The Duggars Respond to Reports That Josh Duggar Was Accused of Child Molestation

  • Thread starter Thread starter DakiniArtist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ve read the reactions of this board and several other boards.
This was a child who did this. It was wrong, and I have no doubt that his parents dealt with him and this issue. We have no idea what kind of counseling or if there was counseling to anyone, the girls or Josh. And honestly, it’s none of our business.
They were all children 14 or less of age. 13, 14, 15 year old boys are very interesting creatures, one minute they do something so incredibly stupid and the next they do some thing wise beyond their years.
How many of you would honestly pick up the phone and call the police and have them come and arrest your child and question your child and have your entire family put into the system?
This was a 13-14 year old young man who repeatedly abused his sisters. He was protected from consequences. His sisters were subjected to continued, close exposure to their abuser. If, instead of Josh Duggar, we were talking about a 14-year-old, inner city gang member who shot and killed four members of a rival gang would the, “he’s just a child” defense still count?

You’re right that teenage boys can be incredibly stupid. They have more hormones than brains. That doesn’t mean they don’t know right from wrong or that they can’t control their own impulses. When I was that age I had a close female friend who, despite my best efforts to the contrary, got my hormones going just about every time I looked at her. There were numerous occasions where she fell asleep on my couch, others where we fell asleep on the couch together, etc. Not once did I consider “copping a feel” or doing anything inappropriate. Why? Because it was clearly and obviously wrong.

As far as the sort of counseling he got, Jim Bob was so unsure he couldn’t even come up with the name of the facility. Michelle had a better memory:
Det. Hignite then asked Mrs. Duggar about the training center they sent _____ to. She said it was not really a training center. Det. Hignite asked if the guy _____ talked to was a certified Counselor. She said no. She said it was a guy they know in Little Rock that is remodeling a building. Det. Hignite asked if the guy was more of a mentor. She said kind of.
 
Woody Allen debuted his latest film Blue Jasmine in 2013. He is still being interviewed by the media and held up as a Hollywood icon.
He’s been hated by a lot of people for a long time. Part of why he’s excused is b/c his ex Mia Farrow engaged in an exceptionally bitter separation/divorce and custody battle. In which she is accused of leading their daughter Dylan to falsely accuse Woody of incest. Dylan is of age now, she was about 7 at the time, and is standing by her claims.

Woody’s relationship with Soon-Yi sickened a lot of people but he is not biologically related to her and some say he didn’t spend enough time around her to be a father figure.

I’m not excusing him, but accusations of molestation in divorce/custody battles tend to really divide people. I think he was enough of a “father” type that the relationship with Soon-Yi was exploitative, and I believe Dylan.
 
What we are seeing here is the knee jerk defense of an individual seen as some kind of champion for the Conservative American “family values” ilk.

If this exact incident were being reported as occurring in a media family not seen as a right wing voice- I suspect that we would be reading a very different thread here.

It’s really classic “dodge and weave” tactics, and entirely predictable.
Sy Noe:
Ya got that right
As I suspected, this story isn’t about concern for little girls. It’s about hashing out personal grievances the American left advancing their agenda on the past mistakes of alleged “right wingers” who work to preserve the family, a concept their own base supports among many factions.

Once again, they prove me right. :yyeess:
 
How many of you would honestly pick up the phone and call the police and have them come and arrest your child and question your child and have your entire family put into the system?
I meant to respond to that part of your comment in my previous post but got distracted. I would absolutely and without hesitation pick up the phone, call the police and have them come and arrest my child if they ever did something like this. To do otherwise would be irresponsible and criminally unfair to the children who were victimized.
 
It’s “just too bad” that these parents allowed their daughters to be molested for at least a year and did nothing? That is simply appalling. And there is no question of innocence, he admitted the abuse then and admits it now.

I am not saying that a 14 or 15 year old is the same as an adult, but its not a little kid. The 9 year old victim is a little kid. I am also not saying that a 14 year old should be treated like an adult. But there were adults involved - his parents - and they knew about this abuse and let it go on for at least a year. Maybe you think that is “just too bad” but I think it is inexcusable. And, no, I don’t think reversing the genders would make it OK or that no one would care. You would not care if a 15 year old girl was abusing a nine year old boy?
I’m talking about Josh, not the parents.
 
Yes, but the difference is that he continues to make movies, receives awards, and is lauded in the press. He is a grown man and if you look at Wikipedia bio, he seems proud of what he did.
The same can’t be said for Bill Cosby, who will probably never have the same level of success again. So many people have come forward that I do believe them, and that’s also very sad. I’m not happy to see the Duggars in pain and I don’t rejoice over anyone else’s disgrace either.
 
