P
ProVobis
Guest
Or each district in the case of Maine and Nebraska. But there is no national popular vote, though pollsters generally don’t see it that way.there is a popular vote in each state
Last edited:
Or each district in the case of Maine and Nebraska. But there is no national popular vote, though pollsters generally don’t see it that way.there is a popular vote in each state
The assertion isn’t fair.Yes, but everyone doesn’t have the financial means to fight back. Trump seems to have the financial and legal means to do the shafting. Is this fair?
I have never heard what happens to preferred stockholders in Chapter 11. But I don’t know that there were any in the Trump company cases. I assume they would be subject to the “Absolute Priority Rule” too, since they’re not actually “creditors” but a classification of equity owners.Creditors are not always equal in bk cases. I know all about it being a preferred stockholder in the Conseco bk of 2002.
Do they get paid the full amount, or pennies on the dollar?But did they? In Chapter 11 everybody gets paid unless the judge decides they didn’t earn it.
That’s why owners and common shareholders try to find buyers for the company while in bk Court. They can personally gain while the creditors and contractors lose. (If there is no ownership, creditors are at risk of losing everything.)They get the full amount if the owner is allowed to keep any equity in the company.
Whether or not it is equivalent is irrelevant. For the election of a president, each state holds a popular electionAnd you are making a false equivalence, as if the popular vote for Electors is equivalent to a popular vote for a President. Are you ever going to address the question I keep asking you about why dictionary.com is wrong? (Last chance now…)
Precisely…JonNC:![]()
Or each district in the case of Maine and Nebraska. But there is no national popular vote, though pollsters generally don’t see it that way.there is a popular vote in each state
Not all shafting is resolved by Chap 11. If someone owes a few thousand dollars for work performed and refuses to pay, he might not be taken to court because of prohibitive legal costs to the other person but that doesn’t mean he won’t accumulate enemies and a less-than-good reputation.Both things can’t happen in Ch 11.
This was the new wall built under Trump? Or the outdated wall that needs replacing?except for that part about the portion of the wall already existing being useless by a few guys with shovels…LOL
This is not Trump’s wall. Exactly why we need an updated wall.The migrants were taken into custody about 10 miles east of the San Luis Port of Entry, along a stretch of the US-Mexico border lined with older fencing – steel panels welded onto posts that previously served as vehicle barriers, with little foundation to speak of.
So is the money to repair the existing wall or build new sections without repairing what is broken? If both, how much for each?This is not Trump’s wall. Exactly why we need an updated wall.
build new sections without repairing what is broken?
he would be satisfied with funding to renovate existing barrier — not just add barrier to parts of the border that aren’t already fenced.
And he set a goal of 500 to 550 miles of barrier — new or replacement — in place by the 2020 election, 22 months away.