P
Palladio
Guest
Sorry, I don’t follow.Tell that to the man who wrote the book “Goodbye Good Men”.
Sorry, I don’t follow.Tell that to the man who wrote the book “Goodbye Good Men”.
The book “Goodbye Good men” explains how the gay culture made it’s way into the seminaries.Sorry, I don’t follow.
But I understand that, as my first post suggests.The book “Goodbye Good men” explains how the gay culture made it’s way into the seminaries.
How else to do you explain the Vatican’s recent statement on gay men and the priesthood?
John Paul II made numerous reforms in the priesthood. Cardinal Ratzinger played a pivotal role in it.It is not a different era for those victimized.
By any standard of justice and morality, the RCC had better well take a hard look at it priesthood–and I know the figures for abuse are no different from those in the general population–who must be Christlike from ordination to the grave.
A cradle Catholic serving Mass at three parishes and attending three RC schools and close to priests, I never suffered the least harm in any regard–for the vast majority, this is so–but equally I consider myself superabundantly blessed to have looked and to look still upon our priests as Godly, as having always led me on the way, the truth, and the life that is Christ.
But the priests I know are getting on, and the younger ones must endure some battles that would be completely non-existant without the widespread homosexuality of the seminaries and priesthood.
Pray that the Church finds ways fast to undo the conditions that thwart or stop the vocations of the best and brightest, and you will have said a very good prayer indeed.
Actually what I said was that paedophillia and homosexuallity are not linked and that a paedophille can be hetrosexual or homosexual.Either way its paedophillia.The fact they’re both males makes it a homosexual relationship.
Many gays were in the seminary and scared off the orthodox seminaries.Actually what I said was that paedophillia and homosexuallity are not linked and that a paedophille can be hetrosexual or homosexual.Either way its paedophillia.
But lets say that you are right, it doesnt explain how this is the fault of the gay community.
Priests take a vow of celebacy and molesting children is legally and morally wrong.
It appears that the priests chose to break not only their vows, but also the law and societies morals. Not only that, but representativies of the church chose to hide/cover up these crimes. Where exactly does the homosexual community take part in this?
You are right, things were different back then. It still doesnt excuse what happened or the actions taken by the churches representativies.It’s interesting to see people try to dissect a problem that began in quite a different era from the one we presently live in.
Decades ago, most pedophilia was covered up regardless of who was involved. Children were often silenced or accused of being immodest if they even mentioned sexual advances…Pregnancies were covered up and babies were secretly put up for adoption…It was a different time, people.
As times changed, these things came out and hopefully with more awareness history will not repeat itself. However, I don’t think it does any good to sit and measure yesterday’s actions by today’s standards (not referring to legal standards here).
If anything, what the scandal has taught us is that while the Catholic Church is the true church, it is made up of fallible human beings. This prevents us from being complacent or holier-than-thou.
To drag around the twin burdens of guilt and shame or try to assuage it by blaming experts/church authorities/homosexual culture/whatever is to not learn the lesson of this experience.
It happened. We’re truly sorry. We make amends any way we can and move on. We can only change tomorrow, not yesterday.
That doesnt answer my question.Many gays were in the seminary and scared off the orthodox seminaries.
If there is no link, why are the vast majority of victims boys? Why were these pedophiles more attracted to little boys than little girls? If it was mere coincidence, then there should have been about as many girls abused as boys, but that’s not the case. Boys were specifically targeted by these adult men That’s a homosexual attraction.Actually what I said was that paedophillia and homosexuallity are not linked and that a paedophille can be hetrosexual or homosexual.Either way its paedophillia.
And our Holy Father clearly has further to go in the U. S.John Paul II made numerous reforms in the priesthood. Cardinal Ratzinger played a pivotal role in it.
I’ve often thought this may be the case, but I have no fact to back it up. Though one could not argue that priesthood would be a convenient excuse for not being married. Lord knows I’ve encountered my share of femmy priests over the years.Men continue actively to enter the priesthood as refuge for their practice of homosexuality.
