Someone can lose their salvation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guanophore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet Scripture says:Rom 3:29-30 "Or is God {the God} of Jews only? Is He not {the God} of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.There’s no “initial” justification stated here, or anywhere in Scripture. Just the divinely revealed fact of it. Nor baptism, but faith alone.Rom 4:4-5 "Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,"Not his baptism, but “his faith.” Always, faith alone.The word “initially” was not used.Your “if” condition, by default, cancels out the false notion of your “once saved” condition. In Catholicism one is not “saved” UNTIL he satisfies the probationary “if” condition demanded by it. Leaving Catholics clueless as to their salvation status and bound to a system of sacramentalism, rather than a “walk by faith” in what God accomplished, once for all, in the sacrificial work of His incarnate Son on the cross.There you go, that’s better: “will be saved.” In other words, salvation by works alone.Rendering the substitutionary, sacrificial work of Jesus Christ totally insignificant in respect to salvation and the forgiveness of sins. But Scripture says…Col 2:13-14 "When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.

Acts 10:43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”

Acts 13:38 “Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you,”

Col 1:14 "…in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins."You present a blatant contradiction of terms. If it’s a “reward” it’s not 'freely given. A “reward” is recompense, a payment due for services rendered; a wage. Scripture, on the other hand, presents eternal life as a “gift,” not a reward:Rom 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.And a surety, a present possession of every true believer:John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

1 John 5:11-13 "And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life. These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life."Here’s the Biblical basis for the true Christian faith and divine justification:Rom 4:4-5 "Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,Nope, nothing “initial” about this, pending works of righteousness. But instead Paul says:1 Cor 1:21 "For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not {come to} know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe."You see, from the time of Abraham, it’s been revealed that it’s one’s faith that God reckons to the believer as righteousness (justification, Gen. 15:6). That’s faith alone…“not as a result of works.” The object of salvation faith during this church age is the Person and sacrificial work of the incarnate Son. One is to believe the testimony of God concerning Him.
Well lets call a spade a spade shall we? The word alone is never used in conjunction with Faith accept in James 2 and it says the exact opposite of what you believe. It says “you see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone”. To believe in “faith alone” for justification is to ignore a whole lot of scripture.
 
Hi, moondweller,

Thank you for your thoughtful post.

A few items caught my eye.
Nor baptism, but faith alone.
Christ was quite clear about the need for Baptism to become a child of God. In his nocturnal teachings to Nicodemus as found in John 3:1-5

**Now there was a Pharisee named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews.
2
He came to Jesus at night and said to him, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God, for no one can do these signs that you are doing unless God is with him.”
3
Jesus answered and said to him, “Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can see the kingdom of God without being born from above.”
4
Nicodemus said to him, “How can a person once grown old be born again? Surely he cannot reenter his mother’s womb and be born again, can he?”
5
Jesus answered, "Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit. **

We see this essentially at the start of Christ’s Public Life. Then we see Christ concluding His Public Ministry in the last two verses of Matthew 28:

Then Jesus approached and said to them, "All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
19
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
20
teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age."


While faith is not specifically mentioned - it is certanly required if Nicodemous and every one else after him is to believe in Jesus Now this faith that most of us have has not yet measured up to the Mustard Seed standard given by Christ (Matt 17:20)…but most of us are still working on it.🙂

Notice. Christ does not present Baptism as an optional requirement, or some nice thought that believers may elect to choose. The way I read it - it is a requirement that must be followed if we claim to believe what Christ said.

There is another - and, at least for me - a more important issue that I am compelled to bring to your attention. Pitting the inspired words of St. Paul against the Word of God is the ultimate foolishness. St. Paul was finding every way that he could glorify God while he directed and corrected the young Catholic Church’s growth and development in the Spirit.

