J
jwinch2
Guest
That’s kind of what I was looking for in his writings and as long as nothing else has crept in there, it is fine with me.He also wrote great guides on contemplative prayer.
Sounds like I will just stay away from those.That’s a second type of writing. He wrote on social situations and tried to apply the Church’s social teachings to these situations. These are not his best works. They’re very confusing. I believe that they are confusing because they’re coming from the mind of a contemplative who is looking at social issues vertically, from the top down. Those of us who do not have the gift or the vocation to the contemplative life, can’t see the world from that perspective.
His final form of writing was comparative spirituality.
Comparative spirituality does exactly what it says. It studies multiple forms of spirituality: Shinto, Buddhist, Hinduism, Islam, Jewish, Christian and other. It looks for common elements and the differences. This area of spirituality has helped shape the Church’s teaching on ecumenism. That’s why the radical traditionalist hates Merton, as if Merton were the only one to write on this. He was the most scholarly writer, but not the only writer on this.
What we have found through this area of theology is that God constantly tries to make himself felt among all men. That non-Catholics have not been abandoned. The evidence is in the fact that we find elements of our spirituality in other faiths and philosophies. Merton points to them.
Another important contribution of this branch of theology is that it has helped us discover methods of prayer that are useful to the Christian, especially the contemplative monk or nun. A method is not a doctrine. It’s a way of doing something, not a doctrinal statement about what you’re doing. For example, when Christian monks sit on the floor resting their bum on their ankles, that’s a eastern posture. But what they have found is that it is very natural, more so than sitting on a hard wooden bench in a choir. You can actually sit that way for a longer period of time without getting tired.
I know many Benedictines have been involved in ecumenical efforts, which I have no problem with. My only concern is that other things do not start creeping in which shouldn’t be. I don’t wish to put my spiritual life in a precarious position, particularly unknowingly.Finally, Comparative Spirituality points to differences in our spirituality. These differences are very important in order to open a dialogue with people of other faiths. One of the reasons that Christianity never took off in the Far East as it did in Europe is that the Asian cultures were very advanced civilizations. The Christians could not suppress them as they did to the Europeans and the European colonies. But they could not dialogue with them either, because they did not understand their worldview, much less their spirituality and all of its symbols and gestures. Today, we’re making more progress. One man who tried very hard to Christianize Buddhism rather than obliterate it was St. Maximilian Kolbe when he was the superior in Japan. He had learned this from a letter written by St. Francis Xavier who admitted that if he could only understand, he could make converts.
There was a group of Augustinians that no longer exists that lived according the Benedictine tradition. It was the first group that St. Augustine founded. They did not die out. They evolved into the Canons Regular of St. Augustine and a splinter group evolved into the Augustinian Friars, which are mendicant.
Given the age of the work, my guess is that Kempis may have belonged to this group of Augustinian monks. These monks were Augustinian, because they were founded by Augustine, but they followed the Benedictine way of life. This would make sense, because when Augustine finally writes his rule, it reads like a photocopy of Benedict’s rule. However, Augustine replaces Benedict’s vows with the Evangelical Counsels. But this is long after he had founded his monastic community.
Fraternally,
Thanks, I’ll probably check that book out.Br. JR, FFV![]()
Peace,