Story: "Trans teen regrets his ‘Frankenstein’ transition."

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
OraLabora:
The reality is that they are transgendered and are severely distressed by the gender assigned at birth.
Assigned at birth?
Really?
Genders do get assigned at birth. People with AIS are usually assigned a female gender at birth and this is put on their birth certificates because they physically look female even though they are genetically male with XY sex chromosomes.
 
Last edited:
And if you read what OraLabora has said about his daughter, it’s obvious that coming out as a transgender person helped her quite a lot.
My understanding was a repair to parts that were malformed.
This is not the same as attempted sex change.
 
My understanding was a repair to parts that were malformed.
No that is incorrect. She was physically normal at birth.
No they don’t.
The doctors have no control of that.
Well, they do. As Thorolfr noted, AIS “boys” get assigned as girls at birth. Even though they are genetically boys, their body phenotype is normal female. They usually don’t get diagnosed until they fail to menstruate. By that time they have lived (usually happily) as girls for about 12-14 years, so doctors won’t “undo” the birth assignment. Sometimes in the cases of ambiguous genitalia, a “call” was made at birth that turned out to be wrong. Nowadays with the intersexed, I believe the protocol is to avoid assigning gender at birth and seeing how things play out, i.e. letting the patient steer towards the gender they identify with.

There was the famous case of a Canadian child who lost his penis as a child through a botched circumcision. The parents were advised to have corrective surgery and raise him as a girl. It turned out to be a big fail. Eventually he reverted to being a man in young adulthood, but eventually committed suicide. That famous case was a datum that gender is determined by what’s in the brain, not by what’s between the legs.

As I get older I begin to realize how the world is shaded in nuances of grey. Trying to make everything black and white usually ends up with heartache at best, blatant discrimination at worst. Hence the reason the LGBQT movement exists in the first place.
 
Last edited:
I’m sorry but I’m not going to get into intimate details about my child.
 
Sometimes in the cases of ambiguous genitalia, a “call” was made at birth that turned out to be wrong.
Wait a second…I have been told me gender was assigned at birth.
Now your saying that it is simply a call.

Which is it?
I would think in a thread with this subject, that would be an important distinction.
 
Wait a second…I have been told me gender was assigned at birth.
Now your saying that it is simply a call.
In cases of ambiguous genitalia, a call was made at birth, a best guess; note the use of the past tense here. But that is no longer the case. The patient gets to determine the gender they feel most comfortable with.

In other cases where the phenotype is normal for one or the other gender, that is the gender assigned. In a very small number of cases, the transgendered, the assignment does not correspond to the experienced gender of the person.
 
Last edited:
Sure. Nobody would think twice about removing a cancerous penis or testicles (it happens all the time) to save the patient’s life; or to castrate a man with advanced prostate cancer which won’t save his life, but may prolong it somewhat.

If a patient is suicidal because of his or her genitals, do we say “too bad, so sad, here’s a good length of rope, see you in eternity”? Or do we offer the best, albeit far from perfect, treatment that we have while continuing research to find something better?
By your logic, if a mother had suicidal thoughts about a child in her womb, she should be encouraged to have an abortion.
Not really. Abortion is a greater evil than removing an organ. Apples and oranges.

“removing a cancerous penis or testicles” vs “suicidal because of his or her genitals” - This is apples and oranges!

Hence my response to your comment “By your logic, if a mother had suicidal thoughts about a child in her womb, she should be encouraged to have an abortion.” still holds.
 
Hence my response to your comment “By your logic, if a mother had suicidal thoughts about a child in her womb, she should be encouraged to have an abortion.” still holds.
Ending a life is in no way comparable to removing an organ. I’m sorry but I’m not playing the “everything revolves around abortion” game that is so popular on CAF. This is a completely separate topic to be determined on its own criteria. Comparing everything to abortion is the CAF equivalent of Godwin’s law.

I’ve said my piece, and made my peace with the issue. Over and out.
 
In cases of ambiguous genitalia, a call was made at birth, a best guess; note the use of the past tense here.
This is not what I have been told.
I was told very clearly:
Genders do get assigned at birth.
And I even clarified with the statement that it was outside of the doctors ability to assign such at birth.

Now your saying something else entirely.

In a thread such as this, accuracy in the language used should be a goal so we can avoid confusion.
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
Genders do get assigned at birth.
No they don’t.
The doctors have no control of that.
Of course the doctors have control of that. When I spoke of genders being assigned at birth, I mean that someone, usually a doctor, assigns a gender to a newborn baby that will appear for legal purposes on a birth certificate. He puts down on the paperwork that is filed with the state that the baby he just delivered is either male or female. In most places in the US, it’s still necessary to go to court to get that assigned gender changed. The gender of a newborn baby is usually obvious to a doctor and if the baby looks like a girl, he will put on the paperwork that the child is female. But sometimes, some children such as those with AIS that look like they are female are actually genetically male. So, in the case of someone with AIS, it’s somewhat uncertain as to whether an assigned gender at birth of “female” is correct or not.
 
Last edited:
When I spoke of genders being assigned at birth, I mean that someone, usually a doctor, assigns a gender to a newborn baby that will appear for legal purposes on a birth certificate.
They are simply reporting what is apparent, or in some cases not so apparent, for the purposes of documentation.

This isn’t exactly assigning. Sex organs develop long before then. Chromosomes dictate long before that.
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
When I spoke of genders being assigned at birth, I mean that someone, usually a doctor, assigns a gender to a newborn baby that will appear for legal purposes on a birth certificate.
They are simply reporting what is apparent, or in some cases not so apparent, for the purposes of documentation.

This isn’t exactly assigning. Sex organs develop long before then. Chromosomes dictate long before that.
All I know is that when people talk of a gender being “assigned at birth,” they usually mean what the doctor put on the legal paperwork when a child was born. You can quibble over whether that is a correct use of the word “assign,” but that’s what most people mean.
 
Last edited:
You can quibble over whether that is a correct use of the word “assign,” but that’s what most people mean.
This thread involves people trying to change gender. Under normal circumstances I would readily açcept what you were saying.

Given the subject matter, clarification was in order.
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
You can quibble over whether that is a correct use of the word “assign,” but that’s what most people mean.
This thread involves people trying to change gender. Under normal circumstances I would readily açcept what you were saying.

Given the subject matter, clarification was in order.
Most transgender people I know don’t believe that they’ve literally changed from one sex to another one. They’re thinking of gender identity, not biological or chromosomal sex, and their gender identity is not being changed. For many of them, their gender identity has always been different from and not aligned with their chromosomal sex. Someone’s gender identity has to do with their internal sense of what gender they belong to, not to whether their chromosomes are XX or XY. Scientists already know that although a person’s gender identify and chromosomal sex usually coincide, they can sometimes diverge, perhaps because the brain develops later in pregnancy and under different influences than the processes that determine outward physical sexual characteristics.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Thorolfr:
Most transgender people I know don’t believe that they’ve literally changed from one sex to another one.
That would indicate some psychological problems.
Far from it. They’re perfectly aware that how they feel inside diverges from their outward physical characteristics. And that divergence is not necessarily just a “psychological problem.” Over the last few decades, there has been a convergence of neurology and psychology and most psychologists now realize that many psychological disorders are brain disorders and arise from physical glitches in people’s brains.
 
They’re perfectly aware that how they feel inside diverges from their outward physical characteristics. And that divergence is not necessarily just a “psychological problem.”
Failure to see reality can be a problem.
Refusal to accept reality indicates mental issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top