The Catholic Church wrong? Part two

  • Thread starter Thread starter twb1621
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus’ teachings are all based on love of Him.

Because I’m not saying they are going to hell, doesn’t mean I’m saying they are going to heaven. It simply means I don’t know. No one can know for certain that someone else has gone to hell, for Jesus is the Judge of us all. Of course, there are a few people that I’d be willing to bet a ton of money on!!! 😉

Oh, and now that I’m somewhat caught up on this thread and I’m not flying through it (you guys have been busy since last night!!!), I see what you were getting at. Sorry to have spoiled the moment.
Thank you. I like that I don’t know . It tells me that you are humble enough to accept that you donot totally know about these things. Other people however are so sure they are going to heaven simply because they believe in Jesus forgetting other things Jesus told us to do.
 
I asked Hank this question because he said to be saved you have to have faith in Jesus and you do not have to do works and that you only do good works because you believe in Jesus. So it means if you do not believe in Jesus you cannot do good works. But Hindus and Buddhists love their neighbor too. If you are not saying that these people are going to hell, doesn’t it mean you are saying they are going to heaven, because there is only heaven or hell.
I have an opinion but I would rather go to the word of God. Jesus said, “I am The Way, The Truth and The Life, no man goes to the Father except by me.”

Now if these Buddhist or Hindu followed Christ, then they would not be Buddhist or Hindu, but Christians. So, if they are not Christians, Jesus says, no. They are not going through the Only Way to the Father, which is through Jesus. They will then go to Hell. They do have the opportunity to repent of their sins, but if they continue in their idol whorship, then they have rejected the Son of God and rejected the life He offers.
 
I have an opinion but I would rather go to the word of God. Jesus said, “I am The Way, The Truth and The Life, no man goes to the Father except by me.”

Now if these Buddhist or Hindu followed Christ, then they would not be Buddhist or Hindu, but Christians. So, if they are not Christians, Jesus says, no. They are not going through the Only Way to the Father, which is through Jesus. They will then go to Hell. They do have the opportunity to repent of their sins, but if they continue in their idol whorship, then they have rejected the Son of God and rejected the life He offers.
You would go a long way if you have NotWorthy’s humility. IMO he is a true Christian.
 
You would go a long way if you have NotWorthy’s humility. IMO he is a true Christian.
The bible speaks of who is under God’s wrath. How can you love someone if you do not warn them they are under God’s wrath. Humility is knowing you will be rejected for telling the truth, yet speaking the truth regardless.
 
You should rethink what you said about being saved. It IS in fact the same as being a child of God. Everyone is a creation of God, but sindce Adam they were born in sin. But everyone “who calls upon the name of the Lord” is saved. Paul said to a bunch of Christians in all degrees of maturity, immaturity, struggling, learning, etc (the church in Ephesus)…“For by grace YOU HAVE BEEN SAVED, through faith, and that not of yourselves. it is a gift of God, not as a result of works, so that no one can boast.” Notice their salvation is past tense (actually with continuing result–it is a past perfect tense). They were all children of God, and, look out…if you care to honor the first few verses in Ephesisan, they were all saints as well. Time to do some serious, prayerful rethinking???
Thanks for pointing out that this verse is speaking in past tense. I didn’t notice it that way before. That makes it all that much more powerful. How can someone work out a salvation when it has already BEEN done?
 
We are created by God, So the part that says, “nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” applies to even ourselves. There is NOTHING that can separate us from Christ, once we are saved.
was sin a creation of God’s. You really need to read more of the responses so you don’t sound like you live in a vacuum.
 
I have to ask, which sins did Jesus not fully cover with His blood? If you can show me somewhere that says Jesus only died for the sins prior to His offering of salvation, then we need to atone for those sins, but until then, I have biblical reasons to believe when Jesus forgives us our sins, they are ALL forgiven. This is not an excuse to continue in sins and do nothing. This is rather an open invitation from Jesus to repent of our sins and to follow Him out of love and thankfulness. This is truely “Grace.”