By example, there is nothing is this post that would convey to you that I thought the Sacrament of Penance and Holy Communion was very important, too! Yet, prior to this paragraph I had not metioned them. Adding them in, as I did, represents possibly a complete break in the logical sequencing of these paragraphs! :eek: Paul’s letter can not possibly contain every thing - that is why he went and spoke to many of the Churches - you can always say more verbally then you can write.😃 (And, how about that, we are into Oral Tradition! - could be another break in the paragraph!! 😃 ) OK, I’ll stop…😉

But, I think you get the idea - you can have everything in one sentence, or paragraph or letter - no one can possible write that way so someone in the 16th Century can try to turn one’s words around to fit a new gospel. 😦

Of course, you know what would be really convincing - if you were to find the Words of Christ, that told the Apostels that they just had to preach Faith. Faith was all that necessary. Baptism was as option as these works. Now, that would be something to see! But, if you were to ‘find’ them, they would truly be in ‘another gospel’.

Till then, if there is a conflict (and, in reality there isn’t) stick with the Words of Christ.

God bless
 
Hi, firstmode,

Thank you for your post. I read and re-read the material and found it quite interesting.🙂

Prior to reading this, I was not familiar with Arminius - only Calvin. Now, after having read these 5 positon statemes - and them alone - I am thinking that they sound like the Catholic teachings:

**(1) Though born a sinner, mankind is given a spark of divine grace that enables him to respond positively to God.

(2) God does not arbitrarily consign some people to eternal damnation; their willful rejection of God’s salvation makes them responsible.

(3) Christ died for every person, even though some refuse to accept the provision for their salvation

(4) No person is forced against his or her will to become a Christian.

(5) One’s salvation can be lost through willful disobedience. **

Now, how the Assemblies of God actually explains these items, and their other beliefs is not a question - just these 5 as writen and presented.

Here is question to the list, have I missed something here? Are these actually teachings of the CC? :confused:

Thanks for your help.

God bless
I cannot find anything here that departs from the Apostolic Teaching preserved in the Catholic Church.
 
Hi, Guanophore,

While just a little short of a “Imprimatur”…😃 I feel really relieved I did not miss something.
I cannot find anything here that departs from the Apostolic Teaching preserved in the Catholic Church.
Now, I guess that the Assemblies of God have been seen as causing another major break with world-wide Protestantism. But, these 5 items certainly sound good to me. I am curious when the group is going to address the Real Presence? 🙂

Seriously, I am just so surprised as this pronouncement from the 'home / corporate office of th AOG - maybe we should ask the Holy Spirit for a special inervention to get these guys in the Barque of Peter.

Again, that you for reviewing that material.

Best wishes and God bless
 
paul c:
Man was initially justified by Faith through the sacrament of Baptism, which cleanses us of our sin and puts us in the state of Grace. If we die in this state, we will be saved.
Yes, this is what you believe. But the Scriptures state nothing about “initial” justification or “initial” salvation. Only the FACT of justification and salvation, and that by/through faith alone, and states nothing about baptism being the cause. It’s those who have believed and are saved/justified through faith in Christ alone, that are to be subsequently baptized.

Scripture teaches us that all who believe in the Person and work of Jesus Christ are “under grace” but says nothing about the believer being put in a “state of grace” which must be held on to by him till death, and on which his future salvation hinges. Your statement, “if we die in this state, we will be saved,” testifies to the fact that you believe you’re not saved now but in a probationary state (not a “state of grace”), and your future salvation is conditioned on your performance (works), rather than Christ’s historic, redemptive and reconciliatory work on the cross on your behalf. This does render the cross of Christ, in respect to your future salvation, insignificant. Your future salvation depends entirely on your performance now.
You quarrel with the word initially justified but as our breathren in the Assemblies of God note, there is ample scriptural support for justification to be lost through sin, which makes the word “initial” appropriate.
If justification can be lost through sin then God’s testimony concerning His Son as a final, propitiatory and redemptive sacrifice for sins, is a lie; and the cross, where He bore ALL our sins, once for all, is rendered insignificant.

