Stormy Daniels spills all about her alleged affair with Donald Trump on '60 Minutes'

  • Thread starter Thread starter exnihilo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not arguing about anything. I’m wondering why the mainstream media would have an interview with this person. This seems like National Enquirer material because it is.

Obviously the mainstream media is intent on disparaging Trump’s reputation. That wouldn’t be so bad if they did it equally. They should have interviewed the man who said he had homosexual sex with Obama if they wanted to at least appear fair.
Mainstream media did a similar expose back in Clintons day with Monica Lewinski. ABC’s 20/20 interview.
 
I don’t know why this is such a big deal…just like we gave Clinton a free pass with Monica, we should give Trump a free pass with Stormy!

As long as the economy is cooking, America doesn’t care if the President is a hound dog with no moral compass…heck, he even told us, “I could shot someone on 5th Avenue and my ratings would not go down!”

God Bless Donald Trump, the moral beacon of our nation!

…he said with a tinge of sarcasm…okay more than a tinge! 😮
 
Last edited:
The porn industry. Can a good Christian have anything to do with a porn film? I don’t see how we can answer yes.
I don’t think Trump should have been in such a production. But I don’t hold him up as a good example of living a Christian life.
That’s incredibly uncharitable. And under CAF Rules, flaggable .
She is a porn producer and stripper. That word describes her and isn’t a vulgar term. What she does to be so named is what is offensive offensive.
 
But that was the woman Clinton had perform sex acts on him in the Oval Office while he was president. That wasn’t one of his sexual encounters a decade prior to being elected. Also Clinton had lied under oath about these encounters. This was relevant to his acts as president.
 
Last edited:
That wasn’t one of his sexual encounters a decade prior to being elected. Also Clinton had lied under oath about these encounters. This was relevant to his acts as president.
Trump either laundering campaign funds or accepting illegal campaign contributions (or both!) to pay hush money to his mistress a week before the election is very relevant to his presidency.
 
Last edited:
Well, you all know I’m not a Trump supporter, but this really doesn’t mean anything other than a potential campaign law violation.

Trump supporters knew or should have known this about him. It isn’t newly revealed information. He’s always been an adulterer. He talked trash to Howard Stern for years.

The real question is why the people who voted for him thought that his moral character didn’t matter.
 
The real question is why the people who voted for him thought that his moral character didn’t matter.
I think moral character matters. I think moral character is rare if not non existent in presidential contenders.

Personally the main attraction for him as a candidate for me was that he actually has personal business interests. Unlike most politicians and corporate executives he doesn’t have much incentive to make things look good in the short term at the expense of the long term while personally enriching himself. His personal interest is more aligned with the long term success of the US. So he doesn’t need to sell favors to foreign governments through a sham charity or things like that to make money.
 
True, almost all journalism is tabloid journalism now. This interview tells us nothing reliable about Trump or Daniels. It tells us something reliably true about 60 Minutes, and CBS. Their credibilty is now reliably gone.
 
Last edited:
The real question is why the people who voted for him thought that his moral character didn’t matter.
Who could they vote for?
Hillary Clinton, Jill Stein and Gary Johnson? The first is one who can never accept responsibility for her own failures and whines about it (much like DJT) and openly hostile to Christians. The second is openly hostile to Christians and a bit crazy. The third is just crazy.
And the US electoral system makes the concept of wasted votes a reality. A good system that could mitigate wasted votes could be that of Australia’s House of Commons or in that system, at least demonstrate the winner only won with those not enthusiastic about the winner.
 
Last edited:
Road-Worrier said that he didn’t think Trump was a good Christian. I don’t see any evidence that would cause me to disagree with him. Do you have evidence to the contrary? By all means, I am willing to hear an argument that he is a fine upstanding Christian man.
Would you bet your soul on declaring anyone a “fine upstanding Christian man” if you really had to go to hell if you were wrong?
 
The real question is why the people who voted for him thought that his moral character didn’t matter.
Not saying it does not matter at all, but tell us how you feel his moral character has adversely affected his performance in practical terms as president so far.

As I have said before, he was not elected to be an archbishop, but a secular leader.
 
She is suing Trump’s lawyer for defamation. “Mr. Cohen’s statement exposed Ms. Clifford to hatred, contempt, ridicule, and shame, and discouraged others from associating or dealing with her,” says her lawyer Mr. Avenatti.
 
I don’t care that FDR’s wife may have been a lesbian. I don’t care that JFK was likely a serial philanderer, even while in the White House. I don’t care that LBJ would call people into his office while he was taking a dump. I don’t care that Bill Clinton was also a serial philanderer, even in the White House. And I don’t care that Trump was a serial philanderer before he came into the White House.

I have made lots of mistakes myself, and like my mistakes, those things are between those men and God.

I do care that Clinton used his position as PRESIDENT to have sex with an intern in the White House. That is using the position that I voted him INTO to get fellatio.

If Trump had sex with a porn star…I don’t care.

Just remember, the left wing media didn’t care about Clinton’s little transgressions in 1998. After all, “publicly humiliating anyone for consensual adultery is draconian, and wrong. It teaches children cynicism. What they see is how little respect there is for privacy, and how gratuitously and harshly adults will harm one another to gain a little power. And using adultery or any aspect of consensual adult sexuality as a weapon in political battles is more abhorrent than the act itself.”

Right??

Quote from https://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/19/opinion/the-adultery-wars.html
 
Just remember, the left wing media didn’t care about Clinton’s little transgressions in 1998.
Well that is an opinion piece, and Ms Smith is entitled to her opinion. Biut it isntersting that you claim this to be about Clinton, when it was about Bob Livingston, Henry Hyde, Dan Burton, and Helen Chenoweth.
Republicans all. Did you miss that?
 
Would you bet your soul on declaring anyone a “fine upstanding Christian man” if you really had to go to hell if you were wrong?
Who is betting their soul? Can we say that Donald is an orthodox Christian just from observable facts? For example, he unapologetically engaged in adultery. There is nothing in his many statements on his affairs that suggests he was in anyway repentant. His marriage situation is irregular by any orthodox christian standard. He has said he has no need to ask for forgiveness. Are these virtuous characteristics?
 
Not saying it does not matter at all, but tell us how you feel his moral character has adversely affected his performance in practical terms as president so far.
Someone who commits adultery has problems honoring commitments. Which probably explains why Mexico is not paying for the wall. Someone who commits adultery also has a problem with self control, which explains why he ballooned the budget deficit by cutting taxes and increasing spending.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top