A
angel12
Guest
According to doctors treating some of these patients in Boston, the medical deferrals do not provide a pathway to citizenship. Pretty good reason.
- Status
Indeed. That’s a fact that always matters when talking about things like “single payer healthcare”, etc. Freedom depends upon minimal dependence on government.Unfortunately, what the Government gives it can also take away. It’s a Machine
As for the woman, recognizing that we can’t care for all of the sick in the world, we can help a few. As I said, she came here the right way.
Last edited:
A
angel12
Guest
Well, they’re the ones who decided to suddenly eliminate the program.
R
Rockoh22
Guest
So this was never an issue before. They actually had path to citizenship with this situations? When was it removed?
C
Cruciferi
Guest
Who knows. Sounds like the entire arrangement was fragile by its very nature. I guess it’s a chance people take.
D
dvdjs
Guest
The people executing it. This is not a chance event. People have to act. And those who could intervene have to acquiesce.
C
Cruciferi
Guest
And barring some high level intervention she’ll have to leave regardless. Like I said, Canada is a possibility until she can reapply for entry. Hopefully her legal team has some strategy.
A
angel12
Guest
Who said there was one? Maybe you should go back and read the articles. You seem to be confusing separate issues.
Last edited:
P
pnewton
Guest
I think this just happened.
There is a misunderstanding that somehow any stupid thing a law enforcement person does is the fault of legislators, as they write the law. Yet laws are written with the understanding that the enforcement would be done by someone who is capable of judgement. Yes, sometimes laws have to be re-written to stop enforcement that is cruel and inhuman, or that is an egregious exercise of power. That takes time though, and often it is this type of judgement that highlights deficiencies in the law.
We have seen examples of this for the last three years, but with a Republican Senate no change in law will occur anytime soon. It is far easier to change out the executive for one who stops blaming Congress for his decisions and understands that leadership means taking responsibility for one’s own actions, at the very least, especially if he thinks he knows the best laws, and is the smart at legal things.
F
F_Marturana
Guest
You need a green card to apply for citizenship. Qualifying for a visa doesn’t automatically mean you qualify for a green card.
Maybe part of the blame sits with those who have worked hard to undermine our sovereignty. Open borders are expensive. It takes money to care for the children who break our immigration laws, money that could have been spent on this program.Rockoh22:
Well, they’re the ones who decided to suddenly eliminate the program.
F
F_Marturana
Guest
She’s insured privately.
R
Rockoh22
Guest
You blame the administration. That means that this never happened before. Why are you blaming the administration? Was Trump the one who decided to kicked this people out and remove protections that existed already?
C
Cruciferi
Guest
But we don’t know if these folks were denied.
A
angel12
Guest
- Who should be blamed for the elimination of a program, if not the people who eliminated it?
- You’re the one bringing Trump personally into this, not me.
Even more reason to allow her to stay.
R
Rockoh22
Guest
I did not, the article did, and you blamed the “pro-life” administration. To which I was open ears, until you left me hanging. Now I am not so sure what you mean at all.
V
Victoria33
Guest
They need to fix this but I see no evidence that the government understands or even knew of her special condition. Her lawyer has sent a letter to authority trying to change this.
www.mercurynews.com
So, it’s rather wrong to blame the “administration” as some seemed to do in this thread without evidence to back it up.
This is probably why these letters are sent out. So, any matters can be ironed out.
If the government reverses their action on this, we really need to remember those who so rashly placed blame on others and really said some very bad things as if this was a done deal. Talk about sinful.
‘This is a shock,’ says Bay Area woman who faces deportation, loss of life-saving treatment
Because the treatment Maria Isabel Bueso has been receiving in the Bay Area isn’t available in Guatemala, deportation would be tantamount to a death sentence.
www.mercurynews.com
So, it’s rather wrong to blame the “administration” as some seemed to do in this thread without evidence to back it up.
This is probably why these letters are sent out. So, any matters can be ironed out.
If the government reverses their action on this, we really need to remember those who so rashly placed blame on others and really said some very bad things as if this was a done deal. Talk about sinful.
Last edited:
A
angel12
Guest
It’s very simple, not complex at all. I have no idea why you’re having trouble understanding. Maybe someone else can help you out
T
Theo520
Guest
I support immediate life saving care, but I don’t support providing perpetual care for everyone who shows up illegally.
Our responsibility would be to provide his/her care givers back home with the knowledge to continue perpetual care.
- Status