(SPLIT) Mike Gendron's "Who Holds the Keys?"

  • Thread starter Thread starter crochet_lady
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well – ya’ll continue to discuss ‘whatever’ amongst yourselves, because there are so many different views just amongst You folks, I get ‘dizzy’ Enjoy 2014 🙂
Actually, all the Catholics on this thread are in complete agreement, except Lion Heart, whom I don’t believe to really be Catholic.

We started this thread to discuss Church authority, yet you keep trying to avoid answering us.
 
Lion Heart #153 :)👍
Just because a couple of Catholics have a difference of opinion in no way indicts the truths of the Catholic faith. This is all part of what we call our “journey of faith”, because no one becomes a Christian knowing and understanding all there is about Christianity. Truth doesn’t change and all of us are always seeking the fullness of truth.

However, the Catholic Church plainly speaks out on faith and morals and has done so for the 2,000 years of Christianity’s existence. unlike you and most all of the rest of n-Cs everywhere, we actually have a Biblically based and Christ founded church that can speak out definitively and with authority in Christ’s name.

The truths so defined are unequivocal and even if some people question or disagree, they do not change because they come from God…and God does not change.
Well – ya’ll continue to discuss ‘whatever’ amongst yourselves, because there are so many different views just amongst You folks, I get ‘dizzy’ Enjoy 2014 🙂
You think that this dismissal of our time spent in seeking to answer your questions and supply you with facts is righteous?

Actually it’s pretty clear what has now happened with you. You came here, to our online Catholic home, and expected that your “witnessing” would devastate the faith of us poor, blind, and Biblically ignorant Catholics and we would be converted away from our most holy faith. Yet what has happened is that you soon discovered that few of us are as Biblically and historically ignorant as you expected and our responses have proved more challenging than you can handle, so now you dismiss it all and “declare victory” with this condescending parting shot.

Always remember Lady…anytime you seek to evangelize/proselytize us, you also open yourself up to our counter-evangelism, and if you can’t handle that, then maybe your particular gospel message is somehow different or less convincing than you presume it is. Consider: Who REALLY Preaches “A Different Gospel”?
Actually, all the Catholics on this thread are in complete agreement, except Lion Heart, whom I don’t believe to really be Catholic.

We started this thread to discuss Church authority, yet you keep trying to avoid answering us.
Good points both, though it’s hard to tell an online ringer. We do get them sometimes…I have always wondered how anyone who names themselves a Christian could be comfortable with that kind of deception in the name of their religion.

I’m not saying that about LH, but it is a possibility and I’ve seen it before.

Your last point is also very good. For someone who supposedly knows and believes her Bible CL has really been terribly lacking in her expressions of her beliefs and some of what she’s said really does not jibe with most of the n-Cs I have ever encountered…and I was one for about 35 years.
 
Well – ya’ll continue to discuss ‘whatever’ amongst yourselves, because there are so many different views just amongst You folks, I get ‘dizzy’ Enjoy 2014 🙂
I would get dizzy as well, truth has a habit of doing that. Been there done that and got the t-shirt.

Au revoir.
 
Actually it’s pretty clear what has now happened with you. You came here, to our online Catholic home, and expected that your “witnessing” would devastate the faith of us poor, blind, and Biblically ignorant Catholics and we would be converted away from our most holy faith. Yet what has happened is that you soon discovered that few of us are as Biblically and historically ignorant as you expected and our responses have proved more challenging than you can handle, so now you dismiss it all and “declare victory” with this condescending parting shot.
This reminds me of that old Under Armor commercial. “WE MUST PROTECT THIS HOUSE!!!”

I guess that makes us God’s defensive line. 👍
 
Just because a couple of Catholics have a difference of opinion in no way indicts the truths of the Catholic faith. This is all part of what we call our “journey of faith”, because no one becomes a Christian knowing and understanding all there is about Christianity. Truth doesn’t change and all of us are always seeking the fullness of truth.

However, the Catholic Church plainly speaks out on faith and morals and has done so for the 2,000 years of Christianity’s existence. unlike you and most all of the rest of n-Cs everywhere, we actually have a Biblically based and Christ founded church that can speak out definitively and with authority in Christ’s name.

