The Catholic church did not give us the Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotTooSmart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No all I am asking for is some consistency.

Either you have
(1) The Catholic church is responsible for the Bible
(2) The Catholic church is responsible for the priest sex abuse scandals

OR

(2) People in the Catholic church are responsible for the Bible
(2) People in the Catholic church are responsible for the priest sex abuse scandals

Now I think option (2) is the better one but your choice.

What you can not be though, is to have it both ways, to take credit for the positive and pass the buck on the negative.
I am so glad I’m not a Prot anymore. That idiotic, uneducated, downright FOOLISH attitude of “it’s either this er that!” annoys me sooo much. No, it’s not either this or that. In your feeble mind it might be, but that just goes to show how incredibly ignorant you are.
 
Why?

All I am doing is pointing out the inconsistencies between two parallel statements claimed over-and-over on these boards.
No, you are not. I have only read up to this point, but I have yet to hear you logically explain how the two statements you supposedly hear over and over are illogical. WHY are they illogical. Explain it to me logically. ‘You can’t take credit for the positive and pass the buck on the negative’ means absolutely nothing. You love logic so much, surely you can use it to explain your position. I program computers, I use logic every day. So I’ll try to get down to the bones of it.

You say that since
  1. The Catholic ‘Church’ claims to have given us the Bible
    and
  2. The Catholic ‘Church’ has abused children,
    Then one must logically assume that the Catholic ‘Church’ is just as culpable in the abuses as it is responsible for the Bible, correct?
Hmm, that is poor programming. If I were writing a program, I would first gather all the facts. Firstly, I would create a Truth Chart. For instance, I would ask myself, “Does ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ OR does ‘Church’ = 'collection of individuals”? Because, if ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ is true, then “‘Institution’ abused children” is true. That is ridiculous, since an ‘institution’ cannot do anything physically to anyone. So your logic fails. But if ‘Church’ = ‘collection of individuals’ is true, then “‘Church’ wrote Bible” must be true, by your logic. But, as you said, I didn’t write the Bible, and I consider ‘Me’ = ‘Catholic’ to be true. And since I’m Catholic, I must be a part of the ‘Church’. And since I’m part of the ‘Church’, I must have written the Bible. Which we all know is ridiculous. So the logic fails again.

Now, you seem to fancy yourself a logician. Let’s have the logic.
 
No, you are not. I have only read up to this point, but I have yet to hear you logically explain how the two statements you supposedly hear over and over are illogical. WHY are they illogical. Explain it to me logically. ‘You can’t take credit for the positive and pass the buck on the negative’ means absolutely nothing. You love logic so much, surely you can use it to explain your position. I program computers, I use logic every day. So I’ll try to get down to the bones of it.

You say that since
  1. The Catholic ‘Church’ claims to have given us the Bible
    and
  2. The Catholic ‘Church’ has abused children,
    Then one must logically assume that the Catholic ‘Church’ is just as culpable in the abuses as it is responsible for the Bible, correct?
Hmm, that is poor programming. If I were writing a program, I would first gather all the facts. Firstly, I would create a Truth Chart. For instance, I would ask myself, “Does ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ OR does ‘Church’ = 'collection of individuals”? Because, if ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ is true, then “‘Institution’ abused children” is true. That is ridiculous, since an ‘institution’ cannot do anything physically to anyone. So your logic fails. But if ‘Church’ = ‘collection of individuals’ is true, then “‘Church’ wrote Bible” must be true, by your logic. But, as you said, I didn’t write the Bible, and I consider ‘Me’ = ‘Catholic’ to be true. And since I’m Catholic, I must be a part of the ‘Church’. And since I’m part of the ‘Church’, I must have written the Bible. Which we all know is ridiculous. So the logic fails again.

Now, you seem to fancy yourself a logician. Let’s have the logic.
HINT! If I were designing a circuit board, I would use an AND gate for this one!
 
Not only is he misinformed, and uneducated in the faith, he truly believes this.
But with his posting this, only shows how hard it is for non-Catholics to accept this to be true.
So, all of the non-catholic Christian priest has done no sin at all? Wow, their list of Saints must be longer than ours.
 
There are a few differences that the orthodox have compared to the Catholic church after the schism…papal authority, indulgences, filoque, Marian dogma, immaculate, conception, purgatory ect…
Yes, there are differences between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, but you said that the difference is in the Catholic Church between then and now. I ask again, what is the difference?