I have direct witness testimony of it!I’ve often thought this may be the case, but I have no fact to back it up. Though one could not argue that priesthood would be a convenient excuse for not being married. Lord knows I’ve encountered my share of femmy priests over the years.
Nohome
The healing, redemptive power of God’s love…You are right, things were different back then. It still doesnt excuse what happened or the actions taken by the churches representativies.
The church has always meant to be the spiritual and moral compass of society, they always teach us to do the right thing and to be good. Yet they chose to ignore their own teachings and possibly do the “safe” thing rather than the right thing.
The victims involved will never be able to move on, they have had their lives forcefully taken away from them.
It is very clear who is to blame, by their actoins or inaction, regardless of the perpertraitors sexual orientation or what councillers advised. Horrible crimes were commited and those in the know didnt act or covered them up and protected the wrong people.
What lessons do you think that the victims have taken from this?
I got news for you, the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter is growing. And so is Christ the King Institute! And they are orthodox! We are seeing a renewal in the priesthood.I’ve often thought this may be the case, but I have no fact to back it up. Though one could not argue that priesthood would be a convenient excuse for not being married. Lord knows I’ve encountered my share of femmy priests over the years.
Nohome
I think you’re ignoring the obvious. These sites point out the direct connection between homosexuality and pedophiliaActually what I said was that paedophillia and homosexuallity are not linked and that a paedophille can be hetrosexual or homosexual.Either way its paedophillia.
But lets say that you are right, it doesnt explain how this is the fault of the gay community.
Priests take a vow of celebacy and molesting children is legally and morally wrong.
It appears that the priests chose to break not only their vows, but also the law and societies morals. Not only that, but representativies of the church chose to hide/cover up these crimes. Where exactly does the homosexual community take part in this?
Where is this gay community anyway? Besides the gay culture (oxymoronic term, I know) freely and openly supported by NBC and the media, where is it?Actually what I said was that paedophillia and homosexuallity are not linked and that a paedophille can be hetrosexual or homosexual.Either way its paedophillia.
But lets say that you are right, it doesnt explain how this is the fault of the gay community.
Priests take a vow of celebacy and molesting children is legally and morally wrong.
It appears that the priests chose to break not only their vows, but also the law and societies morals. Not only that, but representativies of the church chose to hide/cover up these crimes. Where exactly does the homosexual community take part in this?
I firmly believe that the best time to get help for the child is when the situation is discovered.:twocents: Someone to help the child at the time and to make sure the child recovers from the situation is what was needed.My point is that they should have done something at the time these incidents happened.
The bishops and priests (our spiritual and moral leaders/teachers) involved got to live their lives freely for all these years, but they forced their victims into emotional/spiritual/social imprisonment for the rest of their lives. How many of those victims that we have not heard from have taken their own lives because of what happened to them (believe me, it does happen)?
If this bankrupts the church as a whole, then so be it. It is nothing less than it deserves because of the inaction/deception of the church since this began. I don’t believe that financial compensation is enough (I know that it wont magically heal the victims either or give them their lives back), but unfortunately that is pretty much the only option available to the victims and one of the few options to punish the church.
I don’t think that I really replied to you post, and I think that I may have misunderstood what you wrote. I’m sorry about that and I’m sorry for exposing you to my heated rant.

I do not think they knew that the offender could not be CURED till sometime around the mid-1980s. This is when these things were followed in the news and in federal data banks. Till then there was no shared information center for sex offenders. And there are still many that believe that they can be cured even now.No apology necessary as you are not culpable in the matter.
Why qualify this defense with dates? Did the Bishops not know that it was a crime to rape children before 1980? I believe they listened to these fools because they wanted to believe there was a neat, quiet way out of this mess. What arrogance to think that because they worked for “a higher authority” that they were not subject to civil law.
Nohome