The truths so defined are unequivocal and even if some people question or disagree, they do not change because they come from God…and God does not change.
You think that this dismissal of our time spent in seeking to answer your questions and supply you with facts is righteous?

Actually it’s pretty clear what has now happened with you. You came here, to our online Catholic home, and expected that your “witnessing” would devastate the faith of us poor, blind, and Biblically ignorant Catholics and we would be converted away from our most holy faith. Yet what has happened is that you soon discovered that few of us are as Biblically and historically ignorant as you expected and our responses have proved more challenging than you can handle, so now you dismiss it all and “declare victory” with this condescending parting shot.

Always remember Lady…anytime you seek to evangelize/proselytize us, you also open yourself up to our counter-evangelism, and if you can’t handle that, then maybe your particular gospel message is somehow different or less convincing than you presume it is. Consider: Who REALLY Preaches “A Different Gospel”?Good points both, though it’s hard to tell an online ringer. We do get them sometimes…I have always wondered how anyone who names themselves a Christian could be comfortable with that kind of deception in the name of their religion.

I’m not saying that about LH, but it is a possibility and I’ve seen it before.

Your last point is also very good. For someone who supposedly knows and believes her Bible CL has really been terribly lacking in her expressions of her beliefs and some of what she’s said really does not jibe with most of the n-Cs I have ever encountered…and I was one for about 35 years.
I just want to say that I agree with you whole heartily!!!
 
although crochet lady seems to have opted out, i just wanted to ask those still here, has anyone in this thread explained how an organization can exist without possessing the authority required to ensure it is an organization with a purpose?

i cannot think of any organization that exists without someone or group possessing the authority needed to ensure the organization’s existence.

i would be interested if others can come up with such an organization.

even the most independent of christian organizations, those totally established by a single individual, give a position of authority to someone in the organization.

an organization without authority ceases to exist, at least that is my understanding and experience.

that means that if Jesus did not give His Church authority, He never really even established a Church.
 
although crochet lady seems to have opted out, i just wanted to ask those still here, has anyone in this thread explained how an organization can exist without possessing the authority required to ensure it is an organization with a purpose?

i cannot think of any organization that exists without someone or group possessing the authority needed to ensure the organization’s existence.

i would be interested if others can come up with such an organization.

even the most independent of christian organizations, those totally established by a single individual, give a position of authority to someone in the organization.

an organization without authority ceases to exist, at least that is my understanding and experience.

that means that if Jesus did not give His Church authority, He never really even established a Church.
Great point. For any organization or entity, authority must be held and used by a PERSON, not a book.

As John Martignoni (I think it’s him) likes to compare, in baseball both teams have rulebooks, and know the rules, and YET, an umpire is completely necessary for the game to proceed. A PERSON has to exercise authority.
 
it seems to me that any organization whether large or small would have to have someone or just person to be in authority. A small protestant church has a pastor and he/she would be the authority or else why would one go to a church where a book is the total authority? in other words if the Bible is the sole authority why need a pastor? to say or interpret what ever the Bible says? Otherwise it seems to e that if everyone can decide what the Bible says and there being no agreement who would be right or correct? So in the end someone has to be in charge. But that’s my opinion.
 
Great point. For any organization or entity, authority must be held and used by a PERSON, not a book.

As John Martignoni (I think it’s him) likes to compare, in baseball both teams have rulebooks, and know the rules, and YET, an umpire is completely necessary for the game to proceed. A PERSON has to exercise authority.
The good Fr Barron says something along those lines here:
m.youtube.com/watch?v=RWYwBDqFsuE

I also like to use the analogy of a classroom. If a book is all that’s needed, what’s the point of having teachers? All schools would need to do is provide their students with textbooks and leave them alone; yet, we need teachers to instruct and guide the students.
 
Referring to post 166 / James the Just – the subject was about ‘questioning church authority’. I’ve been Trying to establish what is meant By the “Church”. Defining terms. I’ve agreed with the term ‘Catholic’ meaning ‘universal’. What makes up the ‘universal’ church? Doesn’t the New Testament teach that the New Testament church came into existence with the coming of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit comes to indwell each person who ‘accepts Jesus Christ as personal Savior’. One verse - 2 Corinthians 1:21 " Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He annointed us, set His seal of ownership on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guarenteeing what is to come.
Ephesians 1: 11 - vs 13 " "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation. “Having believed, you were marked in Him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteering our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession – to the praise of His glory.”
Isn’t That stating that God has sealed a person’s salvation with the promised Holy Spirit until the person is with God/ Jesus Christ?
And those people make up the universal ‘church’ / universal meaning all those who have trusted Christ as Savior throughout the world. ‘church’ being the ‘body’/ group of believers.
And that people in communities make up a Local body of believers.