For the sake of this argument about deeds, let’s say that someone is saved and he didn’t show any good deeds. You may argue and say that if he has no deeds to show, then he was not given salvation, but his good deed may have been thanking God for the free gift of salvation. Is that enough of a good deed and remember, this is God’s judgement to make? Jesus, Paul, Peter and many others have spoken of good deeds, but those deeds are between God and the doer of those deeds. Man cannot gauge the quality or quantity of a man’s good deeds if God is the only one who can see into his heart. I do agree, that God calls us to things He has prepared for us. It is not true to say we must do good deeds or we are not saved. Failure to do good deeds may be a sin, but ALL of the sins of a saved man are forgiven through Christ.
You show me where it says God gave His salvation to all man regardless of what or any sin man will create thereafter unconditionally and against any other scripture teachings. You read now Hank… You always ask for something more when you have no support and then you wont read it. YOu show all your support now, I’ll wait for you.😉
 
One cannot pull one verse out of the bible and live by it alone.

John 3:16 (King James Version)

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

While Presbyterian I like this sermon, not by faith alone.
febc.edu.sg/assets/treasury_sermons/treasury_of_sermons99_26sep.htm

Be a good stewart of your talents. Being saved is like receiving a talent, if you have that one talent when your master comes back bad news, make the most of you talent (good works) and then you please your master.
Well said, Thanks.
 
Thanks for pointing out that this verse is speaking in past tense. I didn’t notice it that way before. That makes it all that much more powerful. How can someone work out a salvation when it has already BEEN done?
Study a little closer. Someone’s sanctification and their justification are addressed in the New Testament as:
a) a past action
b) a present action
and
c) a future action.

Hence, the Catholic Teaching that these are Processes, not singular events!
 
You would go a long way if you have NotWorthy’s humility. IMO he is a true Christian.
Whoshie! I’m short on time, but you make me glad I took the time to read this thread.

As Hank says, we MUST teach the Truth, but we must do it a little more gently than some of our brothers do. Jesus didn’t sit on a soapbox accros the Temple screaming at people to repent or be damned. John the Baptist may have done that, but you had to go out to the wilderness to hear the message.

As a matter of fact, most of Jesus’ greatest teachings were in remote places. Those that immediately heard the message were those that were seeking the Truth. We should lead others to Christ by our actions, by the way we love one another and the way we treat one another, especially when we happen to disagree with them.

That is a tool that the Holy Spirit will use to guide other sheep to the True Flock, my Brother (or is it Sister?)!

God Bless and thanks again for the kind words and reminding me what is important!

John
 
The bible speaks of who is under God’s wrath. How can you love someone if you do not warn them they are under God’s wrath. Humility is knowing you will be rejected for telling the truth, yet speaking the truth regardless.
That’s being frank or forthright.

Humility - the quality of being Humble;
Humble;
1: not proud or haughty : not arrogant or assertive
2: reflecting, expressing, or offered in a spirit of deference or submission humble apology
 
We are created by God, So the part that says, “nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” applies to even ourselves. There is NOTHING that can separate us from Christ, once we are saved.
You are equating things that are not equal, Hank. True, nothing can separate us from the love of God, and nothing can undo our adoption as sons. But neither of those things means that we will be with him for an eternity.
I have to ask, which sins did Jesus not fully cover with His blood? If you can show me somewhere that says Jesus only died for the sins prior to His offering of salvation, then we need to atone for those sins, but until then, I have biblical reasons to believe when Jesus forgives us our sins, they are ALL forgiven.
Jesus’ blood does not cover the sins of those who reject His purpose for themselves. He desires all to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth. However, not all are saved, because not all will meet the conditions He has set forth for salvation. Remember, He is the passover sacrifice. No one whose lintel was not covered by the blood of the lamb was spared. That is the choice of the person.
This is not an excuse to continue in sins and do nothing. This is rather an open invitation from Jesus to repent of our sins and to follow Him out of love and thankfulness. This is truely “Grace.”
I am glad to hear that you do not follow the heretical teaching that grace means it is ok to sin. 👍
For the sake of this argument about deeds, let’s say that someone is saved and he didn’t show any good deeds. You may argue and say that if he has no deeds to show, then he was not given salvation, but his good deed may have been thanking God for the free gift of salvation. Is that enough of a good deed and remember, this is God’s judgement to make?
Yes. This is what the Catholic Church teaches.
Jesus, Paul, Peter and many others have spoken of good deeds, but those deeds are between God and the doer of those deeds.
Well, yes and no. They were all very clear that the deeds affect those around us also, and may be involved in the salvation not only of ourselves, but ofothers.
Man cannot gauge the quality or quantity of a man’s good deeds if God is the only one who can see into his heart. I do agree, that God calls us to things He has prepared for us. It is not true to say we must do good deeds or we are not saved.
This is certainly true, as there are some that are saved and unable to do any good deeds. We would count among them baptized infants, disabled, perhaps the elderly frail, etc.
Failure to do good deeds may be a sin, but ALL of the sins of a saved man are forgiven through Christ.
Only if the person meets the conditions. See, the Apostles taught that our salvation, which begins at baptism, is worked out while we are here on earth, and is not complete until we are in our final glory. During any of that time, a person can choose to turn their back on God.
The bible speaks of who is under God’s wrath. How can you love someone if you do not warn them they are under God’s wrath. Humility is knowing you will be rejected for telling the truth, yet speaking the truth regardless.
Is that why you are here, Hank? Did you come to CAF to warn us about God’s wrath?
Thanks for pointing out that this verse is speaking in past tense. I didn’t notice it that way before. That makes it all that much more powerful. How can someone work out a salvation when it has already BEEN done?
This is a very good question. First of all, let us agree that scripture is clear about working out our salvation, so we do need to reconcile these concepts.

