The Insidious Creeping of the Gay Movement

  • Thread starter Thread starter SILVERNAME
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok I’ll bite, What persicution?
It’s likely you don’t consider the predatory nature of homosexual activists upon schoolchildren to be persecution at all.

Many of us do.

They are literally shoving their sinful agenda down the throats of kids who are, at best, vulnerable and confused at that age. By constantly bombarding the culture with the false notion that homosexuality is cool, they are subverting as many children as possible to their nefarious ends.
 
It’s likely you don’t consider the predatory nature of homosexual activists upon schoolchildren to be persecution at all.
Um what?
Many of us do.
They are literally shoving their sinful agenda down the throats of kids who are, at best, vulnerable and confused at that age. By constantly bombarding the culture with the false notion that homosexuality is cool, they are subverting as many children as possible to their nefarious ends.
So they are trying to turn school children gay?
 
Got it in one.
:rotfl:

That would have to be without a doubt the dumbest agenda that they could have.

Aside from such an agenda bringing an end to our species by not breeding, you cant actually make someone gay no matter how much propoganda you throw at them.

What are they thinking, I mean they of all people should know that “gay” is not contagous or forced on anyone. They know it isnt a choice (they always say that they didnt choose to be gay) and it isnt something that can be influenced. It is an agenda that has no chance of success at all.

But then again they do already know this, so perhaps it isnt their agenda at all. Perhaps their agenda is to be treated better than they are now and spread tollerance by education. Maybe they want people to understand that homosexuals are human beings like the rest of us and that there is nothing wrong with being homosexual (plus it could also help those struggling with their homosexuality come to terms with who they are and accept it). Maybe this is just an over exaggeration of their agenda or part of some scare campaign to stomp them down.

But then again, maybe that is what they want us to believe and they are trying to distract us from their plans of world domination.
 
:rotfl:

That would have to be without a doubt the dumbest agenda that they could have.

Aside from such an agenda bringing an end to our species by not breeding, you cant actually make someone gay no matter how much propoganda you throw at them.

What are they thinking, I mean they of all people should know that “gay” is not contagous or forced on anyone. They know it isnt a choice (they always say that they didnt choose to be gay) and it isnt something that can be influenced. It is an agenda that has no chance of success at all.

But then again they do already know this, so perhaps it isnt their agenda at all. Perhaps their agenda is to be treated better than they are now and spread tollerance by education. Maybe they want people to understand that homosexuals are human beings like the rest of us and that there is nothing wrong with being homosexual (plus it could also help those struggling with their homosexuality come to terms with who they are and accept it). Maybe this is just an over exaggeration of their agenda or part of some scare campaign to stomp them down.

But then again, maybe that is what they want us to believe and they are trying to distract us from their plans of world domination.
And Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

As part of the forces of darkness attempting to destroy civilization, homosexual activists (whether they are useful idiots or top strategists) rely on people like you not taking their agenda seriously.

It is normal people who are under attack, but thank God some of us have awakened to the threat and are ready to fight back.
 
And Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

As part of the forces of darkness attempting to destroy civilization, homosexual activists (whether they are useful idiots or top strategists) rely on people like you not taking their agenda seriously.
But I do take their agenda seriously, I think that they should have equal rights and they should have tollerance from others.

Its these suggestions of world domination by making our children gay and this talk of the “forces of darkness” that I cant take seriously.
It is normal people who are under attack, but thank God some of us have awakened to the threat and are ready to fight back.
How are normal people under attack, be specific.

It doesnt sound like you have awakened at all, all these vague accusations sound like you are still dreaming.
 
But I do take their agenda seriously, I think that they should have equal rights and they should have tollerance from others.

Its these suggestions of world domination by making our children gay and this talk of the “forces of darkness” that I cant take seriously.

How are normal people under attack, be specific.

It doesnt sound like you have awakened at all, all these vague accusations sound like you are still dreaming.
Do you equate tolerance with acceptance?
 
To a certain extent, I guess that I do.

