No, you are not. I have only read up to this point, but I have yet to hear you logically explain how the two statements you supposedly hear over and over are illogical. WHY are they illogical. Explain it to me logically. ‘You can’t take credit for the positive and pass the buck on the negative’ means absolutely nothing. You love logic so much, surely you can use it to explain your position. I program computers, I use logic every day. So I’ll try to get down to the bones of it.
You say that since
- The Catholic ‘Church’ claims to have given us the Bible
and
- The Catholic ‘Church’ has abused children,
Then one must logically assume that the Catholic ‘Church’ is just as culpable in the abuses as it is responsible for the Bible, correct?
Hmm, that is poor programming. If I were writing a program, I would first gather all the facts. Firstly, I would create a Truth Chart. For instance, I would ask myself, “Does ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ OR does ‘Church’ = 'collection of individuals”? Because, if ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ is true, then “‘Institution’ abused children” is true. That is ridiculous, since an ‘institution’ cannot do anything physically to anyone. So your logic fails. But if ‘Church’ = ‘collection of individuals’ is true, then “‘Church’ wrote Bible” must be true, by your logic. But, as you said, I didn’t write the Bible, and I consider ‘Me’ = ‘Catholic’ to be true. And since I’m Catholic, I must be a part of the ‘Church’. And since I’m part of the ‘Church’, I must have written the Bible. Which we all know is ridiculous. So the logic fails again.
Now, you seem to fancy yourself a logician. Let’s have the logic.