second, Scripture is equally clear that God is at work in us to will and to do His good pleasure. This is where the 'Apostolic notion of “cooperation with grace” is reflected in the scripture. Throughout our lives, we work together with the HS that has been placed within us at the moment we are sealed in Him. This is part of fighting the good fight.
 
You should rethink what you said about being saved.
Has it occurred to you that it is quite cheeky for you to breeze into a Catholic board and begin telling people there what they should do? Is this your normal means of evangelism?
Code:
It IS in fact the same as being a child of God.  Everyone is a creation of God, but sindce Adam they were born in sin.  But everyone "who calls upon the name of the Lord" is saved.
I agree. What we are discussing here is people who began in faith, calling upon the name of the Lord, then fall from grace, and stop calling on His name. There are some on this thread who seem to think that failure to finish the race is not relevant, and that one can begin in faith, finish in sin, and still be saved. 🤷
Paul said to a bunch of Christians in all degrees of maturity, immaturity, struggling, learning, etc (the church in Ephesus)…“For by grace YOU HAVE BEEN SAVED, through faith, and that not of yourselves. it is a gift of God, not as a result of works, so that no one can boast.” Notice their salvation is past tense (actually with continuing result–it is a past perfect tense). They were all children of God, and, look out…if you care to honor the first few verses in Ephesisan, they were all saints as well. Time to do some serious, prayerful rethinking???
firm, this passage was written by a Catholic, to Catholics. It is Catholic teaching! No, there is no need for rethinking. Catholics believe that we are born again in baptism, and transferred from the Kingdom of darkenss into the kingdom of light. We are set aside for God’s work -made holy- (sainted) and are then to walk in the good works that He has prepared beforehand that we should walk in them. Some who begin this way do not continue to fight the good fight, and they throw away their inheritance.

What you seem to be suggesting is that it is not possible to burn our adoption papers, and leave the House of Him who purchased us with His blood. 🤷
 
Trying to reason with anti-Catholics bears little fruit. After all, they already know everything, isn’t that right, Hank. They personally have insight granted them by the Holy Spirit no Catholic could ever have. The real problem is pride. They have declared themselves their own infallible Pope because they are always right. i’m very close to adopting a “one strike” policy. The first time somone makes a ludicrous accusation against the Church, or infers they have more scriptural knowledge than has been amassed in the 2000 year history of the Blessed Mother Church, they get ignored.
 
Hi, firmfoundation,

While I am confident that guanophore has been both prayerful and thoughtful, allow me to comment on your post.
You should rethink what you said about being saved. It IS in fact the same as being a child of God.
One of the problems that I am having with these posts is that a particular point is brought up and the respondent either chooses to ignore it - as in no response - or choose simply not to address it. This causes both confusion as to what is actually under discussion or how have these disagreements been resolved.