Do we agree so far?

By the Way – Shanpo – I’ve never referred to Any one around here of being a ‘poor, blind, Biblically ignorant Catholic’ – sorry if you find yourself feeling that way.
All I’ve been doing is presenting a different perspective. The Roman Catholic Church isn’t the only belief system existing. And there are Also LOTS of people ‘out there’ who aren’t Baptist – there are also Lutherans, Presbyterians, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons , etc. etc.
I’ve been listening To and Presenting. And you Do realize that even people who Aren’t of the Roman Catholic persuasion Are going to be in heaven. 🙂
 
crochet lady,

in your post #176, you provide your readers with an interpretation of scripture passages.

by what authority do “you” provide this interpretation to the world?

why should people believe “your” interpretation of these passages?

it is a fact that other people interpret the passages you provided differently.

whose interpretations are true and accurate?
 
Referring to post 166 / James the Just – the subject was about ‘questioning church authority’. I’ve been Trying to establish what is meant By the “Church”.
Can we agree that Jesus founded ONE Church?
Defining terms. I’ve agreed with the term ‘Catholic’ meaning ‘universal’. What makes up the ‘universal’ church? Doesn’t the New Testament teach that the New Testament church came into existence with the coming of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit comes to indwell each person who ‘accepts Jesus Christ as personal Savior’.
Do you have a scriptural citation that backs that up, or is it your tradition?
One verse - 2 Corinthians 1:21 " Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He annointed us, set His seal of ownership on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guarenteeing what is to come.
The Corinthians to who Paul is writing have all been baptised.
Ephesians 1: 11 - vs 13 " "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation. “Having believed, you were marked in Him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteering our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession – to the praise of His glory.”
Isn’t That stating that God has sealed a person’s salvation with the promised Holy Spirit until the person is with God/ Jesus Christ?
Compare that with what St. Paul says in Romans, regarding Abraham:

Ro 4:11 He received circumcision as a sign or seal of the righteousness which he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. The purpose was to make him the father of all who believe without being circumcised and who thus have righteousness reckoned to them,

Abraham believed and was righteous BEFORE he was circumcised, but it was circumcision which was the “sign or seal”.

Since St. Paul uses the analogy of circumcision in the OT as being comparable to baptism in the new (Col 2:11-12), the “seal” can be thought of as baptism.
All I’ve been doing is presenting a different perspective. The Roman Catholic Church isn’t the only belief system existing.
True 'nuff. Although it IS the only one started by Jesus.
And you Do realize that even people who Aren’t of the Roman Catholic persuasion Are going to be in heaven. 🙂
True. But that is despite, not because of, their differences with the Catholic Church (note: not Roman Catholic. Please see How Did the Catholic Church Get Her Name?
 
I’ve been Trying to establish what is meant By the “Church”. Defining terms. I’ve agreed with the term ‘Catholic’ meaning ‘universal’. What makes up the ‘universal’ church?
All Catholics (laity & clergy) are a part of the Church, but the hierarchy of the Church is comprised of the Pope and the Bishops in full communion with him.
Doesn’t the New Testament teach that the New Testament church came into existence with the coming of the Holy Spirit.
Yes, but He came upon the Apostles, so that He could protect the Church from error (cf. John 16:13) and to protect her.
The Holy Spirit comes to indwell each person who ‘accepts Jesus Christ as personal Savior’.
Of course! That’s why St Peter said “accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” in Acts 2:38, right? Oh wait, he didn’t say that at all. He said, “repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the forgiveness of sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” The “personal acceptance = Holy Spirit” thing is an 18th/19th century invention of Baptists. That’s why you won’t find that phrase anywhere in the Bible.
One verse - 2 Corinthians 1:21 Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He anointed us, set His seal of ownership on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guarenteeing what is to come.
All that that verse says is that our salvation is 100% by God’s grace. Catholics believe this too.
Ephesians 1: 11 - 13 "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation. “Having believed, you were marked in Him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteering our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession – to the praise of His glory.”
Isn’t That stating that God has sealed a person’s salvation with the promised Holy Spirit until the person is with God/ Jesus Christ?
No. :rolleyes: I’ll leave this to the Haydock Bible Commentary:

