T
triumphguy
Guest
“Ma’am, put the cat down, and step away from the toilet… step away from the toilet.”Obviously you don’t have children. How do you have a civil conversation with a two year old trying to put the cat in the toilet?![]()
“Ma’am, put the cat down, and step away from the toilet… step away from the toilet.”Obviously you don’t have children. How do you have a civil conversation with a two year old trying to put the cat in the toilet?![]()
It is far better that my children learn to associate pain with wrongdoing early then to realize that reality at judgement.You would physically harm a two-year old with no sense of right or wrong? I find that cruel
Yes, because anyone that doesn’t hit/spank their children are raising narcissistic brats that don’t respect life or believe in God.Had this all happened today, my teacher would be fired (and appear on Fox news), my dad would be arrested for abuse of a minor and I would be taken from a loving home and “re-educated” to conform with acceptable modern standards. Oh, and God would be taught as a myth just like Thor and Zeus.
My, have we progressed!
No, only those that place judgement upon a perfectly acceptable form of punishment.Yes, because anyone that doesn’t hit/spank their children are raising narcissistic brats that don’t respect life or believe in God.![]()
Like I said, if the Dr. Spock method worked…why are there so many problems with our youth? I don’t remember there being school shootings in my parents, grandparents, great-grandparents ect ect.What a load of nonsense.
Don’t ban smacking, we banned it down here and now we’re really in the kaka, parents are being dragged into the courts for smacking their kids and other families are loosing custody.
All the while we still have monsters beating their children with jug cords and putting them in dryers.
Some kids just don’t get the message with “civil conversations”. Kids don’t act or think rationally. Some may, and some may respond to a “civil conversation” but some kids don’t, some kids only understand a whack on the backside.
I was smacked, so was my brother, we both turned out fine, no mental illness,both well educated, both good jobs. My sister pulled the “if you smack me I’ll call the child services”. What happened to her? Dope. Booze. Dropped out of school. Pregnant at 18.
There is a direct correlation between the two. Why do you think Asians outperform every other group in school? It is because they are deathly afraid of their parents, just like I was. You know we are sliding down a slope when you see stuff like this spammed all over the place. Parents are no longer the confident authority figures and protectors they once were. Now it is chic to let your child decide instead of telling them what to do. It is now the norm negotiate and ask instead of telling them what to do. In short Dr. Spock tells us not to be parents but buddies, and it has ruined generations of kids.Yes, because anyone that doesn’t hit/spank their children are raising narcissistic brats that don’t respect life or believe in God.![]()
Evil cat spanks child!Obviously you don’t have children. How do you have a civil conversation with a two year old trying to put the cat in the toilet?![]()
Note the extreme cases they included with children who were spanked. Anyone without an agenda would have the brains to separate sexually abused kids, kids from violent homes, and such, from others. This extremely biased an ill-devised study did not study spanking. It incorporated a multitude of true high risk factors in with those who spanked and drew a false conclusion from this garbage of a method.We’re not talking about just a tap on the bum," study author Tracie Afifi, PhD, of the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, explained in a statement. “We were looking at people who used physical punishment as a regular means to discipline their children.” However, the analysis excluded individuals who reported more severe maltreatment such as physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, or exposure to intimate partner violence.
Norway is in even worse condition - the kids know they have the weapon against ANY discipline and they are AWFUL. Same outlawing of spanking there. I knew a lovely Norwegian woman and she was so complimentary of our young people, said they are so polite and well mannered, and in Norway the young folks are by and large selfish louts if not outright criminals.What a load of nonsense.
Don’t ban smacking, we banned it down here and now we’re really in the kaka, parents are being dragged into the courts for smacking their kids and other families are loosing custody.
All the while we still have monsters beating their children with jug cords and putting them in dryers.
Some kids just don’t get the message with “civil conversations”. Kids don’t act or think rationally. Some may, and some may respond to a “civil conversation” but some kids don’t, some kids only understand a whack on the backside.
I was smacked, so was my brother, we both turned out fine, no mental illness,both well educated, both good jobs. My sister pulled the “if you smack me I’ll call the child services”. What happened to her? Dope. Booze. Dropped out of school. Pregnant at 18.
Natural consequences FTW! LOLEvil cat spanks child!See here:
youtube.com/watch?v=MgBLXFg4cyE&feature=related
This cat doesn’t know how to have a civil conversation with the child who keeps pulling its tail?
Quickly, bring in the shrinks! The child has been traumatized by the spanking! :bighanky:
…but he learned to leave the cat’s tail alone, I bet!![]()
So true of agenda driven research, it isn’t science it is advocacy and very bad at that.Okay, here is why I don’t believe anything reported as research. I tried to find anything in the original research to explain why this result is so skewed away from common sense. I found only one statement, but I think it explains that this rather poor scientific study came up with its conclusion:
Note the extreme cases they included with children who were spanked. Anyone without an agenda would have the brains to separate sexually abused kids, kids from violent homes, and such, from others. This extremely biased an ill-devised study did not study spanking. It incorporated a multitude of true high risk factors in with those who spanked and drew a false conclusion from this garbage of a method.
Dear vera dicere,What a load of nonsense.
Don’t ban smacking, we banned it down here and now we’re really in the kaka, parents are being dragged into the courts for smacking their kids and other families are loosing custody.
All the while we still have monsters beating their children with jug cords and putting them in dryers.
Some kids just don’t get the message with “civil conversations”. Kids don’t act or think rationally. Some may, and some may respond to a “civil conversation” but some kids don’t, some kids only understand a whack on the backside.
I was smacked, so was my brother, we both turned out fine, no mental illness,both well educated, both good jobs. My sister pulled the “if you smack me I’ll call the child services”. What happened to her? Dope. Booze. Dropped out of school. Pregnant at 18.
Certainly not. Nor are people who have used judicious spanking as a form of discipline or punishment actually abusing their child, or raising mentally unstable sociopaths.Yes, because anyone that doesn’t hit/spank their children are raising narcissistic brats that don’t respect life or believe in God.![]()
But but but Lifesitenews distorts their headlines and is automatically ignored. Thus, will people lapping up this garbage study agree to disgard it too?Okay, here is why I don’t believe anything reported as research. I tried to find anything in the original research to explain why this result is so skewed away from common sense. I found only one statement, but I think it explains that this rather poor scientific study came up with its conclusion:
Note the extreme cases they included with children who were spanked. Anyone without an agenda would have the brains to separate sexually abused kids, kids from violent homes, and such, from others. This extremely biased an ill-devised study did not study spanking. It incorporated a multitude of true high risk factors in with those who spanked and drew a false conclusion from this garbage of a method.
Ooops?What do you tell the cat?