That isn’t his call anyway.Top infectious disease expert won’t rule out temporary national lockdown
That isn’t his call anyway.Top infectious disease expert won’t rule out temporary national lockdown
Dr. Fauci actually states that.That isn’t his call anyway.
Don’t see any purpose in a national lockdown.Top infectious disease expert won’t rule out temporary national lockdown
Our schools are closed this week for spring break and the district has added a second week due to the virus. They are using this two week timeframe to thoroughly clean and disinfect the schools. I think it’s a great idea even though I acknowledge the hardship on working parents. Since colds and flu run rampant at this time anyway, knowing the kids will be going back to thoroughly disinfected classrooms should help diminish all the illnesses. Closing schools is basic protocol in a pandemic…and this IS a pandemic!Most states just need to do the basics (hygiene & distancing), they don’t have to close their schools and make the parents stay home.
How do you know this?While increased testing is making the numbers jump, we have definitely flattened the infection curve.
I’m stating the obvious. We are largely practicing social distancing and increasing hygiene. Many many people are working from home. Yes, it will continue to spread but the rate of infection will drop.How do you know this?
While that’s definitely what we are doing here, we didn’t see a huge spike at the start.A national lockdown would just punish every small business, without benefit health-wise. Most states just need to do the basics (hygiene & distancing), they don’t have to close their schools and make the parents stay home.
The data seems to support me.I hope you are correct. Certainly it must help some, but if it is an exponential spread, it us not obvious to me that it is yet significant. I thought maybe you had some data to support it.
I pray you are right. The countries that seemed to be successful, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan, had a more broad strategy than we have yet implemented.
No, I suspect you just don’t know the history.You overstate, by far, any similiaritues in testing problems between Korea and us.
I am not sure this is what you are referring to, but the lack of excess capacity in our healthcare system is a real concern. We have fewer beds per capita than most developed nations, including Italy and Korea. And most of our beds are occupied on any given day. If the pandemic requires hundreds of thousands of beds, our healthcare system will be in a serious crisis.While Japan and Italy have some largest population of older adults, who has more medically assisted than USA?
You ignored what I said.No, I know the history. We are not a fraction as far into testing as South Korea was at this same time relative to the disease hitting their country.
Well, that’s a couple months too late. Regardless of the history, your original claim:The US is making the same regulation changes this pandemic.
With regards to this pandemic is just wrong. I guess from your perspective, all is hunky-dory if we have effective testing the next time there is a pandemic.Incidentally, we are ramping up our testing the same way Korea did, by partnering with private testing services.
I’m not sure what you mean by test kits. There are no quick tests for the virus. Labs that do the testing now are still in the ramp up phase and there may very well be reagent shortages as the tests are so new. The companies providing the reagents are ramping up as well. I haven’t heard that any labs are unable to test the specimens they are getting…meaning they are running short of reagents. If so, I’d love a link.There just arent enough test kits to go around at the moment.