Staying free from feminist lies

  • Thread starter Thread starter unitive_mystic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Many atheists have very successful marriages too. Should their beliefs be the model for everyone?

The Apostle offers wisdom regarding marriage relationships.

Feminism would not establish a priesthood of only men!
 
Atheists? I am quoting the same chapter of the Bible.
My husband and I submit our desires to each others out of love. Simplle but not always easy.
 
Well, I was about to type that @Mi_Rose said it perfectly…
 
Last edited:
Yes, but Scripture also recognizes the husband as the head.

Not me, not the president, not the feminists, but Sacred Scripture.
 
Last edited:
rcwitness said:
Yes, but Scripture also recognizes the husband as the head.

Not me, not the president, not the feminists, but Sacred Scripture.
Click to expand...
Society, women and feminists will alway “recognise” the father as the provider for the wife and children. ie. use it in selecting a spouse, and chain him to it even if he has little say in the running of the home, or even if he has been removed.

They don’t say it. There is no law which says the man must provide, you don’t hear it in all the endless feminist babble, but they mean it, and you’d better know it, fella.

There are still this and other gender roles, but only where men lose.
 
Last edited:
JulianN said:
Both parents are on for supporting their family—not just men.
Click to expand...
Good for you that you agree and it works for you. There are valid exceptions.

However, in the event of divorce, which is usually initiated by the wife, the husband will lose most of the assets and will be required to pay alimony.

While the divorce laws are ostensibly gender neutral, in practice the husband is expected to provide.

The phrase “deadbeat dads” comes from this expectation.
 
Last edited:
Yup, but what he meant (or rather people who use his words) was that husbands, because they’re the leaders, must sacrifice what he wants unless it’s for the good of the family/wife.

So apparently arguments like what the color of the new carpet should be would be decided by the wife. But then like you said, a loving wife may want her husband to pick a color he’s comfortable with too.

Honestly I find templates for marriage to be ridiculous because it’s all about the individual couple, but that’s another conversation for another day maybe.
 
Last edited:
Because it isn’t, lol. That’s a modern translation by reddit maybe 😂
 
Time to look at the facts.

In the Bible, whenever a name is given, the person giving that name claims authority. God changes Abram’s name to Abraham who then pledges to follow Him. Jesus changes Simon’s name to Peter and makes him His right hand man. Adam was named by God as well. Now, who named the animals after being told he had dominion over them? Who named Eve after God told the first humans, “Yet your desire shall be for your husband and he shall rule over you?”

To strengthen that point God tells Adam that he committed 2 sins, listening to his wife and eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Finally, the Devil’s promise to Eve is essentially similar to modern feminism especially so when atheism is taken into account.

The Devil said, “You will be like God (the most powerful being in existence).”

Modern feminism says, “You will be like men who have hoarded all the power for themselves.”

That is how sin came into the world, because of a woman who rebelled and a man who was too weak to stop her.
 
Last edited:
God and men are not the same though. The first sin is literally not feminism at all. Not to mention God has all the power because it’s rightly his, the same cannot be said for man. Just because it was a woman who rebelled it doesn’t mean that it was feminism. The same sin would have occurred if the devil went after Adam
 
Last edited:
A part of me is turned off by the idea of a Catholic marriage tbh. It sounds exhausting. Of course, I’m not in the mood to go to hell for disobeying 💀
 
Lea101 said:
So apparently arguments like what the color of the new carpet should be would be decided by the wife. But then like you said, a loving wife may want her husband to pick a color he’s comfortable with too.
Click to expand...
The husband can pick from three pre-approved choices. 😉
 
Lea101 said:
Did anyone else acknowledge you? I didn’t start the post so obviously I didn’t revisit it often to read all the posts. Also I wonder what kind of response you wanted. Even now after reading it I have nothing to say. It seems like it works for you and your wife, so that’s good.
Click to expand...
Oops. Sorry @Lea101 I missed this more conciliatory post before responding to another. A tradesman came to the door, and perhaps that’s how I missed it.

If I’d seen this I wouldn’t have responded as I did to others.

I’ll delete them. 🙂

Still, in future please don’t say that people have never given you examples of how submission would apply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top