D
dscath
Guest
Isn’t “some say” or “many people have said” the mantra of Trump?The “ source” is like “ some say”
Isn’t “some say” or “many people have said” the mantra of Trump?The “ source” is like “ some say”
Here’s another ridiculous quote from Trump during an interview on July 9 with Chris Wallace: "We’re signing a health-care plan within two weeks, a full and complete health-care plan.” It’s been more than two weeks and Trump still has no health care plan even though his administration is trying to convince the Supreme Court to scrap the Affordable Care Act which would leave millions of people with no health care coverage.“It is what it is”
Today, when discussing children going to school.
“My view is the schools should open,” Trump said. “This thing is going away. It will go away like things go away, and my view is that schools should be open.”
I just can’t.
But, he bragged about remembering “Person, woman, man, camera, TV”.
An argument of pure emotion, not actual facts.said none of the family, friends, or loved ones of 157,000 Americans
BINGO 12345Isn’t “some say” or “many people have said” the mantra of Trump?
And he views everything through the lens of how it makes him look.Regarding the Topic: He never will grasp it. He’s views everything through the lens of economics.
I’d be fine debating the merits - or lack thereof - of Trump’s pandemic response. But bad journalism is bad journalism, and that’s what we’re getting here.No, observation of his actions and the actions of the federal government are evidence.
A very long long long time.They are reporting an article based on unnamed insider sources. That’s been a part of journalism for a very long time.
Know the difference between on the record, off the record and deep background, and honor them . If a source wishes to be kept confidential, you should not disclose their identity to anyone except in certain extreme circumstances. Compromising such relationships can greatly harm your credibility moving forward.
Note the straw man nature of this comment, casting the opponent into an unreasonable position the opponent never took. Two points off for team RR.pnewton:![]()
If I think the schools should remain closed indefinitely and won’t go through a drive-in even if the people wear gloves, and if I quit my job to avoid Covid and if I think every business should be locked down, then I’m necessarily going to think Trump is unduly casual about the Covid hazard.if you think he does not grasp the severity of the COVID spread in America
Then you would be mistaken. Unless you admit that the known vulnerable is just about everyone.On the other hand, if I think the hazard is limited to the known vulnerable,…
He is doing a few things right now, as opposed to earlier on when he did practically everything wrong. But he is still sending mixed messages and undercutting his own pandemic response team.I am going to think Trump is doing about what he ought to be doing, particularly in ensuring sufficient equipment and providing unprecedented funding for treatments and vaccines.
This is the fallacy that all medical opinions are equally valid.And, of course, there are medical opinions all over the place…
As Helen Parr said to Violet “I know what I said. Listen to what I am saying now!”including opinions of some that have changed at least once.
Nothing. Not sure where this idea came from, but there are currently five vaccines in phase III trials worldwide (only one is American). The three vaccine candidates furthest along in their phase III trials are NOT American (i.e. it is very likely that the first approved vaccine will NOT be developed in the US).What exactly is Trump doing that is going to cause a vaccine to be ready three years earlier than I would expect it?
You counting Kodak which all of a sudden decided to go into medical research?only one is American
Yeah . . . that deal will probably just getting people fined and maybe sent to jail. Did you see the story on the stock options issued right before the deal was announced?You counting Kodak which all of a sudden decided to go into medical research?
I can’t even do a hypothetical without incurring the penalties of Leaf? I know people who are even more cautious than I described. I imagine you do too. There are going to be a lot of books and course materials bought by all the home schoolers who never did it before. My point was, and you know it, was and is that anybody who is already at an extreme on the “protecting against Covid” spectrum is necessarily going to think Trump is not adequately addressing it. People who don’t hold that view won’t.Note the straw man nature of this comment, casting the opponent into an unreasonable position the opponent never took.