C
CHESTERTONRULES
Guest
Who are the elect?The elect will choose heaven.
Who are the elect?The elect will choose heaven.
Who can deny that the choice of a willing agent is limited and conditioned by its nature?Calvinism doesn’t deny free-will.
Ok, a great example. Now the question becomes: given everything he thinks, feel, needs, and his concerns (feel free to add other (name removed by moderator)uts), is his decision fixed? If it is, then his behavior is fixed by his circumstances (as his beliefs, but those again are determined by past beliefs and experiences, and so on back to his inital state when he was created).Consider this:
A man has lost his job. He is unemployed for weeks, his money is gone, his family is starving, there is no work, there is no help available. He knows where he can find food. He knows that as a Christian, or even as a Jew…the Commandment is “Thou shalt not steal”. He is a believer in God. Now…he has a decision: Feed his family or not.
Depending on who he is…he may or may not steal food to feed his family. He may beg or plead for the food. He may offer to work for the food. But that is his decision. He will make that decision based on what he thinks, feels, needs, and his concerns.
A man breaks into a house, he murders two children in their beds with a knife, the father hears noise, he gets a gun out of his nightstand…he goes to check on the children, enters the room, sees the children dead, sees the murderer holding the knife dripping with blood. He has his loaded pistol. What does he do?
As a Christian or Jew, he knows the Commandment “Thou shalt not murder”… he also knows that “Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord”…but on an earthly level…he knows that he can kill the intruder who has murdered his children, and there is little likelihood that he will be charged for anything, and even if he was, it would be extremely difficult to find the jury to convict him.
Again, a good example, but I turn the the same thing. Add up everything…his emotion, his reason, his beliefs, his senses. Do all of those determine his action? If not, we’ve accounted for everything that would have some influence over the decision, so it must be arbitrary: he could not have known the decision he would have made beforehand, nor account for it afterwards. His life is a series of impulses over which he has no control.What does he do? He does exactly what he thinks is appropriate…because God gave him the ability to reason and make decisions. He can inject all the emotion he wants into the decision, or he can reject it, or he can combine bloodlust for vengeance with reason and still kill the murderer. Or he can subdue him with the gun, wounding him or whatever and let the courts decide. Either way…its his decision.
You’re moving the goalposts.You still haven’t expressed anything about the OP that is inaccurate.
My purpose is to discredit Calvinism, so on this we agree.
I think it is a dangerous heresy and it has hurt someone very close to me.
I post the cold hard truth about Calvinism so others can see the dangers.
If you can’t tell me how my post is inaccurate, then I’ll assume that it is accurate but that you don’t like the truth to be so boldly stated.
I’ll welcome any constructive criticisms if any are offered.
[SIGN]AMEN!![/SIGN]Who can deny that the choice of a willing agent is limited and conditioned by its nature?
Can a dog choose to be a duck or a cat a bird?
Can a sinner, born in sin and at enmity with God, choose to believe without his heart first being changed?
Those chosen by the Father, in Christ, before the foundation of the world, to be His churchWho are the elect?
Okay, this is just inaccurate.Calvinists, like all evangelicals, believe that salvation comes by accepting a Person; while Catholicism teaches one must accept dogma to be saved.
Bill Jackson, cecmotc@juno.com
Cute… but while the exact words are not present…the interpretation of the statement amounts to exactly that. I guess you speak a different English than the rest of us…I searched the words “zero choice” and they don’t appear anywhere in the text you’ve linked.
Can you explain their absence?
Not sure who you are agreeing with, but I know its not me.I agree, if God doesn’t predestine, no one would be saved.
I don’t think you understand the subject or possibly even the word “predestination”… here’s a bit of it that denies your viewpoint and opinion.Catholic predestination teaches the same thing: predestination is free of every merit.
Really…but Without special revelation no one can know with certainty that he belongs to the number of the elect…The elect will choose heaven.
Those chosen before the foundations of the world. Only God knows who are the elect with complete knowledge.Who are the elect?
You are attempting make this more difficult than it is. I’m not sure if you have ever studied psychology, but if you have, you would be aware of the rules of Maslow’s Hierarchy, and how things come into play. I guess what I should just simply say… the man who’s family is starving is going to make a decision. He is either going to steal the food, breaking the Commandment, or he is going to let his family starve while obeying the Commandment. No matter how you paint it, color it, or spin it, he is going to make the decision, for better or worse, he is going to make it. But each and every man will make that decision based on his own parameters. Not predestination.Ok, a great example. Now the question becomes: given everything he thinks, feel, needs, and his concerns (feel free to add other (name removed by moderator)uts), is his decision fixed? If it is, then his behavior is fixed by his circumstances (as his beliefs, but those again are determined by past beliefs and experiences, and so on back to his inital state when he was created).