As I suspected, this story isn’t about concern for little girls. It’s about hashing out personal grievances the American left advancing their agenda on the past mistakes of alleged “right wingers” who work to preserve the family, a concept their own base supports among many factions.

Once again, they prove me right. :yyeess:
Please do not speak for me when you say this. I don’t care who we are talking about.
  • I don’t rejoice in bad news about anyone
  • I don’t care who we are talking about, exploitation of children makes me sick. Whether that’s Hillary Clinton allegedly saying a young rape victim was insane to win a case (if true), or Lena Dunham, or any famous male entertainers, etc. it is all very sad and I don’t feel glee or political victory out of any of it.
 
=EmperorNapoleon;12992571]Repeatedly molesting his sisters and at least one other girl is criminal.
Age and mental status determine that in a court of law. A good example of a crime would be large, teenage male charging a cop and grabbing his gun.
That they didn’t realize what was happening is irrelevant particularly given their age and the sheltered life they lead.
Oh, I see. So I guess the solution is to encourage promiscuity among teenage boys? Is that where this is going? We all have heard how the American left just thinks we should let our kids be themselves with sex, cause we can’t stop them, right?
 
Please do not speak for me when you say this. I don’t care who we are talking about.
  • I don’t rejoice in bad news about anyone
  • I don’t care who we are talking about, exploitation of children makes me sick. Whether that’s Hillary Clinton allegedly saying a young rape victim was insane to win a case (if true), or Lena Dunham, or any famous male entertainers, etc. it is all very sad and I don’t feel glee or political victory out of any of it.
None of the comments from that account were quoted, so the point is moot.

Note: Multiple user accounts violate forum rules and are grounds for an automatic ban.
 
The same can’t be said for Bill Cosby, who will probably never have the same level of success again. So many people have come forward that I do believe them, and that’s also very sad. I’m not happy to see the Duggars in pain and I don’t rejoice over anyone else’s disgrace either.
Anyone can believe whomwever they want, but there are two very important things a lot of folks are missing:
  1. Josh has seemed to have repented. That may not count for much among Christians (in which case, the shame is yours and such arrogance and pride could cost you–-not Josh— greatly on Judgement Day) regardless of whether or not one has been abused. We all have our crosses to bear, and it’s sickening to see people using their own personal situation or political cause to try and take away the freedom of others.
There is nothing new or special about their situation, either. I’ve seen the exact same psychology with 9-11 victims and victims of police shootings.

And doubting someone acting in good faith is a cheap shot to say the least. :slapfight: Between this thread, the Family Life Forum and the complaints I’ve received from other users, I know I won’t be referring anyone to this site for help anytime soon for spiritual or emotional needs.
  1. Jail time, punishment ect. are determined by the courts. I realize a lot of Americans these days are shunning “innocent until proven guilty” for their own selfish desires, but there’s a reason why mob justice doesn’t work.
 
MODERATOR NOTICE

This thread is wandering. Please return to the topic of the original post.

Please post charitably
 
Culturally, we hide behind Jesus on the Cross and as Catholics, we seek Reconcilliation with our Lord. However, we often do not take the steps to make up our wrong doings that we inflicted on others. Yes, there are many circumstances where by our own will we cannot make up our wrong doings and need Jesus on the Cross to bear our sins. This does not excuse our need to reconcilliate with our brothers and sisters in Christ.

I know Jesus said that we should forgive those who wrong us 7X77 times. Shouldn’t the offender also be able to ask forgiveness 7X77 times and make penance (to God and those they have wronged) if they are truly contrite? Why should the victim do all work in repairing the situation.

Yes, I understand that Not forgiving will poison a persons soul. Culturally, we have become unable to make-up and spend our resources avoiding any responsibility for our actions. How can we become a culture who will become responsible , have integrity, and good will if we do not uphold penance to God and to the victims?

One part of the problem is that penance is only made in the form of jail or paying a fine. Here we have a person who did not have the means to make a monetary penance at the time he committed the crime. Now he does. The Christian thing to do would be to make a contrite gesture to make a penance to the victims. Yes, resigning may be satisfactory for some of the victims; seeing their abuser on TV must be distressing. It would be more satisfactory to see this man attempt to make penance to his accusers rather than hide behind Jesus on the Cross. We pray for the conversion of sinners. Is not making penance a big part of converting the sinner? What good is our faith if we do not experience the pain from our wrong doings; regardless of the excuses like age, poverty, ect we may use to avoid helping our brothers and sisters in Christ?
 
