H
hydin
Guest
detraction does not fit adultery, the violation of a public vow… Preventing harm - children, spouse… the cheating spouse… who is in mortal sin and more than likely headed to hell (can’t be forgive if you are happy you did it or continue to do it… does not grant forgiveness no matter what words the Priest speaks… God forgives through the priest and can’t forgive if their is not repentance… . If their is a mortal sin that is not forgiven due to not being repented or not mentioned then NO SINS are forgiven since the confession is purposely defective. The priest can’t see the heart, God can. He holds you responsible for your actions, which in this case is lying in confession by not being sorry or by omission.
The reputation has to be damaged… If one earned the reputation and it is known publicly… Sleeping on couch for two years, not acting as couple, seeing adultery partner in public setting and the other details of this situation and post show that the reputation of faithful wife does not exist… so can’t be injured. for more detailed examples from the ccc see below.
"The essence of detraction is the unwarranted disclosure of a hidden failing, which implies that there are occasions when the disclosure can and even should be made.
When the revelation of another person’s fault is necessary or very useful, as in defense of self or of others, no injustice is done in revealing it. This would be the case when the failing or defect is made known to parents, or superiors, or for the purpose of seeking counsel or help, or to prevent harm to others, though again, there must be adequate proportion between the lessening of a person’s reputation (which is not intended) and the good to be achieved by the disclosure (which is intended). This would cover such contingencies as anticipating unjust harm to oneself in the law courts, or even seeking consolation of a trusted friend by revealing the injustice done.
It is also not detraction to make known what has become juridically notorious, since the culprit has lost his right to esteem in the matter. " Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J.,
This case would fit Fraternal correction from the CCC
Correction, FRATERNAL, is here taken to mean the admonishing of one’s neighbor by a private individual with the purpose of reforming him or, if possible, preventing his sinful indulgence. This is clearly distinguishable from an official disciplining, whose mouth-piece is a judge or other like superior, whose object is the punishment of one found to be guilty, and whose motive is not so directly the individual advantage of the offender as the furtherance of the common good. That there is, upon occasion and with due regard to circumstances, an obligation to administer fraternal correction there can be no doubt. This is a conclusion not only deducible from the natural law binding us to love and to assist one another, but also explicitly contained in positive precept such as the inculcation of Christ: “If thy brother shall offend against thee, go, and rebuke him between thee and him alone. If he shall hear thee, thou shalt gain thy brother” (Matt., xviii, 15). Given a sufficiently grave condition of spiritual distress calling for succour in this way, this commandment may exact fulfilment under pain of mortal sin. This is reckoned to be so only when (I) the delinquency to be corrected or prevented is a grievous one;
continued
The reputation has to be damaged… If one earned the reputation and it is known publicly… Sleeping on couch for two years, not acting as couple, seeing adultery partner in public setting and the other details of this situation and post show that the reputation of faithful wife does not exist… so can’t be injured. for more detailed examples from the ccc see below.
"The essence of detraction is the unwarranted disclosure of a hidden failing, which implies that there are occasions when the disclosure can and even should be made.
When the revelation of another person’s fault is necessary or very useful, as in defense of self or of others, no injustice is done in revealing it. This would be the case when the failing or defect is made known to parents, or superiors, or for the purpose of seeking counsel or help, or to prevent harm to others, though again, there must be adequate proportion between the lessening of a person’s reputation (which is not intended) and the good to be achieved by the disclosure (which is intended). This would cover such contingencies as anticipating unjust harm to oneself in the law courts, or even seeking consolation of a trusted friend by revealing the injustice done.
It is also not detraction to make known what has become juridically notorious, since the culprit has lost his right to esteem in the matter. " Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J.,
This case would fit Fraternal correction from the CCC
Correction, FRATERNAL, is here taken to mean the admonishing of one’s neighbor by a private individual with the purpose of reforming him or, if possible, preventing his sinful indulgence. This is clearly distinguishable from an official disciplining, whose mouth-piece is a judge or other like superior, whose object is the punishment of one found to be guilty, and whose motive is not so directly the individual advantage of the offender as the furtherance of the common good. That there is, upon occasion and with due regard to circumstances, an obligation to administer fraternal correction there can be no doubt. This is a conclusion not only deducible from the natural law binding us to love and to assist one another, but also explicitly contained in positive precept such as the inculcation of Christ: “If thy brother shall offend against thee, go, and rebuke him between thee and him alone. If he shall hear thee, thou shalt gain thy brother” (Matt., xviii, 15). Given a sufficiently grave condition of spiritual distress calling for succour in this way, this commandment may exact fulfilment under pain of mortal sin. This is reckoned to be so only when (I) the delinquency to be corrected or prevented is a grievous one;
continued
