The Missing Link has Been Found how will this change morality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TruthisBeauty7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why all the yelling? There are many strange things in life, my friend. Best not to stake your faith in any way on things that your own predictions of what is or is not out there.

Behold, a two-headed kitten. There many more two-headed animals where that cute li’l guy came from (Google image search).
I don’t get you!!! Yelling??? I’m a computer. And I don’t yell. But I’m passionate for the Love of my Life Jesus Christ. He is my all in all I love Him so Much. I don’t believe in evolution or missing links. I do however believ it’s time to go to bed. God Bless. I love you through Jesus, but I still don’t get you? I know their is two headed animals that is what I said the missing link was, a freak of nature no a missing link. Reread my post. And Be nice!!

Oh I see why you took me wrong. Mybad!!! I met havn’t you ever seen a deformed animal. That is what the missing link is. If anyone believes in a missing link I have a pet Bigfoot living in my back yard, along with E.T. They are out at the moment making crop circles. I Passionate for Jesus I don’t CARE about missing links. LOL Good Night
 
I don’t know enough about all the animals in the world to know of this fossil had a birth defect.

Do you?
Yes! Yes I do as a Matter of Fact. But I will not defend myself. I’ll let God do that. Night
 
It’s all a farse!!! God spoke it and it came to pass!!! That is no missing link!!! It had a birth defect!!! Have you ever seen a deformed animal?
A birth defect? :rotfl:

That’s a new one.

Riddle me this: Is it still a “defect” even if it increases the Darwinian Fitness of the individual?
 
I met havn’t you ever seen a deformed animal. That is what the missing link is
As a matter of fact, when I logged on this afternoon, the news page had a link to a calf born with 7 legs and 8 hooves–but only one spine and head. The poor creature died 10 minutes after birth.

If you’re talking about Ida, no paleontologist has said that Ida is a missing link.

Of course, the popular media have not been so reserved, but just like I don’t excpect to hear good theology from the media, I don’t expect good science, either.
 
None, wasn’t Ida actually found 25 years ago…they are just bringing her out of storage now?
Yup, this fossil just has been unveiled to the public.

They must need a new photo for school textbooks.

I don’t see how this is a missing link to anything. There are always new living species being discovered today on land and in the sea. At the same time species go extinct. What is so spectacular about a fossil of an extinct mammal that it can be called a missing link?
 
Since we now can better prove Macro Evolution is true, what effect do you think this will have on homosapien Morality?
I have no problem with evolution, but this desparate attempt to create a news story is a joke.

A missing link between a lemur and a monkey?

What?
 
Yup, this fossil just has been unveiled to the public.

They must need a new photo for school textbooks.

I don’t see how this is a missing link to anything. There are always new living species being discovered today on land and in the sea. At the same time species go extinct. What is so spectacular about a fossil of an extinct mammal that it can be called a missing link?
It is indeed a transitional fossil. At a quick glance it looks almost like a muskrat yet it has transitional traits found only in primates such as nails in the stead of claws, hair in the stead of fur, etc.
 
Since we now can better prove Macro Evolution is true, what effect do you think this will have on homosapien Morality?
After reading this thread I thought I would reply to your post in the same way I witness to non Christians. Here are several reasons why science has not even set foot on the path to life or explaining its origin.
DNA and RNA, scientist know what a DNA string is what it is made of and have even cracked the binary code. What they cant do is create a single strand of DNA from scratch, but they will tell you it just happened all by itself. In the search to construct DNA in the lab science has found that the medium that holds the most promise to construct DNA in from scratch is types of clay. Hmmmm go figure that in Gen it says that God created Adam from the dust of the earth, hmmmm nothing new learned here if your a scripture / bible believer.

Even if scientist could construct all the components of a one celled “simple” life form, hehehe simple thats an understatement. I would not hold my breath that the key to life has been unraveled, and here is why. Scientist for years have had all the parts to reconstruct a single cell. Here is how it goes, scientist place a cell in a solution that is the same as the fluid inside the cell itself, then they take a needle and punch a hole in the cell wall draining all the little “simple” parts out of the cell into the solution. Wal la there you have all the parts including the DNA already made, the problem is they can never put humpty dumpty back together again. So what will it prove to be able to construct all the components if you cant take the pre made ones and make them work?