If his decision is not fixed, then his decision must be arbitrary, for all of the (name removed by moderator)uts which affect his decision have already been accounted for.
Possibly, but there are some variables that are uncounted for, or rather possibilities. One might react one way, another might react the opposite, one might do half of each (shoot but not kill), whereas one might decide to kill, then change his mind, then say “oh what the heck”…and do it.Again, a good example, but I turn the the same thing. Add up everything…his emotion, his reason, his beliefs, his senses. Do all of those determine his action? If not, we’ve accounted for everything that would have some influence over the decision, so it must be arbitrary: he could not have known the decision he would have made beforehand, nor account for it afterwards. His life is a series of impulses over which he has no control.
So, then we are right back where we started… You have no say in the matter. You can live and do as you please…cuz you may or may not be one of the elect. Shaaaaazzzzaammmmmmm!!Those chosen before the foundations of the world. Only God knows who are the elect with complete knowledge.
Each man is going to take an action. That we can be sure of (even if that action is to curl up in a ball and do nothing at all).You are attempting make this more difficult than it is. I’m not sure if you have ever studied psychology, but if you have, you would be aware of the rules of Maslow’s Hierarchy, and how things come into play. I guess what I should just simply say… the man who’s family is starving is going to make a decision. He is either going to steal the food, breaking the Commandment, or he is going to let his family starve while obeying the Commandment. No matter how you paint it, color it, or spin it, he is going to make the decision, for better or worse, he is going to make it. But each and every man will make that decision based on his own parameters. Not predestination.
Possibly, but there are some variables that are uncounted for, or rather possibilities. One might react one way, another might react the opposite, one might do half of each (shoot but not kill), whereas one might decide to kill, then change his mind, then say “oh what the heck”…and do it.
I never meant to imply that two different people might not do the same thing in the same situation. My point was that I was including the individual person’s state (including personality) in the equation. My point was, what happens when you throw every factor that you think I might’ve forgotten into the equation? Given enough state, internal as well as external, is the outcome determined?Simply put…no matter how complicated we try to make it, God made us, each and every one of us with this nifty little thing called “Free Will”. He turned us loose on His world and lets us decide what we want to do…whether good, bad, in between, indifferent… or whatever. We are even able to change our minds about lots of things, make 180’s in life good to bad, bad to good.
I think you are not considering the Scriptures. The words “elect” and “chosen” are biblical words and therefore, doctrine in the Scriptures.So, then we are right back where we started… You have no say in the matter. You can live and do as you please…cuz you may or may not be one of the elect. Shaaaaazzzzaammmmmmm!!
Concerning the one point I made concerning Catholic predestination (it’s not on the basis of “foreseen merit”), yes.So, tell me…do you really think we believe what you do?
Thanks; the exact words were not present.… but while the exact words are not present…
If I understand you correctly as to what “the choice of a willing agent” is… I can deny that the agent is limited and conditioned by its nature. Everyday life is denial of that concept. I have this notion that you are trying valiantly to make this very “esoteric”. Its not.Who can deny that the choice of a willing agent is limited and conditioned by its nature?
Not relevant. Bad contrast. Invalid. A leopard cannot change his spots either. Neither can a man or a woman change sexes 100%, or at all at the flip of a switch. But, more important to the subject, critters are not humans, therefore…you are not dealing with the same thingCan a dog choose to be a duck or a cat a bird?
Why not? Do you mean to infer that one must go through one of these heart wrenching tear jerking you gonna die in hell fire and damnation sermons in a tent with some guy screaming at you kind of epiphany sorta thingy and be scared out of your wits before you can decide to believe in God?Can a sinner, born in sin and at enmity with God, choose to believe without his heart first being changed?
But still the fact remains…we do not believe what you believe. Did you bother to read the information?Concerning the one point I made concerning Catholic predestination (it’s not on the basis of “foreseen merit”), yes.
And yet a literal interpretation of the what I posted says precisely what I said.Thanks; the exact words were not present.
I know; pity for you.But still the fact remains…we do not believe what you believe.
Yes.Did you bother to read the information?
Don’t think so.And yet a literal interpretation of the what I posted says precisely what I said.
… but while the exact words are not present…
Those chosen by the Father, in Christ, before the foundation of the world, to be His church
(Eph 1:3ff).