to not have children. Too many children have suffered due to a selfish parent and it gets perpetuated when adults thoughtlessly have children.While parenting won’t necessarily make any one a saint, it is one thing that can draw you very close to God and change your perspective on life rather quickly at times.
So, I am not sure how that would work out as a Catholic marrying in the Catholic church and are required to be open to life. I realize that there are many Catholics who choose not to have children but that is going against the Church.And some people are self aware enough to not have children. Too many children have suffered due to a selfish parent and it gets perpetuated when adults thoughtlessly have children.
I guess I would say there is a difference in using NFP for heath problems versus using it because a person feels they are a selfish person and so shouldn’t have children. As people mature and grow in their relationship with Christ hopefully a lot of selfishness is lost.Even those Catholics who choose not to have children because of health problems and practice NFP?