But in Biblical Christianity, sin is not the defining issue - belief is (Acts 16:31). God dealt with our sins judicially, once for all, two thousand years ago. But such an event is rendered trivial to those who are still striving to enter through their works (see Jn. 10:9; 14:6).John 5:24 "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life."According to the Scriptures, those who believe do not come into judgment but they have passed out of death (future judgment is reserved only for the “dead” in Adam) into life (Christ’s resurrected life).
Now the great difficulty between us is that you think that man has no responsibility for his actions.
I think no such thing. What I do know, however, is that according to the Scriptures, a man’s salvation is not based on his actions (works), but that of the Theanthopic Man, the man Christ Jesus; His finished work on the cross on man’s behalf. In respect to salvation/justification, man’s responsibility is to believe the testimony of God concerning Christ and His work. It is God Himself who then saves and justifies through faith alone.
As for your continual statement that the Catholic sotierology renders the cross insignificant, you must admit that this is not true.
Go back and read my leading argument again and you must admit that I cannot retract my statement.
 
40.png
broski234:
Well lets call a spade a spade shall we? The word alone is never used in conjunction with Faith
But in conjunction with salvation and justification, faith is stated alone:Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith;"

Rom 3:22 “even {the} righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe;”

Rom 3:27-28 "Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law.

Rom 3:30 “…since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”

Rom 4:5 “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,”

Rom 4:13 “For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.”

Rom 4:16 "For this reason {it is} by faith, in order that {it may be} in accordance with grace,

Gal 3:2 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of law, or by hearing with faith?

Gal 3:6-7 "Even so Abraham believed God, and it (his faith) was reckoned to him as righteousness. Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.

Gal 3:9 "So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer.

Gal 3:23-24 “But before faith came, we were kept in custody under law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.”“By faith” is always stated alone. It is not in the least bit a stretch to conclude that according to the Scriptures salvation and justification are based on faith alone.
accept in James 2 and it says the exact opposite of what you believe. It says “you see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone”.
The context is demonstrating one’s faith through works. See Ja. 2:18. The difference between a mere “said” faith and a true faith. James must be understood in context.
To believe in “faith alone” for justification is to ignore a whole lot of scripture.
Actually, based on just what I’ve posted above (and those are just a few), it’s you who ignore a whole lot of Scripture.
 
40.png
tqualey:
Christ was quite clear about the need for Baptism to become a child of God. In his nocturnal teachings to Nicodemus as found in John 3:1-5
Baptism isn’t mentioned in those passages. The need was to be born again. Peter speaks of being “born again,” and not in reference to baptism either:1 Pet 1:3 "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope (how? through baptism? No) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to {obtain} an inheritance {which is} imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."Peter’s not speaking of a future salvation, but a future revealing.
Notice. Christ does not present Baptism as an optional requirement, or some nice thought that believers may elect to choose. The way I read it - it is a requirement that must be followed if we claim to believe what Christ said.
It’s not a requirement for salvation, but it’s the saved who are to be baptized. Those who believe are to be subsequently baptized. But it’s not the baptism through which God saves them, it’s their belief.
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
It’s those who have become “disciples” that are then baptized.

Interesting that Paul should make this statement about the Apostolic ministry Christ commissioned to him:1 Cor 1:17 "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void.Through the years the act of baptism has essentially replaced faith (e.g., infant baptism), and the cross of Jesus Christ, in much of Christendom, has been made void.
 
But in conjunction with salvation and justification, faith is stated alone:Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith;"

Rom 3:22 “even {the} righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe;”

Rom 3:27-28 "Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law.

Rom 3:30 “…since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”

Rom 4:5 “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,”

Rom 4:13 “For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.”

Rom 4:16 "For this reason {it is} by faith, in order that {it may be} in accordance with grace,

Gal 3:2 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of law, or by hearing with faith?

Gal 3:6-7 "Even so Abraham believed God, and it (his faith) was reckoned to him as righteousness. Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.

Gal 3:9 "So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer.

Gal 3:23-24 “But before faith came, we were kept in custody under law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.”“By faith” is always stated alone. It is not in the least bit a stretch to conclude that according to the Scriptures salvation and justification are based on faith alone.The context is demonstrating one’s faith through works. See Ja. 2:18. The difference between a mere “said” faith and a true faith. James must be understood in context.Actually, based on just what I’ve posted above (and those are just a few), it’s you who ignore a whole lot of Scripture.
I agree with those passages 100%. But nowhere does it say what you are trying to make it say. Yes faith is very important in the salvation process. Eph 2:10 says that God has prepared good works for us beforehand that we should walk in them, doesn’t it. So, it is God’s will that we do these good works that He has set aside for us, right? Well, what if we don’t do them? Are we still saved? The Bible says, “NO!” Matt 7:21, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of Heaven, but he who does the will of My Father Who is in Heaven.” So, we must do these good works to get into Heaven, right? But, we can only do them by the grace of God.

