SPLIT: Catholics have no assurance of salvation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bengoshi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, but I haven’t done that. I live according to the teachings of the Catholic Church, to the best of my ability. When I sin seriously, I get to confession immediately.

And I have done (and continue to do) that. So why am I not assured of my salvation? Where’s the ambiguity come in?
You are assured of your salvation if you keep it up, but you must be in the state of grace at death. The point is you have no guarantee of heaven if you fail to persist in the faith. There are many Protestants, particularly evangelicals and Calvinists, who believe that by predestination or by declaring belief in Jesus, that they will go to heaven regardless of their behavior on earth.
 
almost. Keep in mind im not as good at this as Jimmy Aken.

Temporal Salvation saves us from temperal penalty. Eternal salvation saves us from eternal penalty.

Sorry not doinng it much justice but you really should read his book.
I guess I’ve never come across anyone who described it this way. And frankly, its a confusing way to put it. it effectively renames indulgences as temporal salvation. I think this is a Jimmy Akin definition to try to explain indulgences in a way that Protestants might understand.

Maybe so.

But I an see that the old testament does refer to salvation in both aspects. We dont tend to do that with the New Testament.
 
You are assured of your salvation if you keep it up, but you must be in the state of grace at death. The point is you have no guarantee of heaven if you fail to persist in the faith. There are many Protestants, particularly evangelicals and Calvinists, who believe that by predestination or by declaring belief in Jesus, that they will go to heaven regardless of their behavior on earth.
Yeah, that makes perfect sense to me. But there’s no small number of Catholics who say that at any given moment, we can’t know if we’re in a state of grace, and that really puzzles me.
 
Yeah, that makes perfect sense to me. But there’s no small number of Catholics who say that at any given moment, we can’t know if we’re in a state of grace, and that really puzzles me.
While Ideally you should know, because it is a requirement to be in the state of grace to recieve communion.
 
While Ideally you should know, because it is a requirement to be in the state of grace to recieve communion.
I don’t think “ideally” has anything to do with it. I think it’s utterly impossible to be in a state of mortal sin and not know it. I’m trying to figure out what, if anything, I’m missing.
 
Seems to me that this is no assurance at all. If this is the requirement, then you can never be assured of heaven until you die. This is exactly what Catholics believe. However, this is not what you ave been espousing. You have been clearly saying that you ARE saved and that you ARE assured of heaven… This denies the perseverance of the Saints. What do you really believe?
Exactly! You are correct. There are lists of mortal sins in scripture: 1 Cor 6:9-10, Eph 5:5-6, Gal 5:19-21. Notice: With all of these it says you will not obtain the Kingdom of God - that is the definition of mortal sin. This was written to Christians.
 
I don’t think “ideally” has anything to do with it. I think it’s utterly impossible to be in a state of mortal sin and not know it. I’m trying to figure out what, if anything, I’m missing.
Probably right. Although some people’s consciences have become dull…
 
Knowingly avoiding confession of ‘venial sins’ to a priest amounts to willful rejection of theological virtues
greetings all,

I have only read the first few pages or so but Pitcharan, this troubled me a bit as I tend towards scrupulosity. As I understand, we are only required to confess mortal sins by kind and number, but the Church reccomends confessing venial sins. If I am understanding you correctly, to purposefully avoid confessing venial sins amounts to grave matter. Therefore, to do it with full knowledge and intentionally would be a mortal sin. This doesn’t seem right…
 
I don’t think “ideally” has anything to do with it. I think it’s utterly impossible to be in a state of mortal sin and not know it. I’m trying to figure out what, if anything, I’m missing.
I totally disagree with this. Let me give you an example: Say you’re masturbating, after trying hard to resist. You used to masturbate frequently but stopped for about a month, then succumbed to the sin again.

You know the sin is grave, but were you addicted or not? Did your trying to resist the sin lessen your culpability or not? You don’t know if it’s mortal.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t go to a Priest either way, you absolutely should, but there’s a perfect example of a sin that may or may not be mortal.
 
I totally disagree with this. Let me give you an example: Say you’re masturbating, after trying hard to resist. You used to masturbate frequently but stopped for about a month, then succumbed to the sin again.

You know the sin is grave, but were you addicted or not? Did your trying to resist the sin lessen your culpability or not? You don’t know if it’s mortal.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t go to a Priest either way, you absolutely should, but there’s a perfect example of a sin that may or may not be mortal.
But that goes the opposite way. You’re describing a sin which is probably mortal, but due to mitigating circumstances might be venial. So you’re right, you might incorrectly think you’re in mortal sin when you’re not. I’m talking about a situation where a person thinks they’re in a state of grace, but to their surprise turn out to be in a state of mortal sin. Whoops!
 
