C
CMatt25
Guest
Thanks Semper. I guess I was thinking had Pawlenty remained in, perhaps he by now would have been up in Iowa, and had he actually won the caucus, the race would have gone to NH and beyond between him and Romney. I always looked at Pawlenty as a possible candidate who might have been able to unite conservatives and moderates in the GOP rather early on if he had been able to take Iowa. But oh well, it should be an interesting few mos to see how it all shakes out for the field that much is sure.Well, first Cmatt I do appreciate you taking the high road. I would, in non-specific terms say that what has recently been posted amounts to little more than “wouldn’t you agree that I’m right and you’re wrong?”
Hmm, I have seen a few people say that Pawlenty would definitely have gotten some momentum, but then they discredit it and say he would never have gotten to first tier. But, idk, I was certainly open to Pawlenty myself. Chances are that if he were more inspiring than Mitt Romney, with this fickle of an electorate there may have been a contest among the moderate candidates as well as the conservatives.
It might’ve looked like a semi-finals line up
Pawlenty vs. Romney Cain vs. Perry vs. Gingrich vs. Bachmann
_________ moderate vs. _____________ conservative
As for Bachmann, all I have to say is that it is easy to in retrospect call her the “Romney-challenger”, and a lot of media frequently like to simplify the race so far by saying “it was Bachmann than Perry and now Cain”. All I have to say is that her numbers were never as high as Perry or Cain. So, while she mounted a challenge, many conservatives wouldn’t get on board even for a brief period (leaving her 10ish points below Romney). Having gone from 2nd behind Romney to polling 4% and 3%, she needs to drop out.