Look at Romans 2:6-7. It says quite clearly that God will render to every man according to his faith? NO! According to his works. And it says quite clearly that “those who by patience in well-doing [good works] seek for glory and honor and immortality, He will give ETERNAL LIFE.” Titus 3:5, I agree with 100%. Notice it’s talking about Baptism – the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit! Eph 2:9, I agree with 100%. But as I just pointed out, you have to keep reading through Eph 2:10. Rom 3:10, I agree with 100%. But, if you interpret it as absolutely no one being righteous, instead of taking into account the context of the Old Testament verse from which it is quoted (Psalms 14:1-4), then you will run into some difficulties with other parts of Scripture. For example, Luke 1:6 says that both of John the Baptist’s parents were “righteous before God.” How is that possible if absolutely no one is righteous? Plus, Romans 2:11 says that no one is seeking God. Aren’t you seeking God? I know I am? How does that fit into your interpretation of this verse?
 
I]By faith
" is always stated alone. It is not in the least bit a stretch to conclude that according to the Scriptures salvation and justification are based on faith alone.The context is demonstrating one’s faith through works. See Ja. 2:18. The difference between a mere “said” faith and a true faith. James must be understood in context.Actually, based on just what I’ve posted above (and those are just a few), it’s you who ignore a whole lot of Scripture.

Well, let me bring to your attention Galations 5:6. St. Paul says it is faith working through love that saves us. Now on to James. Where does the bible say that works automatically follow if one has a true and saving faith. Read James 2:26. Here St. Paul makes an analogy. If the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead. Did you catch that? Body=faith and spirit=works. If the body doesn’t have spirit, it’s still a body, its just dead. Likewise faith without works, is still faith, it’s just dead faith. So both are important in the salvation process, just as the Catholic Church teaches. Let me ask you this. Are you infallible? If your answer is “yes”, by what authority do you make this claim? If your answer is “no”, could it be possible that the Catholic Church may actually have it right on this particular doctrine?
 
Moondweller,
Why don’t you answer my points directly instead of pointing back to something that only vaguely applies

I said :
As for your continual statement that the Catholic sotierology renders the cross insignificant, you must admit that this is not true. Without Christ 's cross, we can not get the initial grace required for salvation nor would we have the sacrament of reconciliation to regain Grace after sin. Furthermore there would be no faith that are the basis of Good works, and we all agree that good works without the loving intent to do God’s will are meaningless. So Christ Cross is essential to salvation in the Catholic sotierology.
your response was:
Go back and read my leading argument again and you must admit that I cannot retract my statement
which I assumes means this:
Scripture teaches us that all who believe in the Person and work of Jesus Christ are “under grace” but says nothing about the believer being put in a “state of grace” which must be held on to by him till death, and on which his future salvation hinges. Your statement, “if we die in this state, we will be saved,” testifies to the fact that you believe you’re not saved now but in a probationary state (not a “state of grace”), and your future salvation is conditioned on your performance (works), rather than Christ’s historic, redemptive and reconciliatory work on the cross on your behalf. This does render the cross of Christ, in respect to your future salvation, insignificant. Your future salvation depends entirely on your performance now.
So yes, I believe that we can lose Grace and our salvation. That does not make the the Cross insignificant. The cross is very significant because without it you can not be saved.

What you want to say is that you believe the cross is the TOTALITY of salvation, never to be denied or influenced by anything else. We believe, instead, that it is the BASIS of salvation, without which no one can be saved but that man must be baptized, have faith and do God’s will to complete the act of salvation. But the cross is never INSIGNIFICANT to any Christian.
 
