I
Isa_Almisry
Guest
trustinyou;3284365:
Yes, deeper denial. That’s a direct line to the truth.What’s called “roman catholic” today?
trustinyou;3284365:
Yes, deeper denial. That’s a direct line to the truth.What’s called “roman catholic” today?
As much as you beg the question, 2nd, it doesn’t change the answer.But there was no “Orthodox Chruch” back then, so they can’t be the Church Fathers of any Church today other than that of The Catholic Church.
Now I’m wondering what’s in the cup.That’s talking about The Orthodox Church that exists today.
The Catholic Church is an “orthodox” (not “Orthodox”) church.
The “Orthodox” Church is not a Catholic Church, but an Orthodox (not “orthodox”) church.
Still haven’t shown me where in history the term or phrase “Orthodox Church” or “Orthodox Catholic Church” exists before the 11th century.
:coffeeread:
No. Haven’t seen any “Orthodox Faith” in your references.Now I’m wondering what’s in the cup.
You’ve been shown frequent references to the Orthodox Faith of the Catholic Church. So either your church is confessing our Faith (which we agree, it’s not) or you have been shown the reference to the Orthodox Church way before the schism (btw, the term you are trying to get is “schismatic”). Take your pick.
I tried to send you this PM, but it seems that your box is too full to accept any PM’s.Take your pick.
It “ain’t” Catholic (capitol “C”).Your begging the question again.
Your using equivocation with the proper names of the churches and the qualities of the churches. If you believe the Orthodox Church is not orthodox then state your case.
No, actually, it says how it ‘came to’ be known as The Orthodx Church (which is, again, talking about The Church known as The Orthodox Church today).It’s saying that the Orthodox Church “that exists today” is the same Church that has always existed in the East.
What do you think “IT” is refering to?No, actually, it says how it ‘came to’ be known as The Orthodx Church (which is, again, talking about The Church known as The Orthodox Church today).
“IT” is obviously The Orthodox Church of today.What do you think “IT” is refering to?
Fallacy. Nonsequitor. The proper name of the church has no bearing is whether what they teach is orthodox or not.It “ain’t” Catholic (capitol “C”).
Wow! Great!I’ll answer for you
IT is refering to the Catholic Church in the East. IT was called “Orthodox” before the schism according to your own historians.
Not a good idea to kick dirt on the scholarship of your own historians just to make a fallacious nonsequitor argument.(Not a modern day essay on how the modern Orthodox Church got it’s name “after” the 11th Century)
Ohhh…I see.Fallacy. Nonsequitor. The proper name of the church has no bearing is whether what they teach is orthodox or not.
According to any reasonable person, it doesn’t matter. Protestants churches are called the “Church of Christ” (actually a more ancient proper name than Catholic). But that proves nothing. Also, the See of Utrecht, is called the Catholic Church, but that also proves nothing. It is a fallaciuos argument. The proper name is just a label. It is the Faith that they hold that matters.Ohhh…I see.
So according to you, names “don’t” matter?
According to any reasonable person, it doesn’t matter.
I’m never said that The Roman Catholic Church was anything. I never talked about any Roman Catholic Church.Frankly, your argument that “the Roman Catholic Church is orthodox because we’re Catholic with a big “C”” is one of the silliest arguments I’ve ever heard (and I’ve heard a lot). You’re really grasping at straws on this one.
Do you have any evidence that The Catholic Church was called “Church of Christ” officially “before” the 2nd Century?the “Church of Christ” (actually a more ancient proper name than Catholic).