But what do you mean exactly by your question?
I guess what I am trying to figure out or understand better is your comment they should have tollerance from others.
So in that context what does “tolerance” mean to you?
 
I guess what I am trying to figure out or understand better is your comment they should have tollerance from others.
So in that context what does “tolerance” mean to you?
Well what do you think that means?

Treat them like human beings, dont exclude them simply for being gay, dont single them out simply for being gay.

I know that there is more to your question than you are saying, so I cant fully respond until you show what that “more” is.
 
Do you equate tolerance with acceptance?
To a certain extent, I guess that I do.

But what do you mean exactly by your question?
Well what do you think that means?

Treat them like human beings, dont exclude them simply for being gay, dont single them out simply for being gay.

I know that there is more to your question than you are saying, so I cant fully respond until you show what that “more” is. Not really. I think you about summed it up for me.
I think that the use of the word “tolerate” in regards to homosexuals is a bit misleading. While I tolerate the person, I do not tolerate the acts that some homosexuals engage in…and I think when people use the word tolerate they really want us to tolerate the acts as well.🤷
 
I think that the use of the word “tolerate” in regards to homosexuals is a bit misleading. While I tolerate the person, I do not tolerate the acts that some homosexuals engage in…and I think when people use the word tolerate they really want us to tolerate the acts as well.🤷
So there was more to it.

I was talking about the people, not the acts. However two conscenting adults choose to be intimate in the privacy of their own home is between them and God, its none of my business.

No its about the treatment that they recieve just for being gay.
 
So there was more to it.
Not really. Just wanted clarification on what you meant by tolerate.
I was talking about the people, not the acts.
Then I totally agree. But sadly I think when the word tolerate is used in connection with homosexuals in most cases it includes the acts (that should be tolerated).
However two conscenting adults choose to be intimate in the privacy of their own home is between them and God, its none of my business.
Well can you tell the folks at FOLSOM to keep it off the PUBLIC streets!😃
 
Well what do you think that means?

Treat them like human beings, dont exclude them simply for being gay, dont single them out simply for being gay.

I know that there is more to your question than you are saying, so I cant fully respond until you show what that “more” is.
I’m curious as to why you are so pro-homosexual.

Are you also pro-Christian?
 
However two conscenting adults choose to be intimate in the privacy of their own home is between them and God, its none of my business.
What about 3 consenting adults? Or 7 consenting adults? How about 4 consenting adults, a duck and a doberman?

How about a consenting set of identical twin sisters? What about two consenting adults that plan on exchanging cash after their ‘transaction’?

We ARE our brothers keepers.
 
What about 3 consenting adults? Or 7 consenting adults? How about 4 consenting adults, a duck and a doberman?

How about a consenting set of identical twin sisters? What about two consenting adults that plan on exchanging cash after their ‘transaction’?

We ARE our brothers keepers.
Precisely.

When people do those things, they MAKE it our businesses.
 
I’m curious as to why you are so pro-homosexual.

Are you also pro-Christian?
There is no difference between the two. You can be a good Catholic or Christian and still have a same-gender partner and be in good standing. There is no conflict when you look at the entire person.
 
What about 3 consenting adults? Or 7 consenting adults? How about 4 consenting adults, a duck and a doberman?

How about a consenting set of identical twin sisters? What about two consenting adults that plan on exchanging cash after their ‘transaction’?

We ARE our brothers keepers.
Irrelevant extrapolation. The discussion is about treating people who have and lovingly act on their same-gender preferences, which should be with loving personal respect towards them. They are no lesser people because of their sexual preference.
 
There is no difference between the two. You can be a good Catholic or Christian and still have a same-gender partner and be in good standing. There is no conflict when you look at the entire person.
Sorry, but how can you be a good Catholic and have a same-gender partner?

The two do not go hand in hand esp. in light of the churches stance on homosexual acts/marriage etc.
 
Sorry, but how can you be a good Catholic and have a same-gender partner?

The two do not go hand in hand esp. in light of the churches stance on homosexual acts/marriage etc.
Yes. Please read the Catechism before you say such things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top