Well, let me bring to your attention Galations 5:6. St. Paul says it is faith working through love that saves us. Now on to James. Where does the bible say that works automatically follow if one has a true and saving faith. Read James 2:26. Here St. Paul makes an analogy. If the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead. Did you catch that? Body=faith and spirit=works. If the body doesn’t have spirit, it’s still a body, its just dead. Likewise faith without works, is still faith, it’s just dead faith. So both are important in the salvation process, just as the Catholic Church teaches. Let me ask you this. Are you infallible? If your answer is “yes”, by what authority do you make this claim? If your answer is “no”, could it be possible that the Catholic Church may actually have it right on this particular doctrine?
Do Catholics believe that works save them?
 
Baptism isn’t mentioned in those passages. The need was to be born again. Peter speaks of being “born again,” and not in reference to baptism either:1 Pet 1:3 "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope (how? through baptism? No) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to {obtain} an inheritance {which is} imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."Peter’s not speaking of a future salvation, but a future revealing.It’s not a requirement for salvation, but it’s the saved who are to be baptized. Those who believe are to be subsequently baptized. But it’s not the baptism through which God saves them, it’s their belief.It’s those who have become “disciples” that are then baptized.

Interesting that Paul should make this statement about the Apostolic ministry Christ commissioned to him:1 Cor 1:17 "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void.Through the years the act of baptism has essentially replaced faith (e.g., infant baptism), and the cross of Jesus Christ, in much of Christendom, has been made void.
Moondweller,
Your interpretations astound me. You can take something that is clearly written and try to make it sound like it says exactly the opposite. In John 3: 5 It says:
Jesus answered, "Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.
But you read right over the word water and deny that baptism is first.

What was the first thing Paul does after he regains his sight after his vision of Jesus on the road to Damascus?, He is baptized.

What is the first thing that Jesus does in his ministry? He is baptized.
 
But in conjunction with salvation and justification, faith is stated alone:Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith;"

Rom 3:22 “even {the} righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe;”

Rom 3:27-28 "Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law.

Rom 3:30 “…since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”

Rom 4:5 “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,”

Rom 4:13 “For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.”

Rom 4:16 "For this reason {it is} by faith, in order that {it may be} in accordance with grace,

Gal 3:2 "This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of law, or by hearing with faith?

Gal 3:6-7 "Even so Abraham believed God, and it (his faith) was reckoned to him as righteousness. Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.

Gal 3:9 "So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer.

Gal 3:23-24 “But before faith came, we were kept in custody under law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.”“By faith” is always stated alone. It is not in the least bit a stretch to conclude that according to the Scriptures salvation and justification are based on faith alone.The context is demonstrating one’s faith through works. See Ja. 2:18. The difference between a mere “said” faith and a true faith. James must be understood in context.Actually, based on just what I’ve posted above (and those are just a few), it’s you who ignore a whole lot of Scripture.
All of those statements say that Faith is important. The references in Romans, Hebrews and Galations are actually meant to show that works ALONE are insufficient and that you need Faith in Jesus as well. This was defending the faith against the Jews. Afterall, if works alone were required, there would be no benefit to becoming a Christian.

But there is an equally lengthly list of statements that say works are required for eternal life. We’ve given you them before and perhaps someone will take it upon themselves to compile a list to mirror yours. But you know about Matt 7:21-21, Mathew 19: 16-19 and Matthew 25: 31-46 for starters. In any case, just as WORKS ALONE are insufficient, so to is FAITH alone insufficient. Even the demons Jesus expelled in the Gospels acknowledged him as the son of God, yet they were still expelled from the presence of God because they did not do his will.

Finally, There are also a number of passages that show the linkage between the two and that BOTH are required. James chapter 2 comes readily to mind. This is the position that harmonizes the whole Bible and that which the Church has always taught to be the truth.
 
Hi, moondweller,

Thank you for your thoughtful response.

Now, as you probably guessed … we are not really on the same page on this matter - but, let me ask you a question here based on your statement below…
"… Peter speaks of being “born again,” and not in reference to baptism either:
1 Pet 1:3 “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope (how? through baptism? No) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead…”

As I see it, Christ set us on a course to eternal glory with Him in Heaven. He set down the rules and He is the goal.

Now, the rules are really quite straight forward: 1.) obey the commands He gave us - and, one of those commands is to 2.)obey the Church He established with Peter - the Rock- as it’s foundation and with Christ as the Corner Stone.

