**Hi Christian,Question: Protestants go to hell, right? Just wondering.
The correct answer may be YES!, and so will Animistics, Catholics, Buddhist, Islamics, Jews, Hindus and others.Question: Protestants go to hell, right? Just wondering.
Oh really? So then the Catholic church is the plumb and the level now? I thought that Paul specifically called Scripture that.I am not sure that catholics have the right to criticize others, but since the It of from the Catholic church that all other come from, either directly or indirectly, The Catholic Church has a responsibility to point oiut the errors of the others.
Proud member of a “Counterfeit” Religion!Why do Catholics judge me?
Who gives them the right to judge?
I run into Catholics all the time who tell me I am going to hell, or that I am not a “whole” or “pure” Christian.
Now, what’s up with that?![]()
What if he is Orthodox? Are you saying that he would still have not received the body blood soul and divinity of Christ?Proud member of a “Counterfeit” Religion!
hi christian knight- i have not read the rest of thread and am not sure if someone already commented on your post. i’m sorry that some catholics were judging you, that’s not christlike. however, i suggest you reconsider your banner. i assume you’re not catholic and if true, you have not received the body and blood of the Lord (Jn 6:53 ff). unless you do, you do not have life within you. God bless.
He said elsewhere he’s a baptist, interested in catholicism.What if he is Orthodox? Are you saying that he would still have not received the body blood soul and divinity of Christ?
So therefore according to the dictation from your church, he could not possibly have received the Real Presence in his communion.He said elsewhere he’s a baptist, interested in catholicism.
sorry for my confusion. under 44pres name shows banned, yet he keeps posting. any reason? thanks.I would recommend that any further posters to this thread stay on topic and remember their Christian charity.
Thank you.
orthodox does, but is he?What if he is Orthodox? Are you saying that he would still have not received the body blood soul and divinity of Christ?
**St Paul called scripture the Plumb and the level? Boy, was I sleeping! Can you provide the chapter and verse please?Oh really? So then the Catholic church is the plumb and the level now? I thought that Paul specifically called Scripture that.
I’m not baptised. I belong to no church. Yet.So therefore according to the dictation from your church, he could not possibly have received the Real Presence in his communion.
I dont know what Baptists believe in relation to the real presence.So therefore according to the dictation from your church, he could not possibly have received the Real Presence in his communion.
**orthodox does, but is he?
Correct. Not Scripture. The Church. Catholics do not interpret the Bible to suit themselves. The Church is the final arbiter and bulwark of truth.Oh really? So then the Catholic church is the plumb and the level now? I thought that Paul specifically called Scripture that.
What tells you that?Correct. Not Scripture. The Church. Catholics do not interpret the Bible to suit themselves. The Church is the final arbiter and bulwark of truth.
**I dont know what Baptists believe in relation to the real presence.
Jesus Himself is the plumb and the level of Truth. He has revealed HImself to the Church, and the Church produced the Scriptures, which testify of Him. The Church is the pillar and ground of the Truth.Oh really? So then the Catholic church is the plumb and the level now? I thought that Paul specifically called Scripture that.
No. We recognize that the Orthodox have valid Holy Orders, and valid Sacraments.What if he is Orthodox? Are you saying that he would still have not received the body blood soul and divinity of Christ?
It is not a “dictation” but a pardosis. Jesus instituted the Last Supper. He is the one who set it up so that it would reflect the unity that He established for the Church.So therefore according to the dictation from your church, he could not possibly have received the Real Presence in his communion.
Jesus was clear that disputes were to be taken to the Church for resolution.What tells you that?
Scripture does such a complete job of lighting the way! Thanks.God does not want a religion with you, He wants a relationship. I do not care what religion you belong to, the only way we can have a relationship with God is through His Son Jesus Christ and the words He gave us in the Holy Bible. Jhn 12:48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.
2Ti 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
God is awesome my friend. No one will go to hell unloved John 3:16 tells us that. its a free gift all you have to do is receive it.
