I don’t have good eyes but I can tell you that my own signatures have “significant differences” from one day to the next (let alone the gap of a number of years in the Biden signatures) and I don’t do crack or meth to mess with my fine motor coordination. Mostly, I chalk up the daily “significant differences” in my signatures to old age.HarryStotle:
Anybody with good eyes can tell there are significant differences.
That would be expected, though. I am certain Hunter would have been more careful with legal documents and contracts with foreign government ministries and such. A computer repair shop, not so much. That adds to the argument that the signature is authentic, it doesn’t detract from it.HarryStotle:
The work order doesn’t seem the same as any of the exemplars, but, frankly, that’s not really a “good” signature.
I don’t know, Mine is pretty standard all the time. And, you can actually read my name.
A significant difference between yours and the examples we have of Hunter Biden.
I thought the same thing.
And then, of course, there was this, in JOE BIDEN’s OWN WORDS:
Given that it has passed hands a few times, what would physical access to the laptops provide that a backup of the data would not? Though there are now potentially questions of the integrity of the data if there’s not an established chain of custody.
And they accuse Trump of using foul language. :crazy_face:Ridgerunner:
And then, of course, there was this, in JOE BIDEN’s OWN WORDS:
Watch Biden Brag About Bribing Ukraine To Fire Investigator Of Son's Biz
Joe Biden was so proud of his role in the prosecutor’s removal from investigating the company paying his son $50,000 per month merely to serve on its board that he actually bragged about it in a 2018 speech at an event for the publication Foreign Affairs. In this speech, Biden boasts his threat to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loans from Ukraine if they did not agree to fire the prosecutor who happened to be investigating the company giving his son a cushy sinecure.
The prosecutor was fired, and the investigation was dropped six months later.
This video has been out for 2 years? No indictment yet. Nothing Burger.Son of a gun…JB n this video
Just to calibrate your standards regarding justice. If everything on the laptop is proved to be true, should Biden still be elected to lead the country as president?1cthlctrth:
This video has been out for 2 years? No indictment yet. Nothing Burger.Son of a gun…JB n this video
Better hurry, if Biden wins, he can’t be touched for 4 years.
Not really.
touch -d 20190520 someFile.txtThe complexity of the file system also means there are ways to trace when and where aberrations in filing have occurred. There are logs and such that would all have to be adjusted. To construct an entire laptop of files in such a way as to make every file consistent and appear authentic would not be so easy. We are talking email and messaging programs, image files with their metadata and a host of system files and logs that would all have to be consistent. Discrepancies would show up somewhere. That is to say nothing of checking the external sources and servers that would have to match.Ridgerunner:
Not really.
A “Computer person” can check the file attributes to see what date is reported within them. A “Computer person” can also edit those attributes. The low-tech way of placing a file on a computer with a specific date stamp is to simply change the computer’s clock and copy a file to it. The computers are reported to be Macs, which is a Unix based operating systems. On *nix operating systems (Unix and Linux) someone can use the “touch” command to set the file date attributes on a file.
The following would set the date of a file to May 20, 2019
There’s more to be said about creating a specific digital trail. A high amount of skill is not demanded to do this.Code:touch -d 20190520 someFile.txt
I took into consideration of that. But to speak specifically on it, I would need to know what e-mail client was being used. For example, if the client “Outlook” from Office 365 was used, the e-mails are stored in a single PST file. The date of the PST file will be from the last time that an e-mail was downloaded, or an appointment was added, or some other change. Information on the individual e-mails is then not exposed through the file system attributes; one only has the date that the PST was created and the last time that it was accessed.
The Mueller “investigation” took longer.