Anyone can believe whomwever they want, but there are two very important things a lot of folks are missing:
  1. Josh has seemed to have repented. That may not count for much among Christians (in which case, the shame is yours and such arrogance and pride could cost you–-not Josh— greatly on Judgement Day) regardless of whether or not one has been abused. We all have our crosses to bear, and it’s sickening to see people using their own personal situation or political cause to try and take away the freedom of others.
There is nothing new or special about their situation, either. I’ve seen the exact same psychology with 9-11 victims and victims of police shootings.

And doubting someone acting in good faith is a cheap shot to say the least. :slapfight: Between this thread, the Family Life Forum and the complaints I’ve received from other users, I know I won’t be referring anyone to this site for help anytime soon for spiritual or emotional needs.
  1. Jail time, punishment ect. are determined by the courts. I realize a lot of Americans these days are shunning “innocent until proven guilty” for their own selfish desires, but there’s a reason why mob justice doesn’t work.
There are some people replying to this thread who don’t seem to realize that sexual crimes, particularly ones of a prolonged, serial nature, are a lot different than other offenses. Despite a claim to the contrary earlier in the thread, sexual abusers have a high recidivism rate, particularly if they were also the victims of abuse and if they do not receive qualified, professional therapy. The fact that Josh repeatedly abused so many of his very young sisters over a long period of time would certainly lead one to believe that he may well have been the victim of abuse himself. The fact that he and his sisters didn’t receive any (or any qualified) counseling means this is a case of generational abuse just waiting to happen.

As far as receiving treatment, Jim Bob claimed he received counseling; Michelle claimed he didn’t. Based on their statements, I’m more inclined to believe Michelle. Josh can repent all he wants but that doesn’t address the underlying issues that led to him abusing his sisters. (And please try to keep in mind that four of his five victims were his much younger, flesh and blood sisters.) No amount of repenting can replace him receiving counseling from a legitimate, licenses therapist.

To put it in a different light, I used to work for a guy who was a certified Evangelical born again Christian minister. He was going to save the world single-handedly. His mission in life was to hire as many down on their luck ex-cons and degenerates as he could and shepherd them back to a life of productivity and prosperity. Every night at the end of their shifts he’d pull them into the back room where he’d pray with them and tell them to sin no more. The only problem with that is that it wasn’t therapy. He wasn’t addressing any of their problems and he was putting the rest of at risk. Garrick ended up back on heroin and back in jail. Ronnie started drinking again and died in the alley out back from alcohol poisoning. Carl, who quit seeing his actual therapist since was getting his Christian counseling, followed a customer home where he raped her and slit her throat. The three of them got all the mercy in the world. What they didn’t get was the professional help they actually needed. Sound a bit like Josh?

It’s true that jail time and punishment are decided by the courts, but you know what? That’s done to protect their victims and the rest of society who, frankly, need at least as much mercy and compassion as the offenders. And questioning whether Josh is acting in good faith isn’t uncharitable; it’s common sense. He may be acting in good faith or may not be. Honestly, it’s irrelevant because he never received any sort of genuine, professional counseling for his problem. Like I stated earlier in this thread, I’m not condoning crucifying the guy. He’s a fellow Christian and he deserves compassion. But at the same time, he has never received treatment for what he did. Nobody ever addressed his underlying problems. Therefore, it’s naive and irresponsible to assume that he’s never going to do it again (just as bad as assuming there weren’t other instances/victims). And it’s unfair, unkind and abusive to his sisters to force them to stay in close contact with him and not get them the counseling they need. Not only have they been victimized over and over, but without ensuring that they are mentally and emotionally sound, they’ve been left at risk of becoming abusers themselves. And, no, that’s not crazy talk or jumping to conclusions. Victims of child sexual abuse *are *more likely to become abusers themselves.

Bottom line is that it’s not uncharitable or un-Christian to turn someone in for child sexual abuse or to insist they need counseling. In fact, getting them and their victims the help they need is the most Christian thing you can do. Ignoring it and allowing it to continue and/or go unpunished and untreated is unconscionable.
 
Apparently no place for forgiveness either. :rolleyes:

He’s now 27. The question is whether he’s repented, sought forgiveness, and made restitution. It sounds like all of this was done. His family has moved on. Why can’t others?
One of the consequences of molesting, is people will always question your character. Being known to sneak in and molesting your sisters while they sleep doesn’t generate confidence in your capacity to perform Christian ministry and lobbying is a field where this kind of activity eviscerates it.

By the way I’d like to know how you make restitution to someone you have sexually assaulted? How does that work?
 
Wait. Am I understanding this article correctly, that he was 14 years old when he did this?