Ver. 11. In Christ we also are called by lot; i.e. to this happy lot, this share and state of eternal happiness, (he seems to speak with an allusion to the manner by which the lands of a temporal inheritance was distributed to the Israelites, in Palestine) that we (ver. 12) who are saved, may be to the praise of his glory; might praise God for ever in the kingdom of his glory; particularly we Jews, who before hoped in the Messias to come, and also you Gentiles, who now having heard the gospel, have believed in Christ, and who, together with all Christians, have been now sealed as it were with the holy Spirit of promise; i.e. by the Spirit promised, and all those spiritual graces which are an earnest and pledge, which give us an assurance of our future glory and happiness. For our redemption from our sins, and in order to the acquired possession, to the possession of that glorious happiness which Christ, by his incarnation and death, hath acquired for us. (Witham)

Ver. 13. In whom you…were sealed, &c. Having been regenerated in baptism, you have received the Holy Spirit and the supernatural gifts which he communicates, by which he has, as it were, impressed upon you the seal of your sanctification and the pledge of your salvation. It is not an external impression, such as that by which soldiers are marked by their sovereigns, nor circumcision, as of old, but it is a mark within you—the grace with which you are filled—which shews itself outwardly by miraculous effects, &c. (Calmet) — Some refer these words, in whom you were sealed, to the sacrament of baptism; others to confirmation: both, with the sacrament of holy orders, confer a character, or mark, of which St. Paul seems to speak whenever he speaks of God sealing us.
And those people make up the universal ‘church’ / universal meaning all those who have trusted Christ as Savior throughout the world. ‘church’ being the ‘body’/ group of believers.
This idea that the Church is invisible is incredibly contrary to Scripture.
It entails that the Church is the set of all the elect. But this position runs contrary to Scripture, because we know from Scripture that there will be tares within the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church, until the angels remove them at the end. And yet by definition there can be no tares within the set of the elect (i.e. elect-to-glory). Likewise, when Matthew records Jesus saying to Peter in Matthew 16:18, “upon this rock I will build My Church”, and then saying, in Matthew 18:17, “tell it to the Church”, and “listen to the Church”, the most natural way of understanding these passages is that the term ‘ekklesia’ (‘Church’) is being used in the same way in all three places. And it is clear in the Matthew 18 passages that ‘ekklesia’ there refers to the visible Church, not a merely spiritual entity. Matters of discipline cannot be brought before the set of all the elect. This shows us that the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church of which Christ speaks in Matthew 16 is not a mere set; Jesus was not meaning “upon this Rock I will build my set.”
 
Matthew 16:18-19 "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

What does it mean for Peter to have the keys of the kingdom of heaven? Jesus also gave the authority to bind and loose to the other apostles (Matthew 18:18), so concerning Peter, what is the difference between having the keys of heaven and having the authority to bind and loose?

(I looked at Wikipedia and the Catholic encyclopedia and haven’t got much help, so I would appreciate any response.)

Thanks,

icamhif
 
Same topic threads merged.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Referring to post 166 / James the Just – the subject was about ‘questioning church authority’. I’ve been Trying to establish what is meant By the “Church”. Defining terms. I’ve agreed with the term ‘Catholic’ meaning ‘universal’. What makes up the ‘universal’ church? Doesn’t the New Testament teach that the New Testament church came into existence with the coming of the Holy Spirit.
I thought you were done with us? 🤷

