G
gracepoole
Guest
Agreed.I like that Marshall said “I’m not making any accusations” and that he would just like Vatican to look into it. I thought that was a pretty measured response.
People keep using the word “hacked” to describe what’s happened. But that isn’t really accurate since Wikipedia is an open platform that invites edits. Maybe vandalism is indeed a better characterization.I don’t doubt that Marshall’s wiki was vandalized.
This is my question, as well. People misuse servers all the time.I still want to know how we can be sure the IP really came from the Vatican at all, let alone the Secretariat of State. I assume that is going to take something more thorough than Twitter-sleuthing. Something along the lines of what Dr. Marshall is requesting of the Vatican which I highly doubt will be honored, not because the Holy See is complicit in this but because in the grand scheme of things for a sovereign state a Wikipedia edit war is really not worth the trouble.
Yes, but fishy in the same way that it was fishy that Marshall’s entire history of tweets was erased at the same time that idols were “disposed of” in Rome. I’m not sure such coincidences are truly meaningful.It looks like same Vatican IP address was taken offline today at exact time that Marshall edits were reported. See Marshall’s twitter feed where he links to the various Vatican IT pages showing “offline”. Again, not conclusive but definitely fishy.