So Much For Trump's Latest Proposal

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChuckB
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
there is a popular vote in each state
Or each district in the case of Maine and Nebraska. But there is no national popular vote, though pollsters generally don’t see it that way.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but everyone doesn’t have the financial means to fight back. Trump seems to have the financial and legal means to do the shafting. Is this fair?
The assertion isn’t fair.

In Chapter 11, there is an “unsecured creditors’ committee” that has a lot of power. Its purposes is to enforce the claims of the unsecured creditors. There is also a rule called the “Absolute Priority Rule” that says the company has to pay all creditors in full if its owners can keep anything.

Some creditors don’t keep good records. Some make outrageous claims. The judge rules on their reliability, in whole or in part. If the judge says the claim is legitimate, it has to be paid or the owners lose all equity in the company. The judge has the power to reduce claims to their real value.

That’s not to say all of the creditors are happy. Undoubtedly, some are not.
 
Creditors are not always equal in bk cases. I know all about it being a preferred stockholder in the Conseco bk of 2002. Banks and bonders were made whole, preferreds got little, and the owners got dissolved.
 
Last edited:
Creditors are not always equal in bk cases. I know all about it being a preferred stockholder in the Conseco bk of 2002.
I have never heard what happens to preferred stockholders in Chapter 11. But I don’t know that there were any in the Trump company cases. I assume they would be subject to the “Absolute Priority Rule” too, since they’re not actually “creditors” but a classification of equity owners.
 
I just read your addition, and am not surprised that was the result.

Generally speaking, secured creditors come out the best, if they can keep secured and not subjected to a “cram down” where their interest in the security is diminished. Unsecureds come out second best unless the creditors’ committee can undo some secured creditor’s position. Preferreds next, and ordinary stockholders dead last.
 
They get the full amount if the owner is allowed to keep any equity in the company. If they don’t, then the owner is divested of his interest in the company and it’s sold to someone else with the proceeds paid to the unsecured creditors.

It’s my understanding (could be wrong, but nobody has said otherwise) that Trump was able to keep his interest and later sold it. If so, the “Absolute priority Rule” would require that all unsecured creditors be paid in full. That doesn’t mean every claimed amount is paid just because it’s claimed. Judges rule on whether the claim is legitimate or not.
 
They get the full amount if the owner is allowed to keep any equity in the company.
That’s why owners and common shareholders try to find buyers for the company while in bk Court. They can personally gain while the creditors and contractors lose. (If there is no ownership, creditors are at risk of losing everything.)
 
Last edited:
Both things can’t happen in Ch 11. I think you’re thinking about something else.
 
Look at Sears. A new owner just got financing to resume operations in many malls. The financing wouldn’t have been possible had the company still been in debt.
 
I’m not familiar with what happened with Sears. But it sounds like a “white knight” stepped in. Sometimes when that happens, the old stockholders and officers get the boot and the judge reorganizes the obligations. It doesn’t mean they all go away, necessarily. And sometimes, creditors are given equity positions if there’s not enough money in a liquidation to pay them.
 
And you are making a false equivalence, as if the popular vote for Electors is equivalent to a popular vote for a President. Are you ever going to address the question I keep asking you about why dictionary.com is wrong? (Last chance now…)
Whether or not it is equivalent is irrelevant. For the election of a president, each state holds a popular election
I provided a link that confirms a popular election in each state.
 
40.png
JonNC:
there is a popular vote in each state
Or each district in the case of Maine and Nebraska. But there is no national popular vote, though pollsters generally don’t see it that way.
Precisely…
 
Maybe you should learn about how our elections are conducted - the electoral vote is the decider!
 
Both things can’t happen in Ch 11.
Not all shafting is resolved by Chap 11. If someone owes a few thousand dollars for work performed and refuses to pay, he might not be taken to court because of prohibitive legal costs to the other person but that doesn’t mean he won’t accumulate enemies and a less-than-good reputation.
 
Last edited:
I know how the electoral college works. Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million. He was not “chosen by the people.” The majority did not vote for him. Maybe you should learn some math.
 
Last edited:
except for that part about the portion of the wall already existing being useless by a few guys with shovels…LOL
This was the new wall built under Trump? Or the outdated wall that needs replacing?

Edit: It was the older wall…

The migrants were taken into custody about 10 miles east of the San Luis Port of Entry, along a stretch of the US-Mexico border lined with older fencing – steel panels welded onto posts that previously served as vehicle barriers, with little foundation to speak of.
This is not Trump’s wall. Exactly why we need an updated wall.
 
Last edited:
build new sections without repairing what is broken?
he would be satisfied with funding to renovate existing barrier — not just add barrier to parts of the border that aren’t already fenced.

And he set a goal of 500 to 550 miles of barrier — new or replacement — in place by the 2020 election, 22 months away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top