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
I think a NAND gate would be better.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichen
The OP needs an AND, since he proposes the output to be true. But from my perspective, you are absolutely correct, since I propose IF ‘Church’ = ‘Institution’ NAND ‘Church’ = ‘collection of individuals’, THEN “‘Church’ responsible for both good and evil” = FALSE
 
And it is nothing but an astounding coincidence that they all came up with the same list, right?
Yes, all the denominations (including The Catholic Church) that have made a formal, officially acknowledgment of the canonical list of books have embrace the same list (the DEUTERO books aside, not more than 1 denomination agrees on that).

But the ecumenical embrace of the list of books is no indicator that the specific, particular, singular The Catholic Church “gave us” the Bible: from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21 and all the material in between.

**Now, back to the subject of this thread: The often made Catholic claim that The Catholic Church gave us all the corpus of material from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21: the whole Bible and all therein. **

.
 
…the DEUTERO books aside, not more than 1 denomination agrees on that…
Still living in La-La land, aren’t you CJ.

Catholics and Eastern Orthodox and Traditional Anglicans - i.e. 80% of Christianity - accept the Deuterocanonicals. The fact that the Johnny-Come-Lately protestants do not accept them is of no consequence.
 
Catholics and Eastern Orthodox and Traditional Anglicans - i.e. 80% of Christianity - accept the Deuterocanonicals. The fact that the Johnny-Come-Lately protestants do not accept them is of no consequence.
No. The OO has one set of Deutero books. The EO has another unique set. The CC has another unique set. No more than one denomination agrees on the set of approved DEUTERO books. There’s no agreement beyond ONE denomination for any “set” of them. But all that is moot to the question of this thread. Did The Catholic Church (not the Jews, not the OO, not the EO, not God, not penmen, but the specific, particular The Catholic Church) give us all the material of Scripture from Genesis 1:1 - Revelation 22:21, all the words therein?

Now, back to the subject of this thread: The often made Catholic claim that The Catholic Church gave us all the corpus of material from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21: the whole Bible and all therein.

.
 
Now, back to the subject of this thread: The often made Catholic claim that The Catholic Church gave us all the corpus of material from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21: the whole Bible and all therein.
Red Herring. We have never made any such claim.

Here is a new subject for the thread: Why does AmericanJosiah keep letting the answers to his question go in one ear and out the other, and why does he keep asking the same question over and over again while ignoring the answers?
 
IC is right, the Church has made no such claim.

Truth is, most of the scriptures existed before the Catholic Church came into existence. While the rest was written by members of the Church after Christs death and resurrection, and by this it could also be said that the Church did write the NT.

In any case, what the Church did do was collect and declare what the true scriptures were, separating them from false writings, and by the Church’s authority a canon was decided upon. Even if some other denomination were to do the very same thing, we could not accept the canon with the same conscience, because it is only the Catholic Church that would have the God-given authority to do any such thing.
 
IC is right, the Church has made no such claim.
Although CATHOLICS often do. Anywhere from “The Catholic Church wrote the Bible” to “The Catholic Church gave us the Bible” and all variations of such.

Yes, my Catholic teachers ridiculed this often read/heard claim.
Truth is, most of the scriptures existed before the Catholic Church came into existence.
A point Catholics often seem to just not know, the very ones who keep shouting about how they know the history of all this - and Protestants don’t.

I’d say they ALL came into existence but that’s another issue for another day and thread.
While the rest was written by members of the Church after Christs death and resurrection, and by this it could also be said that the Church did write the NT.
  1. No denomination CAN write anything - including The Catholic Church. Obviously.
  2. We don’t even know WHO penned several of the NT books, so I’m puzzled how you can state as a dogmatic fact that THEY were all… anything.
  3. I’m not aware of any evidence that Paul or any NT penmen was officially registered in a congregation legally affiliated with The Catholic Church. We can regard them as Christians, and thus a part of the communion of saints (the one holy catholic church) but that doesn’t make them registered in congregations of The Catholic Church anymore than Sarah Palin can be regarded as registered in a congregation of The Catholic Church because she’s a Christian. Apples and oranges.
In any case, what the Church did do was collect and declare what the true scriptures were
Well, history shows it did not do the first. That was done (in many cases CENTURIES) before ANYTHING did ANYTHING in this regard. The MOST that historically can even be claimed is that it ACKNOWLEDGED what had already been embraced. Just as my Catholic teachers taught us. To ACKNOWLEDGE is not the same as to produce, write, give, select.
Even if some other denomination were to do the very same thing, we could not accept the canon with the same conscience, because it is only the Catholic Church that would have the God-given authority to do any such thing.
Well, whatever power self may claim for self is another issue for another day and thread. The reality is: most denominations have - in some formal, official way - acknowledged the Scriptures as such. You may regard Trent as “the authoritative voice” for YOU but the reality is: voices said the same thing before and after The Catholic Church.

