Someone explain again why Ecclesia Dei is ignored by friends and members of SSPX?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jehanne_Darc
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

AGREED.
Now, What are “their teachings”, I mean, an example of what they are teaching.
For instance.
“listened to the teachings at an SSPX mass” which were (are) as follows:
(You finish it.)
For fear of being repetitive…uh…read some of the posts…maybe some of your own?:o
 
Unfortunately the infection really is contagious:eek:
You may need to get that looked at:p

I fear for my soul daily…Satan does go about like a roaring lion seeking souls to devour…
Fear is a sign of weakness.
 
Mary, I think I just pointed out there was no “spirit of dissent” at the Mass where I heard the homily given by Bishop Tissier.
The spirit of dissent was there…

If you were there knowing what the Church teaches about attending these illicit masses…
yes indeed it was there…
 
The spirit of dissent was there…

If you were there knowing what the Church teaches about attending these illicit masses…
yes indeed it was there…
The faithful are allowed to attend the SSPX masses out of love for the ancient rite. I was there knowing the Church teaches that.

And just for the record, I had the approval of my NO priest to go.
 
Unfortunately the infection really is contagious:eek:
You may need to get that looked at:p

I fear for my soul daily…Satan does go about like a roaring lion seeking souls to devour…
From your post…I thought it was fear of the Devil.

Peter said to be on guard regarding the devil as a roaring lion.
 
The faithful are allowed to attend the SSPX masses out of love for the ancient rite. I was there knowing the Church teaches that.

And just for the record, I had the approval of my NO priest to go.
So you follow when it is what you want to hear…but otherwise…:eek:

Regarding the case’s implications for other Catholics, “formal adherence” implies “full knowledge” and “complete consent” in embracing this grave action (cf. Catechism, nos. 1856-61). Yet, today some people advance interpretations of the above decrees and canons in opposition to the Holy Father’s explicit position, even asking whether one may fulfill his Sunday obligation by attending a Mass offered by priests of the SSPX. But given the above facts, one would be acting at best on a doubtful conscience in attending any Mass of the SSPX and a fundamental principle of moral theology is that one may never act on a doubtful conscience. Further, one is bound to form his conscience according to authentic Catholic doctrine and discipline.

Taken from the following link;cuf.org/faithfacts/details_view.asp?ffID=132
 
From your post…I thought it was fear of the Devil.

Peter said to be on guard regarding the devil as a roaring lion.
Um…your point being…:confused:

Fear of the lord leads to Wisdom…
Wisdom helps us to fear that second death that separates us from God eternally…
Satan comes in to play hereabouts…oh wee one…:cool:
 
The spirit of dissent was there…

If you were there knowing what the Church teaches about attending these illicit masses…
yes indeed it was there…
The Church teaches Ecumenism. I visit the SSPX on a regular basis. It called Ecumenating. The very same as those who collaborate with the E-Orthodox. Since we have so much in common, I emphasize what we agree on.
BTW:
I missed the name of the Parishes that you avow are Latin Ordinary, Gregorian Chant Parishes…
I did a web search and didn’t get much.
I thought that St Thomas Aquinas…Ca…was a college, not a parish. Did I miss something?
I did find one in Virginia. It also serves a College of you guessed, St Thomas Aq. College.
Then there was one, I think, in Madison WI which recently burned down.
Then again, comes:
St. Thomas Aquinas Church, in Palo Alto, Ca.
My search was:“Gregorian Chant”+“Sunday Mass”
Any other search ideas?
So far I got 2 St T Aq colleges & 1 burned cathedral in WI and another St Thomas Aq. (my Namesake BTW), in CA…
So, left to my own devices, it seems I found 2 of about 15,000 parishes.
 
So you follow when it is what you want to hear…but otherwise…:eek:

Regarding the case’s implications for other Catholics, “formal adherence” implies “full knowledge” and “complete consent” in embracing this grave action (cf. Catechism, nos. 1856-61). Yet, today some people advance interpretations of the above decrees and canons in opposition to the Holy Father’s explicit position, even asking whether one may fulfill his Sunday obligation by attending a Mass offered by priests of the SSPX. But given the above facts, one would be acting at best on a doubtful conscience in attending any Mass of the SSPX and a fundamental principle of moral theology is that one may never act on a doubtful conscience. Further, one is bound to form his conscience according to authentic Catholic doctrine and discipline.

Taken from the following link;cuf.org/faithfacts/details_view.asp?ffID=132
There is another document that is on my other computer, so I can’t access it right now, 'cause I’m at work, but I bet someone else can pull it up to show you that we are allowed to go to the SSPX Masses out of love for the TLM. If not, I’ll post it tomorrow.
 
There is another document that is on my other computer, so I can’t access it right now, 'cause I’m at work, but I bet someone else can pull it up to show you that we are allowed to go to the SSPX Masses out of love for the TLM. If not, I’ll post it tomorrow.
Dear one…the Mass and the sacraments offered by SSPX are illicit…
Your love cannot change that.
The Sacrament of Confession is INVALID…your love cannot change that.
 
Mary, I think I just pointed out there was no “spirit of dissent” at the Mass where I heard the homily given by Bishop Tissier.
That’s a complete contradiciton. Every Mass they offer is an act of disobedience and dissent, because they possess no faculties to licitly offer the Mass.
 
The Church teaches Ecumenism. I visit the SSPX on a regular basis. It called Ecumenating. The very same as those who collaborate with the E-Orthodox. Since we have so much in common, I enphasize what we agree on.
BTW:
I missed the name of the Parishes that you avow are Latin Ordinary, Gregorian Chant Parishes…
I did a web search and didn’t get much.
I thought that St Thomas Aquinas…Ca…was a college, not a parish. Did I miss something?
I did find one in Virginia. It also serves a College of you guessed, St Thomas Aq. College.
Then there was one, I think, in Madison WI which recently burned down.
My search was:“Gregorian Chant”+“Sunday Mass”
Any other search ideas?
So far I got 2 St T Aq colleges & 1 burned cathedral in WI.
When I do my searches for a Parish in good standing I look at the bulletins…see how they treat Perpetual Adoration…see what books they use for CCD…
common…be a little more resourceful:rolleyes:
 
There is another document that is on my other computer, so I can’t access it right now, 'cause I’m at work, but I bet someone else can pull it up to show you that we are allowed to go to the SSPX Masses out of love for the TLM. If not, I’ll post it tomorrow.
Ah, Msgr. Perle’s letter. It STILL does not say what you and others alledge, in fact it specifically states that the congregation from whom the letter was solicited cannot recommend attendance.

Here’s are more accurate posts regarding the SSPX:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=135003
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=85351
 
When I do my searches for a Parish in good standing I look at the bulletins…see how they treat Perpetual Adoration…see what books they use for CCD…
common…be a little more resourceful:rolleyes:
It sounds like you did more than coin the word ecumenating:eek:
 
Well kido’s,
My 'ole body is crying for some sleep!
You are ever in my prayers:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top