T
takers
Guest
In watching one of the Theology of the Body DVDs this topic came up and the presenter had an answer that I thought was really great. Take the analogy of having sex is like inviting God to a party. Every time you have sex (withing the confines of marriage, of course) you’re sending God an invite. Now, God can make the decision to accept the invite (make a baby) or not accept the invite (not make a baby). But, if you use birth control it’s similar to sending God an invite (having sex) but then telling God not to come to the party (through using BC). Sending an invite then telling a person to not show up is pretty rude. Through NFP you either send an invite or don’t send an invite. Either way, you’re not being rude to God.I really have a hard time with the whole NFP thing. On one hand the Church tells us that no one is created by accident and who is not part of God’s plan. That God has to will a person to exist and utimately He creates that person, not us. This is very hard for me to explain, but I don’t understand how anyone can say it’s o.k. to limit their families at all? Doesn’t that kind of take away from God’s utimate plan? What if you were avoiding a pregnancy and missed out on a person God had intended for? Or got pregnant during a time you did not want to? Isn’t the ultimate goal eternity for all of us? What does it mean then, when people say that God will not give you more than you can handle? It’s not really completely up to us how many children we have. Ultimately, it’s up to God. There are people who try and try and get no children. There are those who think they are avoiding and end up pregnant. Is it more important to have a big house to live in and 2cars, or for God to have that many more eternal souls with Him in heaven for His glory? I struggle with this myself, when trying to discern whether or not to avoid using NFP. snip