Christ never said Faith alone - evern though Faith is very important! Really, you need more then Faith if you are be with Christ in Heaven. The Devils believe that Christ is God and that does not get them out of Hell! Those who fail to act on the Faith they have will not do well at God’ Judgment Seat.

So, here is the question. It seems to me that you want to reduce everything to Faith - is this true?

God bless​
 
Do Catholics believe that works save them?
No, Bramble, we don’t. We believe that Jesus Christ saves us, and that he’s the judge in these matters. What presumption adheres to this question, “Who is saved?” None of us, Catholic or Protestant, know the answer. Christ is the judge.
 
40.png
broski234:
I agree with those passages 100%. But nowhere does it say what you are trying to make it say.
I’m not trying to “make” them say anything. They speak for themselves.
Yes faith is very important in the salvation process.
In Scripture salvation is not described as a “process,” but a divine “gift” upon faith in Christ:Eph. 2:8-9 "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, the gift of God; not as a result of works…"The words “have been” are not congruent with your “process” concept.Titus 3:5 “He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit,”“He saved us…” reflects a one time act of God. And we know that according to the Scriptures that this He did at the time of personal faith in Jesus Christ:Acts 16:30-31 “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” They said, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved,"Paul and his companions didn’t say to the jailer, “You will begin the process of salvation.” Peter at the council in Jerusalem said:Acts 15:7 After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, "Brethren, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear the word of the gospel and believe…and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are."The issue was saved by faith plus conformity to the Law or else saved by faith alone. The latter prevailed. This was Paul’s gospel message to the Gentiles:Gal 3:22-24 "But the Scripture has shut up everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. Therefore the Law has become our tutor {to lead us} to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.The true believer is now “created (past tense) in Christ Jesus FOR good works” that he should walk in them (Eph. 2:10), but he is not being “created in Christ Jesus” BY those works. The walking in good works is present tense, but “created” in Christ (the “Last Adam”) is a past, completed action on God’s part at the time of true belief:2 Tim 1:8-9 “Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord or of me His prisoner, but join with {me} in suffering for the gospel according to the power of God (the cross), who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity.”

Salvation in the Scriptures is a divine undertaking for the believer from his deliverance out of the lost estate to his final presentation in glory conformed to the image of Christ. Since the divine objective is thus all-inclusive, the theme is divided naturally into three tenses: (1) PAST, when he believed (Acts 16:30-31; Eph. 2:8; 2 Tim. 1:8-9; Titus 3:5); an unchanging FACT. The believer, at the time of faith was completely delivered from his lost estate, cleansed, forgiven, justified, born of God, clothed in the merit of Christ, freed from all condemnation and safe for evermore. That’s what “saved” means. (2) PRESENT, the believer is being saved (kept by grace) from the dominion of sin, divinely preserved and sanctified through the High Priestly work of the risen Christ (Heb. 7:25). (3) FUTURE, the believer is yet to be saved from the presence of sin when presented faultless and glorified (bodily) in glory (Phil. 3:20-21).

Catholicism errs in that it confounds sanctification and justification/salvation, rendering the word “saved” completely meaningless.
Look at Romans 2:6-7. It says quite clearly that God will render to every man according to his faith? NO! According to his works.
Yes. But in context those in vs. 7 are BELIEVERS; those in vs. 8 are UNBELIEVERS. The saved will receive “rewards” for any works that are of value (1 Cor. 3:10-15). But the believer’s salvation was gifted “by grace through faith…not as a result of works” (Eph. 2:8-9). IOW, it’s not a “reward” for works well done, but a divine gift according to infinite GRACE.
Well, let me bring to your attention Galations 5:6. St. Paul says it is faith working through love that saves us.
Yes, but it’s through FAITH that God saves; love is the fruit of the Spirit who now indwells the saved. The reason the Holy Spirit can now indwell the saved is because they’ve been redeemed, forgiven and cleansed (purged) of ALL sins through Christ’s sacrificial death (Heb. 1:3).

As for the James two passage, Catholicism fails to interpret it in context. It’s been discussed by me and others on this forum many, many times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top