R
RobHom
Guest
I know; pity for you.
Yes.
Don’t think so.
- Pity neither desired or necessary.

- Somehow I doubt that, or you didn’t understand it.

- Not my fault.

I know; pity for you.
Yes.
Don’t think so.
I really don’t have a dog in this fight but it annoys me no end when someone tells others what they believe and then persists in telling them what they believe even when they tell him they do not.
Lets say for the fun of it…and since you don’t have a dog in this fight, how does that work. I pulled what I have posted off of a Calvinist site, and posted the source and C & P’d the info…and its clear to read what it says…so how can they deny what they are supposed to believe when its right there in black and white?CR has drawn conclusions from a faulty understanding of Calvinism and now would have all Calvinists admit to them.
As with Catholic Predestination.You are chosen before the foundation of the world.
As with Catholic Predestination.You may be chosen to reside in heaven.
As with Catholic Predestination.You may be chosen to reside in hell.
Not true.You have no choice in the matter.
As with Catholic Predestination.Its already been decided.
As with Catholic Predestination.Predestination has determined that nothing you can or will do makes a lick of difference.
As with Catholic Predestination.You can dress up a pig…
Just answer the question.You’re moving the goalposts.
Just a moment ago the question was what constituted an inaccuracy or distortion, now it’s just inaccuracy.
But here you go: distortion IS inaccuracy and all the more evil for your stated intent.
Here’s the big difference in Catholicism:As with Catholic Predestination.
As with Catholic Predestination.
As with Catholic Predestination.
Not true.
As with Catholic Predestination.
As with Catholic Predestination.
As with Catholic Predestination.
Of course not.
We don’t believe the same thing concerning justification; however, I’m talking about predestination, not justification.Here’s the big difference in Catholicism:
1996 Our justification comes from the grace of God. Grace is favor, the free and undeserved help that God gives us to respond to his call to become children of God, adoptive sons, partakers of the divine nature and of eternal life.46
CHESTERTONRULES said:2002 God’s free initiative demands man’s free response, for God has created man in his image by conferring on him, along with freedom, the power to know him and love him. The soul only enters freely into the communion of love. God immediately touches and directly moves the heart of man. He has placed in man a longing for truth and goodness that only he can satisfy. The promises of “eternal life” respond, beyond all hope, to this desire:
Calvinists teach that man is unable to respond.We don’t believe the same thing concerning justification; however, I’m talking about predestination, not justification.
Men must freely respond.
So does the Scripture, and your church.Calvinists teach that man is unable to respond.
That’s what the Scripture says as well—God regenerates, or causes the reprobate, who is dead in sins and trespasses, to be “born-again” (Eph 2:1ff; Col 2:13, 1 Pet 1:3).Since Calvinists believe man is incapable of responding to God’s offer of salvation, they presume that God enlightens only those who are elect with a supernatural understanding that is withheld from the non-elect. Without this illumination, or infusion of understanding, which God gives or withholds according to His choice, man cannot respond to God.
That is not what scripture teaches, nor is it what the Catholic Church teaches:So does the Scripture, and your church.
I believe it was Pelagian who said men could respond.
That’s what the Scripture says as well—God regenerates, or causes the reprobate, who is dead in sins and trespasses, to be “born-again” (Eph 2:1ff; Col 2:13, 1 Pet 1:3).
And Christ, Himself, says that ”no one is able to come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him…” (Jn 6:44).
That’s what the Scriptures, Calvin, and your church teach: man cannot respond to God, apart from God’s grace.That is not what scripture teaches, nor is it what the Catholic Church teaches
The difference is that you believe that God withholds his grace from some men.That’s what the Scriptures, Calvin, and your church teach: man cannot respond to God, apart from God’s grace.![]()
That is what the Bible teaches.The difference is that you believe that God withholds his grace from some men.
That’s not what the bible teaches nor is it what the Catholic Church teaches
Those verses don’t change the fact that the bible says Jesus will draw all people to himself and that Jesus died for the whole world.That is what the Bible teaches.
Mt 1:21 says "…you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins."
Jesus Himself says, "no one is able to come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him…"
It’s not difficult to conclude that those who are eternally damned are neither given to the Son by the Father, nor does He draw them to the Son (cf Jn 6:39).
Thomism is acceptable to hold as a Catholic.While I am not a Calvinist, I would suggest that what Thomas Aquinas says about predestination in Summa Theologica is quite interesting. It can be found in Part 1, Question 23. Article 3 is notable in that it deals with whether God reprobates anyone.
ccel.org/ccel/aquinas/summa.FP.ii.FP_Q23.html
Define “all.”Those verses don’t change the fact that the bible says Jesus will draw all people to himself and that Jesus died for the whole world.
I agree with these verses.
When Jesus talks of his people, he is referring to his sheep who hear his voice AND follow his will.
God draws all men to Jesus, but some refuse to believe.
In John 17 Jesus is praying for his disciples when he refers to those given to him by the father.Define “all.”
Clearly in Jn 17, Jesus doesn’t pray for everyone, but only those given to Him by the Father, and those who, in the future, will hear the words of the apostles, and believe.