Jhn 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: How can you recive this Free Gift
We all know we are sinners the bible tells us that,
Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Rom 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Rom 10:11** For the scripture saith**, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Rom 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Rom 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
1 Timothy 3:15What tells you that?
wow. this is truly informative. if you don’t mind can you share your source? thx.Well Ag_not, that would depend on several things,
( What a box of worms you just opened!) by Baptist did you mean Baptists, Southern Baptists, or Free Will Baptists or one of their various associations, conferences, conventions, fellowships, groups, or unions? What is the difference you ask? That is easy to explain!
**Not the differences, but the reason why no one can make the differences clear even the baptist themselves! They have no idea! With their various associations, conferences, conventions, fellowships, groups, and unions around the world even Baptists can’t even keep accurate track of their own sub-denominations. There are about 50 just in the USA many of which may also have modified there own groups doctrinal stance to Free and General Baptists! **
**Unlike Catholicism, Baptist can only trace their church’s existence to 1639 when founded by Roger Williams in the area that would become the city of Providence in the USA. Side by side with the larger body of Baptists, Ten sectsexist, they are found chiefly in the USA. I will not list their historical and doctrinal relationships by their historical connection to the three “Original doctrinal variations” of Baptist. I could try but I actually think that might be close to impossible. Besides as I said the groups probably have modified their doctrinal stance to Free and General Baptists by now or will soon. **
**(1) The Baptist Church of Christ originated about 1808, Its doctrine is a mild form of Calvinism, with belief in a general atonement and admission of feet-washing as religious ordinance. **
**(2) The Campbellites, Disciples of Christ, or Christians, date back as a distinct religious body to the early part of the nineteenth century. They are the outgrowth of that movement which manifested itself simultaneously in some of the other religious denominations in the United States in favor of the Bible alone without creeds. **
**(3) The Dunkards (German: tunken, “to dip”), German Baptists, or Brethren, were founded about 1708 in Germany. By 1729, they had all emigrated to the USA. Today many divisions have taken place among them. They practice threefold immersion, Their communion service, preceded by the agape, are held in the evenings. **
**(4) The Freewill Baptists correspond in doctrine and practice to the English General Baptists, but originated in the United States. They exist in two distinct bodies. The older was founded in 1729. Many of its members subsequently joined the Regular Baptists. Those who did not unite became known as the “Free Willers” and later as the “Original Freewill Baptists”. The larger body of the “Freewill Baptists” was founded in 1780. The denomination spread throughout New England and the West, and was joined in 1841 by the “Free-Communion Baptists”. It has changed its official name to “Free Baptists”. The American General Baptists are in substantial doctrinal agreement with the Freewill Baptists. **
**(5) The Old Two-Seed-in-the-Spirit “Predestinarian” Baptists are Manichaean in doctrine, basically holding that there are two seeds, one of good and one of evil. **
**(6) The Primitive Baptists, also called Old-School, Anti-Mission, and Hard-Shell, Baptists since 1835 has constituted a sect which is opposed to missions, Sunday schools, and in general to human religious institutions. **
(7) The foundation of the Separate and of the United Baptists was the result, either immediate or mediate, of the attitude taken by some Baptists toward the “Whitefield revival movement of the eighteenth century” (Don’t ask!)
(8) The Seventh-Day Baptists differ from the tenets of the Baptists generally only in their observance of the seventh day of the week as the Sabbath of the Lord. “Sabbatarian Baptists” organized in 1671. In 1818 the name Seventh Day Baptists was adopted.
**(9) The Six-principle Baptists are a small body and date from the seventeenth century. They are so called from the six doctrines of their creed, contained in Heb., vi, 1-2: **
**(a) Repentance from dead works; **
(b) Faith toward God;
(c) The doctrine of Baptism;
**(d) The imposition of hands; **
(e) The resurrection of the dead;
**(f) Eternal judgment. **
(10) The Winebrennerians or Church of God were founded in 1829. They acknowledge three Divine ordinances: (sacraments)
baptism,
**feet-washing, **
**and the Lord’s Supper **