Testimony: Trump dossier not made-up; not politically motivated

  • Thread starter Thread starter HCTC
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As for the Dossier, remember the Fact Finding Mission was originally funded by some unknown Rep and the Dems picked it up after it turned out Trumpnochhio became the nominee. The Rep set things in motion. Dems just assumed the Mortgage payment on the service that was started.
 
I think this is the best way to look at it. That’s why I don’t put much stock in such politi-trackers and charts. A lot depends on how they are categorizing things as being truth or lie.

Not that I think Trump is particularly virtuous and I certainly don’t approve of lying. I’m not entirely certain that’s what he means to do in many cases, even when he’s caught saying something that is verifiably false. I’m inclined to think that Trump is just so used to speaking with grandiose hyperbole because he’s a business man who is used to selling things. Everything is either the best thing ever or the worst thing ever. It’s not necessarily a good quality for a president to speak that way, but I don’t know that it signifies he is mentally unbalanced.
 
This exchange made me think about it. I think I know what happened. A few years ago, the IRS wouldn’t even accept my taxes for more than a year. Kept telling me I’d paid. I hadn’t. Turns out someone was using my SS#, name, etc. They might have influenced my health insurance. I’ll call the insurance company. Maybe THEY qualified for subsidies. I know I don’t. That was the second time I’ve experienced identity theft. Sick of it.
First time I’ve heard of ID theft being a benefit to the person 👍.
 
That is only Temporary. Roy Moore’s past caught up with him. Doug Jones is only in Office for 3 years. This is a Red State 60/40 Rep/Dem. But again, a lot can change in 3 years. Attitudes for one. The old farts that are Red are dying off being replaced by the younger ( more often than not Educated ) Blues. The Red Neck Reds might forget where the Polls are in the next election.
Yes, I can see you are right. Thanks!
 
There were so many reasons why the democrats needed Hillary to win. They needed
Is that why Trump’s are so exposed? No one is covering for him? Some major Rep. did not even attend the convention in Cleveland.
 
40.png
Imdaman:
I’m sorry but what did you expect them to say while trying to cover their behinds. You believe these guys but so what. It is really easy to say things one does not mean.

Common sense tells us things to the contrary of what GPD fusion has to say.
I suggest that you read the transcript.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4345522/Read-the-full-transcript-of-Glenn-Simpson-s.pdf
OK, done, Now please show me where it gives us any proof that what he says is true… Or should we just take his word for it!
 
What in this article do you think contradicts Simpson’s testimony? I have only skimmed the transcript of the testimony so I don’t know all the claims Simpson makes.
 
OK, done, Now please show me where it gives us any proof that what he says is true… Or should we just take his word for it!
You’re a very fast reader; your post followed mine by four minutes. Since you are the one casting doubt on the testimony, maybe you can be more specific?
 
Aint no way you read it that fast. I started as soon as it was posted and I am only on page 66 and got like 250 more to go. B.S.
 
I just got to part where the investigation was requested in Sep/Oct 2015.
 
Haven’t you already posted the same transcript in other recent posts?
 
So the first time I saw this is when you posted it… is that right?

Now out of the 66 pages please give me an example of Trump dossier not being made up or politically motivated.

I see alot of "generalities and I don’t knows but nothing specific!
 
http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/10/10-takeaways-from-glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-senate-testimony/

Two HUGE bombshell allegations from Simpson in his testimony that we now know were false.

Fusion GPS: The FBI had an informant in Trump tower.
Ken Dilanian: There was no FBI informant walk-in source, that was a mischaracterization by Simpson.
Rather than inform Congress of the false information, Fusion GPS leaked it to Ken Dilanian at NBC.

Fusion to Congress: One of the dossier sources was murdered, you know.
Fusion to CNN: Actually, we just meant that people in Russia have died since then.

Simpson’s testimony hardly supports the Trump/Russia conspiracy theories, more than anything it raises serious questions about the FBI’s behavior.
 
Last edited:
From what I am hearing, those who are dancing with glee about this testimony, might want to refrain a little. In the next week or two, a big breaking story is due to come
out.
 
From what I am hearing, those who are dancing with glee about this testimony, might want to refrain a little. In the next week or two, a big breaking story is due to come out.
Do you have a source for that, or do you expect us to just take your word for this? No disrespect meant, but it sounds like something Trump would say, and we know we can’t take his word. If it’s “breaking” how would you know about it ahead of ANY news outlet?
 
Last edited:
Pg. 52
BY MS. SAWYER:
23 Q. Mr. Simpson, again, I’m Heather Sawyer, I
24 work as counsel for Senator Feinstein, and I have
25 with me two of my colleagues. I will primarily be

Pg. 53
  1. asking the questions. They may have some
    2 follow-up.
    3 We want to make sure we’re clear. So
    4 certainly if I ask you a question, anything that’s
    5 unclear, let me know and I will clarify it. Again,
    6 we appreciate you being here today to answer our
    7 questions.
    8 You had talked with my colleagues a bit about
    9 the work that Fusion GPS does in general and I
    10 wanted to ask you some follow-up on that. What
    11 would you describe as kind of the key expertise of
    12 your firm, Fusion GPS?
    13 A. Public information is our specialty. We
    14 generally are all ex-journalists and specific type
    15 of journalists, investigative reporters, and, you
    16 know, being a journalist is all about finding
    17 public information. At least, you know, the kind
    18 of journalism I practiced was based on documents.
    19 I’m a document hound and so are my colleagues.
    20 So essentially we gather up large quantities
    21 of public information and we process that. We’ve
    22 sort of more recently branched into data science
    23 and, you know, digital data, obtaining databases
    24 through FOIA. We do a lot of Freedom of
    25 Information Act work. We work with court records
Pg. 54
1 a lot, corporate records a lot. Some of my
2 employees do a lot of financial crime and money
3 laundering and fraud investigations, tax evasion,
4 that sort of thing. Those are my specialties.
5 I was also a political reporter and covered
6 campaigns and elections. I know a lot about how
7 campaigns work and how, you know, Washington works
8 generally. So we do things like policy disputes,
9 one industry versus another, one company versus
10 another. We don’t do a lot of campaign consulting,
11 but every four years for the last couple of cycles
12 we’ve done some presidential work.
13 Generally speaking, the way our business is
14 structured most campaigns don’t have the budget for
15 the kind of services that we provide. So we only
16 would do things where people have the resources to
17 pay for a serious piece of research. So we do
18 things like a California initiative or
19 presidential.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top