The Problem of DARWIN'S EVIL

[PickyPicky]

why is there no sign of another woman’s off spring on the planet?

I hope you know that a woman who has no children, or who has no daughters but only sons, does not pass on her mitochondrial dna beyond the next generation.

 

[STT]

This is a common misunderstanding. It is not about the survival of the individual, but about their DNA. A wimp with four children who dies age 30 is “fitter” than a big strong hulk with no children who lives until 60. The wimp has passed on more DNA to future generations than the hulk.

Remember: “If your parents didn’t have any children, then the chances are you won’t have any either.”

rossum

Thanks for making things more clearer.

 

[mVitus]

No The reason you see Catholics denounce evolution is because it is a lie being sold to the world that we are in charge of shedding light onto. Not because of any fear.

Then please explain why the Church has not denounced evolution. Bonus points if you can do so without denouncing the Church as heretical and overcome by the gates of hell.

but when a pseudo based science guided by men who hate God direct it towards vulnerable people at an early age and tell them to swallow hard this fat lie and never question truth or facts about it then I will step in and lead those lost sheep back to Christ if they are willing to hear reason and seek the truth.

The irony if that statement is that so often it’s people with your position that drive people away. Evolution has a large body of proof so when people are wrongly told “God or evolution. Choose.” they are pushed away from God because they have been told a falsehood. Christianity as a whole has more to fear from those that obligate others to follow theur literalistic view of Genesis than it does of those who are able to synthesize our knowledge of the world with our knowledge of theology.

 

[MikeInVA]

My issue with some posters is that they are flat our rejecting theistic evolution without any clear evidence to indicate that creation is static.

Where is the clear evidence that supports “theistic evolution”?

 

[Cruciferi]

I believe in the Big Bang. I don’t believe life originated from a primordial pool. In my opinion, creating the Universe and creating life are two separate actions.

It’s quite possible that life is transported and planted on Earth. Elijah and Enoch are proof that it’s possible. This could explain why life rebounds quickly after Mass Extinction Events.

 

[sevenswords]

I am a Biblical prophet, aren’t you?
I.d love to introduce you to Catholicism sometimes as it is full of Biblical prophets and you could learn so much about linguistics and how Atheistic masons would come and apply social engineering on us to develop a people who could not listen to the truth but would attack the truth teller with slurs and insults.
have you a contribution to make or just popping in to try and silence me?

 

[theCardinalbird]

Where is the clear evidence that supports “theistic evolution”?

All I was asking if there was clear evidence for creation being static. I didn’t say there was clear evidence for theistic evolution as theism doesn’t have material proof.

Also dodging the question isn’t good either (but that’s assuming you were trying to dodge the question )

 

[IWantGod]

I believe in the Big Bang. I don’t believe life originated from a primordial pool.

When you say life, do you mean biological processes? Or do you mean life in the sense that God is required for those processes to be a possibility, to become animated?

You see, I’m with you if you think that the very processes of life only makes intelligible sense in terms of goal directed behavior, insomuch as it is impossible to interpret an organisms behavior in any other way. I think intelligent information is required for that process. The best argument i have heard is that it’s just an illusion, but that’s not an argument without a credible example to the contrary.

Or do you mean that life requires a being who directly constructs the first organism in order for life to get going? If so why does that view appeal to you? Is it really necessary?

What’s wrong with the primordial pool idea?

 

[sevenswords]

The Church has not denounced that I have red socks on my washing line and why would it?
It neither has made it dogma or entered any kind of opinion other than science should be listened too.

Sounds like you like to dabble in a little judging there… maybe you should read the bible and not a free mason manifesto.
Or do you not know your origins of the Evolution dogma?
Do you not know who was behind it and do you not know the fruits of it?
Evolution has nothing to do with Catholicism do you understand that?
what i want to know is why don’t you
throw out all the books of the bible as I’m sure God didn’t mean for us to believe in a flood or a sea parted it’s waves or a man called Jesus divided 2 loaves and 5 fish into a multitude etc etc where do you stop at literal and poetry?
Where is the line and who determines it.
There is no proof for evolution as it is not real and goes against known laws.

 

[PickyPicky]

jeepers you’d really stoop[ that low to defend a lie really? No daughters eh there’s a theory I could spend time on.

First, don’t be offensive.

Second, have you not heard that women sometimes fail to produce daughters? In those circumstances their mitochondrial dna does not descend further than their sons. That’s simple enough to understand, surely.

 

[sevenswords]

What are you talking about?
Elijah and Enoch are proof of what and mass extension!, have you been at the conspiracy theories in the wacky world of you tube?

 

[sevenswords]

So How many woman in this mystical society did not produce girls?
according to your theory Eve was one woman on the earth, how many more do you think there was in the whole world? and they all did not produce girls, for how long did they not produce girls? stretching a bit there and don’t tell me not to be offensive when you try to get me to swallow that and call yourself reasonable.Or is the tactics about to change now? are you going to leave now and blame it on my personal attacks on you or the normal start a character assassination?

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

You’re starting to veer into rants. Calm down.

 

[sevenswords]

sorry not accepting random statements today I’ve had a belly full already from people not liking their beliefs challenged.

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

It’s hard when you’re a brave truth teller challenging evolution (which as we all know is just made up by gay freemasons)

 

[Cruciferi]

When you say life, do you mean biological processes?

No, I’m referring to living organisms.

Or do you mean life in the sense that God is required for those processes to be a possibility, to become animated?

Without God there would be no life at all. He supplies the Life Force or Animation.

Or do you mean that life requires a being who directly constructs the first organism in order for life to get going? If so why does that view appeal to you? Is it really necessary?

This is a distinct possibility. As I’ve said before and in other Threads, I don’t believe life originated on Earth. Eden may describe an inaccessible area outside of our Universe where life is created and exported. If the Earth is periodically reseeded this could explain rebounds after Mass Extinction Events

 

[sevenswords]

Not all are gay, just the ones they sent to the seminaries to teach evolution.

 

[PickyPicky]

for how long did they not produce girls

Once a woman has produced only daughters, all her descendants will not carry her mitochondrial dna. It’s not a question of no other women living at the time or of no other women leaving descendants.

EDIT : only sons, of course.

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

That’s where you’ve been deceived. They’re ALL gay. Dinosaurs are part of the secret gay Muslim agenda.

 

[MikeInVA]

You stated that you have an issue with people who reject theistic evolution. I assumed that meant that you were in favor of it?