As I appreciate the post, the real issue was not being a child of God (!) but, of actually rejecting one’s inheritance. God created everything - therefore everything is good. God created free will - and even before God created Adam - God created the angels. About one-third (rough estimate) of these God created spirits freely chose to not worship God. Another way to put this is that they no longer wanted to be part of what they thought was God’s Plan… Unfortunately, their willful and deliberate disobedience put them in another part of God’s Plan that all of us would do well to recognize. Hell is real… and no one gets their by accident.

It is true that we can not ‘work’ or ‘earn’ our way to heaven. We have been redeemed by the Most Precious Blood of the Lamb. Our salvation, however, is something that we just can’t say, “Lord! Lord!” to (to quote Matthew 25). We are expected to WORK with the talents (10 talents, 5 talents, 1 talent) God has given us.

Chances are, the servant who had only 1 talent - and then chose NOT to WORK with it - had several issues we can only guess about. For example, he was in the Master’s House, he was a trusted servant (after all, he did get the 1 talent) - so, maybe he had his own version of OSAS… except it would have sounded like Once in the Master’s House Always in the Master’s House! Admittedly, speculative - but, bear with me for a moment. If this is anything like what we see today - is it possible that we could look to this parable (Luke 19:12-28) and just how the Master characterized this servant’s approach to the task at hand. Not only did the Master verbally criticize this servant as “lazy” but, took the talent away from him and gave it to the servant with 10 talents.

While the continuity of the story on the servant is not as clear as I would like it (did the Master also throw the servant out of the House?) Luke 19:28 has a far more deadly ending but dealing with those who did not want the King to be King over them. The King had these people brought before him and they were killed in the presence of the King. Coming as the next sentence after the servant with the talents - this is hardly a reassuring ending for some who thought that he would not be punished if he did not WORK. Hardly reassuring for a version of Once in the Master’s House Always in the Master’s House!

Maybe prayerful reflection has no bounds on any of us on this list.

God bless
 
Thanks for pointing out that this verse is speaking in past tense. I didn’t notice it that way before. That makes it all that much more powerful. How can someone work out a salvation when it has already BEEN done?
Well Paul says “Work OUT you salvation…” But he doesn’t say work FOR it! We have to harmonize all of scripture. We work out what God put IN us the moment we were saved (IF in fact we WERE saved). RCC’s seem to have very little concept of all that happened at the moment of salvation. Paul makes such a huge deal about it. Makes me wonder why he does and they don’t??? I’m reminded of the difference between someone who has seen the Grand Canyon and someone who has only seen pictures of it. Night and day difference. Or someone who has read about having achild vs someone who has one! Or someone who has a good father vs someone who was orphaned and has only read about fathers. Why does Paul talk so much about the phenomenon of the salvation event and tell believers he is praying they will comprehend the magnitude of it, yet…???
 
Well Paul says “Work OUT you salvation…” But he doesn’t say work FOR it! We have to harmonize all of scripture. We work out what God put IN us the moment we were saved (IF in fact we WERE saved). RCC’s seem to have very little concept of all that happened at the moment of salvation. Paul makes such a huge deal about it. Makes me wonder why he does and they don’t??? I’m reminded of the difference between someone who has seen the Grand Canyon and someone who has only seen pictures of it. Night and day difference. Or someone who has read about having achild vs someone who has one! Or someone who has a good father vs someone who was orphaned and has only read about fathers. Why does Paul talk so much about the phenomenon of the salvation event and tell believers he is praying they will comprehend the magnitude of it, yet…???
Salvation is not a moment. It is a lifetime process. This “moment of Salvation” is what leads one down the OSAS tripe that is so prevalent, and yet still wrong.

You may break into the Salvific State in but a moment, but you must strive to maintain your salvation throughout your time in this world.
 
Salvation is not a moment. It is a lifetime process. .

You may break into the Salvific State in but a moment, but you must strive to maintain your salvation throughout your time in this world.
if this where not a true statement one might as well give in to tempatations…did not St.Paul also write that the flesh and spirit work against each other…
 
if this where not a true statement one might as well give in to tempatations…did not St.Paul also write that the flesh and spirit work against each other…
Which is why I thank God for the wonderful Gift of the Sacrament of Confession!!!

Its one of the most neglected gifts He offers, even among Catholics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top