Stunning rebuke of Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peebo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
7_Sorrows said:
Do you really need to ask?
Click to expand...
Yes. For example, the republicans refused to consider Merrick Garland, that was certainly a noncooperative political move. What have the democrats done that is as significant as that?
 
on the other hand,

https://www.westernjournal.com/hillary-caught-report-emails/?

Judicial Watch has released two batches of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that she sent and received using her unsecured, non-“state.gov” email.

The two documents from the U.S. Department of State — at 184 pages and 45 pagesrespectively — were obtained by Judicial Watch as the result of a lawsuit filed in 2015.

The purpose of the lawsuit was to seek “All emails sent or received by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in her official capacity as Secretary of State, as well as all emails by other State Department employees to Secretary Clinton regarding her non-“state.gov” email address.”
 
Last edited:
Oh please. Why don’t you watch the new
Dinesh D’Souza movie Death of a Nation?
I saw it today. Very good.
I am sure you watch the news so you know exactly what has been going on foe
2 years. Isn’t that why you call yourself
stinkcat?
 
7_Sorrows said:
Oh please. Why don’t you watch the new
Dinesh D’Souza movie Death of a Nation?
I saw it today. Very good.
I am sure you watch the news so you know exactly what has been going on foe
2 years. Isn’t that why you call yourself
stinkcat?
Click to expand...
In other words, you are convinced that the democrats are acting in some sort of evil way, but you cannot articulate even on immoral thing that they have done. If you can’t articulate why the democrats are evil, why should anyone believe you?
 
7_Sorrows said:
Maybe when they accept the Trump presidency and stop harrassing Trump, we won’t have to bring up Hillary.
Click to expand...
One can accept that Donald Trump was elected president and still be unhappy about it.

And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with it.
 
Why do I need to articulate it. We all have lived through it for 2 years. You would have to be living under a rock or on another planet. I Don’t have time to play games about articulating.
 
She had everything to do with Donald being president…and her husband Bill.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Why do I need to articulate it. We all have lived through it for 2 years. You would have to be living under a rock or on another planet. I Don’t have time to play games about articulating.
Click to expand...
I am trying to see where the dividing line is between opposition which you think is reasonable and the supposed evil of the democrats. For example, I am sure you would be fine if the democrats controlled the senate and they refused to consider any Trump supreme court nominees until after the next election. I am sure that you would agree that is perfectly legitimate opposition. So what is the evil opposition that you are alluding to? You cannot even give one example.
 
7_Sorrows said:
We only had one other person to vote for.
Click to expand...
Well, no. You had John Kasich, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Carly Fiorina, Rick Santorum, Rand Paul and a bunch of other also-rans.

You chose Trump.

I sort of understand why, and that scares me.
 
Trump has been the most pro-life president, at least in modern time, so say Dr. King’s niece Alvita and Father Pavone. We no longer see ISIS rampaging across the Middle East and terrorism being beaten back, we have brought North Korea to the negotiatiig table per nuclear weapons and they have not fired missiles off in months and months. Minority unemployment is at all-time lows. Sure, I will take all of this versus spurious accusations that have little to do with running the country.
 
You look like your the only one hear beating this anti-Trump drum and attacking him. So, that tells me something. You are also close to a personal attack about what scares you. Sorry, I’m not voting against the right to life. I will crawl over broken glass to vote pro-life.
 
Last edited:
Victoria33 said:
You look like your the only one hear beating this anti-Trump drum and attacking him. So, that tells me something. You are also close to a personal attack about what scares you. Sorry, I’m not voting against the right to life. I will crawl over broken glass to vote pro-life.
Click to expand...
What do you think I’m afraid of? And who do you think I’m attacking, or am close to attacking, personally?
 
Victoria33 said:
Looks like that is a derisive remark.
Click to expand...
Not at all. Far from it.

I’m beginning to understand, mostly because of what I’ve learned here at CAF, why Republican voters chose Trump.

I’m not happy about it. That’s hardly a secret. I don’t like the direction in which he’s taking our nation, and I’m concerned that a large number of people are happy about it, and actually cheer him on.

How is that derisive? It’s not derisive to disagree with someone (any more that it’s un-patriotic to oppose Trump, as much as some here like to insinuate, or outright state, that it is).

This hardly amounts to a personal attack. Disagreement is not an attack.
 
Last edited:
7_Sorrows said:
I wasn’t talking about the primaries.
Click to expand...
I know, but Republicans chose Trump in the primaries over all of those candidates. Most of whom had much better pro-life credentials than Trump.

I think there’s more to it than that.
 
Inisfallen said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
I wasn’t talking about the primaries.
Click to expand...
I know, but Republicans chose Trump in the primaries over all of those candidates. Most of whom had much better pro-life credentials than Trump.

I think there’s more to it than that.
Click to expand...
Yes, there is more to it than that - Hillary!

Which candidate had the best chance of beating Hillary.

I think we have all had this conversation before!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top