As I mentioned above God created Adam from the dust of the earth and science is hot on the trail to constructing DNA from scratch “in clay” I can save them some trouble by simply reading the rest of the verse in Gen. And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.
I dont know where they are going to get a phaser that shoots life into nonliving compounds but lets just say for sake of discussion they did and managed to get a single cell to live. Mathematicians will tell you the chance of all the compounds including the DNA string coming together by chance is like zero in 14 billion years. Again you still have the problem of making it alive …remember humpty dumpty?

I’ll end by saying after you have a simple single cell living the next problem is it evolving into a higher life form. Higher life forms are more complex, that means a lot longer DNA string, “more carefully constructed, error correcting code that contains all the information for the construction of every cell and organ in a human body”. The mutations or differences observed in life forms from generation to generation today is ALWAYS I repeat ALWAYS because of lost or more correctly stated damaged DNA. Science can not produce one case of mutation that shows more information has been added to the DNA. So its just as I thought, we are not getting better, we are winding down just like the universe, our DNA from Adam to us is in a state of decline, no new information.

So until scientist can mix some compounds in a test tube, shake it up and out crawls a living, one cell, asexual reproducing creature I place Darwin’s theory next to Humpty Dumpty, 😉
 
It’s all a farse!!! God spoke it and it came to pass!!! That is no missing link!!! It had a birth defect!!! Have you ever seen a deformed animal?
It doesn’t look as though the Catholics are going to give you break.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=5238598&postcount=7
Lets just say that they may also need to accept the bible as Gods word same as the scientist need to. It would certainly save a lot of useless guess work, and tax payer money.

God bless you, and be confident in this.
Philippians 1:6 being confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Jesus Christ;
 
Well Said. I think its our duty to utterly crush and destory the theory of Macro Evolution , before this poison spreads.
 
Somebody get this guy a time machine back to the Scopes monkey trial!

Wait…you’d need SCIENCE for that! Dang! 😃
 
No kidding, Obviously I mean it being accepted in Christian circles. There is no evidence for this theory and I believe it comes from Satan himself.
 
Well Said. I think its our duty to utterly crush and destory the theory of Macro Evolution , before this poison spreads.
I have to say, you really do reinforce the stereotype that religious people deny truth for comfort. What makes you a rarity is that you blatantly describe your process of denial for all to see. Hmm…sounds an awful lot like a troll seeking to accentuate that stereotype. I’m not saying you are a troll, but looking like one doesn’t help your case.
 
It’s all a farse!!! God spoke it and it came to pass!!!
While computers have no emotions, the people behind them do. It takes human fingers to type extra exclamation points. Since they serve no grammatical purpose, they have the appearance of conveyance of an outburst.

This fossil neither proves or disproves a thing. It is just another piece of evidence. There hasn’t even been time for this evidence to be vetted. Remember Piltdown man? The fossil was in 1912 and proved a hoax in 1953.

In any case, no one doubts that God spoke and it came to pass. No one here will argue that. No one doubts that God was capable of creating the world in any fashion, using any method he so desired. These are matters of faith. The question of how God created everything is a matter of science.
 
And what IF macroevolution turns out to be the mechanism God used to create different species?

How does this destroy faith and morality?
 
And what IF macroevolution turns out to be the mechanism God used to create different species?

How does this destroy faith and morality?
This is precisely what I (and others) have been asking TruthisBeauty7 on all four of her recent evolution threads. We’re still awaiting an answer.
 
First off Im a He, and Ive clearly stated my point with various Reasons and explanations.
 
Im kidding ,

Seriously …what effect will this have on people’s faith and morality please discuss
Why would it affect our morality? The bible tells us that God made us … it doesn’t say how. We could have evolved, what’s so hard to fathom?

How do you think this discovery should affect us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top