If so, I don’t see how it can be considered pedophilia, as he wasn’t an adult - not nearly.
He wasn’t of the age of consent himself. I’m not making excuses for him, but it isn’t like he was 25 years old.
There seems to be no evidence that he is, today, a pedophile.

Jon
Maybe not a pedophile (how old were the sisters at the time of the molestation, prepubescent?) but he is a incestuous molester, his daughters may be at risk later. And he wouldn’t be a pedophile if he diddled his 14 year old fully developed daughter later on, would he?
 
You really need to reread the report.

I’m not sure how that comment relates to the quote from the police report.
If you go to the next paragraph after she said he touched her. The officer asks her to point to the place where he touched her. She pointed to the picture of the “buttocks”. She said it was on the “outside.” The officer than asks “then how did it get to the skin.” The girl replied she didn’t know.

I thought that she was saying that he pulled the skirt down and she had pants on underneath.
After rereading it, it is possible that he pulled the pants down. But then she did say it was on the outside.

Anyway you dice it, he shouldn’t have touched them. I may have been mistaken when I said I thought he might have been overly scrupulous with a 13 year olds conscience. This was an opinion that I thought might have some merit. I never pretended that it was a quote.

The children seem to use private for both buttocks and breasts even though the officer tried to tell them that it meant vagina.

The person who called in the report is the only one who used the term vagina.

In the statement about the little girl and the book, Jim Bob said Josh touched the girl’s buttocks.

It seems that the children were confused about terminology. Could Josh been confused about terminology when he tried to explain to his parents what he did? He lived in a very isolated situation.

Regardless of what the caller who reported the incident said, what we really have to go on is what the children children pointed to which was their backside.

The sad thing is that, this was leaked to the media. The Duggar’s privacy was violated. The girls privacy as well as Josh’s.

It’s easy for us to be the Monday morning quarterbacks and condemn, because some people don’t agree with how it was handled.

The Duggars were originally put on t.v. because they had a large family and people were fascinated by how they ran their lives.

As a result of the speculation, it appears that the family’s show has been canceled.
 
They weren’t meant to. I wasn’t responding to you in this post.

I’m glad I have you as a progressive voice to instruct me.

Really? Preferring a rapist to an atheist is saying the exact opposite? I think we need some remedial reading lessons here.

You have yet to quote anything from said report. Might want to do so before accusing others of not having read it.
Went back and reread the report three times. The old Veteran’s hospital was stated, then building was in the next sentence. There was confusion about terminology. The girl said private then pointed to the picture of a buttocks. Another girl said private, then pointed a picture of buttocks. Another girl said private then pointed to the chest.

Please reread your post #537 where you stated that people would rather have their children marry a terrorist than atheist. You didn’t say rapist. These are obviously the reports you were incorrectly citing.

If I hurt your feelings, I am sorry. It was rather patronizing of me to remind you that not all Muslims are terrorists. I have a cousin who is married to a Muslim. He is nice guy, so this issue is a little sensitive to me.

I just feel sad for this whole family. I feel sad for the girls. I feel sad for Josh. I feel sad for the Duggars who I may be naive in thinking did what they thought was right.

Their show appears to be canceled.
 
Maybe not a pedophile (how old were the sisters at the time of the molestation, prepubescent?) but he is a incestuous molester, his daughters may be at risk later. And he wouldn’t be a pedophile if he diddled his 14 year old fully developed daughter later on, would he?
This is sick speculation.
 
This is sick speculation.
His was a sick activity don’t you think? If I was the mother of his children I would be worried about whether or not he was fit to be around my daughters. Perhaps you would have no qualms about your granddaughter being in the care of a man who sexually abused his sisters but I do.
 
Anyone can believe whomwever they want, but there are two very important things a lot of folks are missing:
  1. Josh has seemed to have repented. That may not count for much among Christians (in which case, the shame is yours and such arrogance and pride could cost you–-not Josh— greatly on Judgement Day) regardless of whether or not one has been abused. We all have our crosses to bear, and it’s sickening to see people using their own personal situation or political cause to try and take away the freedom of others.
There is nothing new or special about their situation, either. I’ve seen the exact same psychology with 9-11 victims and victims of police shootings.

And doubting someone acting in good faith is a cheap shot to say the least. :slapfight: Between this thread, the Family Life Forum and the complaints I’ve received from other users, **I know I won’t be referring anyone to this site for help anytime soon for spiritual or emotional needs. **
  1. Jail time, punishment ect. are determined by the courts. I realize a lot of Americans these days are shunning “innocent until proven guilty” for their own selfish desires, but there’s a reason why mob justice doesn’t work.
why would you refer someone to a discussion board for spiritual or emotion needs, you should refer them to priests or counselors not the internet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top