But that goes the opposite way. You’re describing a sin which is probably mortal, but due to mitigating circumstances might be venial. So you’re right, you might incorrectly think you’re in mortal sin when you’re not. I’m talking about a situation where a person thinks they’re in a state of grace, but to their surprise turn out to be in a state of mortal sin. Whoops!
Hmmm…you ask several friends of mine, they know that missing Church is “technically” (paraphrasing them, not my words) a mortal sin, but they find the teaching ridiculous and don’t follow it. So if a Priest asked them for their mortal sins, this would probably not be mentioned.
 
During the time the NT was written, the Church wasn’t called “Catholic” yet. In fact, they were first called “Chritstians” at Antioch (Acts 11:26).
On the contrary, Bengoshi, that is exactly when this term developed to describe the Church. It first appears in Luke 9:31, and was in regular use by the time the Gospel of John was written at the end of the first century. Why would it be a problem if the NT Church was Catholic?

Around the year A.D. 107, a bishop, St. Ignatius of Antioch in the Near East, was arrested, brought to Rome by armed guards and eventually martyred there in the arena. In a farewell letter which this early bishop and martyr wrote to his fellow Christians in Smyrna (today Izmir in modern Turkey), he made the first written mention in history of “the Catholic Church.” He wrote, “Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church” (To the Smyrnaeans 8:2). Thus, the second century of Christianity had scarcely begun when the name of the Catholic Church was already in use.

ewtn.com/faith/teachings/churb3.htm
 
Originally Posted by Philthy forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_khaki/viewpost.gif
So, just to be clear, if we are among those who are saved who somehow do no good works, our experience in Heaven will be completely void of reward?
It is simply impossible for those who have been truly saved by the grace of God through Jesus Christ to not do good works. The good works are evidence of a Christian’s faith.
So, just to be clear, if it is “impossible for those who have been truly saved by the grace of God through Jesus to not do good works” and “good works are evidence of a Christian’s faith”, it then follows that the absence of good works are evidence of a lack of faith and a lack of being truly saved? Yes or No, please, followed by any commentary you wish to add.

Blessings!
 
OK, this is what confuses me… my BF is Catholic and he says that no one can know for certain who is in heaven or hell unless they are a saint. Anyone at the last minute, even after committing mortal sin, can repent and be forgiven, even if that is not done sacramentally. Is he right?
 
Thanks everyone for this conversation. I learned a few things.

About salvation without faith. Hmm as much I would like to believe in it , it sounds fishy. . If we would be save by faith alone then a lot of people would be saved. Or would they?

(it depends how do you intrepret faith)

I have faith that Jesus Christ is God and our saviour. But with that faith I believe when he says that the road is narrow and that we should obey the commandmens. Because if I BELIEVE in him I believe in what he teaches and I will do as He says.

Yes I also agree that there is not a one good bone in me. I know by my sins and sinning that I am pathetic and not capable of doing a single good dead. But through God grace I am able, but even when I have grace I may choose to deny it and continue my sinfull ways.

I am sorry if my view is a little ignorant but I still have much to learn feel fre to correct me. 👍
 
Question: The Bible teaches that as a Christian, when we die we receive different degrees of rewards in heaven. And, I’d like to know if you could expound on those different degrees…

Answer by Dr. John MacArthur:
… There will be varying degrees of reward in heaven. That shouldn’t surprise us: there are varying degrees of giftedness even here on earth.
 
OK, this is what confuses me… my BF is Catholic and he says that no one can know for certain who is in heaven or hell unless they are a saint. Anyone at the last minute, even after committing mortal sin, can repent and be forgiven, even if that is not done sacramentally. Is he right?
Well, the fact is, we simply don’t know who is in heaven or hell, other than the Saints. We know the saints are in heaven through the miracles they work.

So how is it that we don’t know? Well, we are not God. It is not ours to judge and we can’t read a person’s soul.

That said, we have been assured that if we die in the state of Grace, we will go to heaven.and that requires the sacraments. So we know how to get to heaven.

We also know that those that turn from God in life are in fact choosing Hell.

But what of those that that turn to God in the very last seconds of their life and are truly sorry for their sins, , not because of the potential of punishment but because they realize that they love God and are sorry for having offending him? Will God accept them back as the father did in the story of the Prodigal son? I would think the answer is yes. This is what is referred to as perfect contrition. In this article from the Catholic Encyclopedia (page down to the section on Perfect contrition without the sacraments) (newadvent.org/cathen/04337a.htm it says that if you are perfectly contrite and desire the sacrament of reconciliation but are physically kept from doing so (like in the last moments of your life), you are instantly returned to the state of grace Iand thus can enter heaven). So there is hope for everyone…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top