F
friardchips
Guest
Nothing snobby about it.We must regretfully report mission failure.
A simple way to reason whether an expression can be objectively good or bad would be to take a simple example and follow the rule through.
…Can something be lacking in reverence?
If a person wore shorts and t-shirt to Church every Sunday and on the t-shirt had famous celebrities printed on it, with “I love money” scrawled all over, it could be sensibly deduced that such donned attire is not suitable (there could be more extreme examples we could use, if necessary, if this example is questioned as satisfactory).
Is this person culpable?
If the person doesn’t know better, then no. But the responsibility for that person’s education would then fall onto those around them, who do.
If the people around that person do not know better, then it would be the responsibility of others in the wider community to point this out.
There is such a thing as ignorance, which can (possibly) almost completely rid a person of personal culpability.
There is too, such a thing as culpable ignorance, which brings into the argument the fact that there are plenty of opportunities for people to learn between what is good and what is not.