It doesn’t matter what modern men define the church as, but we know for a fact that the early church defined the church as the Catholic Church because we have Ignatius of Antioch, (their bishop no less and a disciple of St. John the Evangelist) plainly saying so in his Epistle to the Smyrnaeans where he says, "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."
The Holy Spirit comes to indwell each person who 'accepts Jesus Christ as personal Savior’
.Problem here is that the New Testament nowhere uses these words and you cannot offer any scripture that does so.
One verse - 2 Corinthians 1:21 " Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He annointed us, set His seal of ownership on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guarenteeing what is to come.
Again, faithful Catholics will say Amen and Alleluia to what that verse says.
Ephesians 1: 11 - vs 13 " "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation. “Having believed, you were marked in Him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteering our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession – to the praise of His glory.”
Isn’t That stating that God has sealed a person’s salvation with the promised Holy Spirit until the person is with God/ Jesus Christ?
You’re getting off topic and into OSAS/Eternal Security here, so I’ll just point out that Revelation 3:5 tells us that our Lord can and will blot some names out of the Book of Life and since being written in it is plainly stated as being saved, that means that salvation can be lost. See also Matthew 25:31-46 for further insight into what it obviously takes to be saved.
And those people make up the universal ‘church’ / universal meaning all those who have trusted Christ as Savior throughout the world. ‘church’ being the ‘body’/ group of believers.
And that people in communities make up a Local body of believers.
Do we agree so far?
Nope and neither does the writings of the early church, which you can very easily read for yourself at Catholic First Information Center, Church Fathers Index and CHURCH FATHERS: Home. Enjoy!👍
By the Way – Shanpo – I’ve never referred to Any one around here of being a ‘poor, blind, Biblically ignorant Catholic’ – sorry if you find yourself feeling that way.
You got that all wrong because I’m the one who used those words. (My stuff’s pretty easy to spot since I use a slightly larger font and it’s always blue in honor of my devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.) I know you never said as much, but you seem to treat us like you feel that way…dismissing us as if we haven’t even responded.

For example, I began this thread with a concise refutation of the article by Mike Gendron that you offered as documentation of your own position, and yet you have never even acted like you read and understood any of it. One would think that if one offers a document that supports one’s beliefs and someone refutes it that one would want to more carefully examine it and perhaps respond…yet you have not.

Notice that we have responded to your every post and argument…yet you seem to feel that you need not do the same with us, which makes it appear that you have nothing that you can offer in support of your beliefs.

We have offered to abundant scripture, in context, that has shown your position and beliefs contrary to it as well as the authentic and verifiable writings of the early church. Most of whom gave their lives as martyrs for what was very clearly a Catholic faith.
All I’ve been doing is presenting a different perspective. The Roman Catholic Church isn’t the only belief system existing. And there are Also LOTS of people ‘out there’ who aren’t Baptist – there are also Lutherans, Presbyterians, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons , etc. etc.
Honesty? What makes you think taht we need “another perspective”? Especially when we have shown you from the Word of God, (again) in context, as well as documents from authentic Christian history, that your beliefs are not anywhere near as scriptural as you seem to think they are.

It’s actually irrelevant how many other people hold opposing opinions if the objective truth contradicts them, then who needs to change their minds and be converted?
I’ve been listening To and Presenting. And you Do realize that even people who Aren’t of the Roman Catholic persuasion Are going to be in heaven.
Possibly, but that’s above our pay grade. We have a mandate from the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:19-20) to share what He has given to us in the hope of making disciples who will also follow Him faithfully.
(Cont’d)
 
The issue here is authority to insure that doctrine is correct and scripture is not misinterpreted. We have a scripturally documented establishment of that authority that has functioned for some 2,000 years. Protestants seek to replace that with their appeal to a Sola Scriptura based view of the Bible, which has resulted in a wide variety of (mis)interpretations that has led to even more errant doctrines that no one in any of the n-C communities has any authority to even begin to correct, which has created tremendous confusion among people who sincerely seek the truth of Christianity. If, as I pointed out before, God is not a god of confusion (as plainly stated in the New Testament), then how can that system be of God? It doesn’t make sense, and it doesn’t work well at all.
 
If that was directed at me, no…I am not here to debate. I’m asking an honest question.
Don’t sweat it my friend. That is directed at all of on this thread, but I can suggest that you go back and read it from the beginning because I’m pretty sure it will answer your question along the way.

You apparently didn’t notice this current thread on the very topic you have a question about, so the mod just merged it in here. We’ll be happy to talk to you and answer your questions, but it may be faster and easier to read through what’s already here and then jump in if you want to.

This isn’t a debate…it’s just a spirited discussion. Debates have a lot more rules.😃

Welcome to CAF!👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top