Now, back to the subject of this thread: The often made Catholic claim that The Catholic Church gave us all the corpus of material from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21: the whole Bible and all therein.

.
 
ignoring the answers?
Because, so far - no Catholic has answered it. Did The Catholic Church (not Jews, not Christians, not God, not The Orthodox Church - but specifically, singularly, particularly The Catholic Church) “give” (not acknowledge or choose) “the Bible” (all the corpus of materials therein - the words from Genesis 1:1 - Revelation 22:21)? That’s the often made claim: “The Catholic Church gave the Bible to us.” Yes or No?

My Catholic teachers said no. In fact, they ridiculed this they admitted often made claim.
They taught me that GOD gave us the Bible, that GOD (not The Catholic Church) wrote it via His penmen (not The Catholic Church). And that most of it was acknowledged as Scripture CENTURIES before The Catholic Church even came into existence, and all of it before The Council of Hippo or Carthage. History agrees with them, and disagrees with the often made claim.

But so far, no Catholic here has answered the question. They’ve gone off into discussions of the NT, of formal denomination acknowledgments and a host of other issues - rather than answering the question.

.

.

.
 
That “often made claim” has been handled multiple times. Read through the previous pages. Or. Move. On.
  1. No denomination CAN write anything - including The Catholic Church. Obviously.
  1. We don’t even know WHO penned several of the NT books, so I’m puzzled how you can state as a dogmatic fact that THEY were all… anything.
  1. I’m not aware of any evidence that Paul or any NT penmen was officially registered in a congregation legally affiliated with The Catholic Church. We can regard them as Christians, and thus a part of the communion of saints (the one holy catholic church) but that doesn’t make them registered in congregations of The Catholic Church anymore than Sarah Palin can be regarded as registered in a congregation of The Catholic Church because she’s a Christian. Apples and oranges.
Well what did I say? I could have said Christians, Catholic, members of the Church, followers of Christ, whatever. Thing is, it would have meant the same thing, considering the era. It would be silly to demand that we refer to some sort of official registry.
 
AJ it’s like you’re trying desperately to find an answer that only you believe in (well, maybe a few un-informed others). Are you trying to convince yourself that you don’t accept the Churches authority, and that nothing is due in gratitude to the Church for giving us the bible as-we-know-it?

Sure the OT was written before the Church was established, but the NT had not been written. So once again, to confront “The often made Catholic claim that The Catholic Church gave us all the corpus of material from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21: the whole Bible and all therein.” No. But might I ask, because you said it is such an often made claim (many times), could you please point us in the direction of a few of these places? And come on, you’re smart, you know how the Church works, could you even find the Church making this claim for us? Because, as you know, it really doesn’t matter if we have some random Catholics running around making this claim, you should know we all make these sort of mistakes.
 
The Catholic Church finalized the canon of sacrd scripture by sifting through all the different scriptures and decided which were inspired and which were not. The ones that were inspired were put together became known as the Bible.
 
Because, so far - no Catholic has answered it. Did The Catholic Church (not Jews, not Christians, not God, not The Orthodox Church - but specifically, singularly, particularly The Catholic Church) “give” (not acknowledge or choose) “the Bible” (all the corpus of materials therein - the words from Genesis 1:1 - Revelation 22:21)? That’s the often made claim: “The Catholic Church gave the Bible to us.” Yes or No?

My Catholic teachers said no. In fact, they ridiculed this they admitted often made claim.
They taught me that GOD gave us the Bible, that GOD (not The Catholic Church) wrote it via His penmen (not The Catholic Church). And that most of it was acknowledged as Scripture CENTURIES before The Catholic Church even came into existence, and all of it before The Council of Hippo or Carthage. History agrees with them, and disagrees with the often made claim.

But so far, no Catholic here has answered the question. They’ve gone off into discussions of the NT, of formal denomination acknowledgments and a host of other issues - rather than answering the question.
But don’t you understand??? You’ve received the answer many times over… THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS THE BIBLE before the Catholic Church assembled the inspired Scriptures to assemble the Bible. Call it what you will, from the institution of the Church to today’s Catholic Church, it was the same batch of Christians that put the books together to form what we call the Bible.

The scriptures before the Bible were all Jewish ( Old Testament ) and those same Christians, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, included those scriptures in the Bible.
If it were not for the Catholic Church indicating which were inspired and which were not, and included the Jewish scriptures, who knows what sort of mish-mash you’d have today.

As for those teachers, I’m sorry to say that they did not know what they were talking about. Also if they were Catholic, I don’t think they did a good job of teaching you.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top