The Rage of the GLBT - Karma for the Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lost_Wanderer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Though I am non-Christian, I do not believe Christians beat up people who are perceived as homosexual. What I will say having known these cases is that most of them are young men defending themselves after homosexual committed criminal abuse such as homosexual grabs a young man’s butt or crotch against will (criminal assault and battery possibly sex abuse) and after the man defends himself by punching the gay in the face, the gay for sympathy tells of how he got bashed by intolerant bigots in an unprovoked attacked (even calling them Christians w/o knowing their faith) though it was the homosexual’s who committed sex abuse before men defended themselves.
Can you supply any credible sources for your statements or are they just your own observations? In my life I have known 100s of gay men both professionally (as patients) and socially and know or have heard of very few such incidents.
 
Mary was a Saint.

Neither murder was justified.

BUT…Mary’s murder was widely ignored while Shepard’s murder was heralded by gay activists through out the media as the “Hate Crime” of the century.

Why?
I believe the press may be responsible for much of the attention. Its human nature. Gay murders are will attract a more diverse group of readers, including the “fag” haters. They elicit all kinds emotions.
 
I’ve seen so many debates here regarding homosexuality but I often have trouble seeing this particular sub-topic being discussed.

But before I go on, here’s a disclaimer: I don’t care for the GLBT agenda. To half the gays I know, I’m a friend but the kind of friend that’s never without a Fred Sanford-style remark.

What I don’t get is so why are so many Christians crying about the GLBT agenda winning so many hearts and sympathies? I just don’t get it. You’re talking about a minority that really has been bullied, harassed, and marginalized by religious authorities.

Now I hear Christians whining about them playing the victim card. Well Mr. Fred Phelps, who do you think gave them that card in the first place? 🤷

Don’t you think it’s intellectually dishonest for Catholics to engage in a culture war with the GLBT movement and ignore just how much of its anger came from religious mistreatment? Don’t any of you even consider the idea that the whole movement was a backlash waiting to happen?

How could anyone act like this wasn’t coming?
Maybe we did have this coming. We’ve been too uncharitable towards them. (Yes uncharitable) Yes, homosexual actsare very grave and abominable sins, but Christians haven’t preaching that truth with the reminder that God, even in their sin, still loves them very much.

While Catholics should oppose the redefinition of marriage, I think we also need to remind LGBT people that we’re not out there to get them. There’s a sentiment among the LGBT community that us Catholics and other Christians want to seem them dead. They feel we want to lynch them, beat them up, or bully and ostracize them and that’s simply not true. A Catholic should hope and pray everyone makes it to heaven, LGBT people included.
 
As a female, I really don’t understand why guys think it is okay to punch some guy in the face just because someone pinched his tushy. Most females have had this happen at least once in their life. Do you see us bashing guys in the face? No, we get told not to dress so provocatively, don’t go to places where that might happen, take it as a compliment.
Because the homosexual committed criminal assault and battery and possibly sex abuse and the straight man defended himself. Also, if the man does nothing the homosexual could do something worse such as molestation or murder so ‘pinching the tushy’ can easily escalate to something worse in seconds. The first thing molesters do are the deeds described. But heterosexually or homosexually, you have no right to touch any person’s private parts against their will and people have a right to defend themselves. You’re giving sympathy to homosexuals who committed criminal assault and battery while condemning the men who defend themselves. If a thief is stealing from a store, do you then suggest the storekeeper just tolerate this stealing do nothing?
 
Most females have had this happen at least once in their life. Do you see us bashing guys in the face?
Actually you sometimes do see this happen and when it does most people do not sympathize with the men on the view that they committed sex abuse and the woman fought back. There are many men in jail for doing this because it is** criminal assault and battery up to sex abuse for a man to touch a woman’s boobs against will ** and there have even been some cases where men have been false accused of abusing women. During the Jodi Ann Arias murder trial, her dead boyfriend was falsely accused of abusing her when it was the other way round. Jury didn’t believe Jodi Ann Arias and found her guilty of 1st Degree Murder. So men do not get away with doing this to women and in a few cases, men have been falsely accused.
 
Because the homosexual committed criminal assault and battery and possibly sex abuse and the straight man defended himself. Also, if the man does nothing the homosexual could do something worse such as molestation or murder so ‘pinching the tushy’ can easily escalate to something worse in seconds. The first thing molesters do are the deeds described. But heterosexually or homosexually, you have no right to touch any person’s private parts against their will and people have a right to defend themselves. You’re giving sympathy to homosexuals who committed criminal assault and battery while condemning the men who defend themselves. If a thief is stealing from a store, do you then suggest the storekeeper just tolerate this stealing do nothing?
No, I am not giving sympathy to gay men. I also am not giving straight men any sympathy.

I am saying that men should deal with it the same way women deal with it. Assume you did something to deserve it, change your style of clothing, don’t go anywhere where gay men are, smile and pretend it didn’t happen, or feel complimented that you are considered attractive. Don’t ever complain about it or you may be called overly sensitive or worse.
 
No, I am not giving sympathy to gay men. I also am not giving straight men any sympathy.

I am saying that men should deal with it the same way women deal with it. Assume you did something to deserve it, change your style of clothing, don’t go anywhere where gay men are, smile and pretend it didn’t happen, or feel complimented that you are considered attractive. Don’t ever complain about it or you may be called overly sensitive or worse.
After all, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
 
No, I am not giving sympathy to gay men. I also am not giving straight men any sympathy.

I am saying that men should deal with it the same way women deal with it. Assume you did something to deserve it, change your style of clothing, don’t go anywhere where gay men are, smile and pretend it didn’t happen, or feel complimented that you are considered attractive. Don’t ever complain about it or you may be called overly sensitive or worse.
In my life, I’ve not ever been told those things.

The call for modesty in dress is not to suggest they are inviting rape, but that they are being purposely alluring to the opposite sex. That in no way condones rape.

A woman who covers herself is not hiding her body as much as she is revealing her dignity.

God bless.
 
In my life, I’ve not ever been told those things.

The call for modesty in dress is not to suggest they are inviting rape, but that they are being purposely alluring to the opposite sex. That in no way condones rape.

A woman who covers herself is not hiding her body as much as she is revealing her dignity.

God bless.
I am not saying people told me directly that I should grin and bear it. Nor was I condoning rape (which I don’t believe was in the original example). And even modestly dresses women get harassed. Most of us learn at an early age to pretend it didn’t happen, or being good girls, wonder what we did to bring on the behavior. We don’t go around beating people up. We don’t even call the cops.
 
Maybe we did have this coming. We’ve been too uncharitable towards them. (Yes uncharitable) Yes, homosexual actsare very grave and abominable sins, but Christians haven’t preaching that truth with the reminder that God, even in their sin, still loves them very much.

While Catholics should oppose the redefinition of marriage, I think we also need to remind LGBT people that we’re not out there to get them. There’s a sentiment among the LGBT community that us Catholics and other Christians want to seem them dead. They feel we want to lynch them, beat them up, or bully and ostracize them and that’s simply not true. A Catholic should hope and pray everyone makes it to heaven, LGBT people included.
I haven’t been uncharitable to them.In fact in my 6 decades as Catholic I have never seen this as a issue at all.Homosexuality really if ever comes up.Of course those who complain the most are not looking for more charity from the Church.They are looking for the Church to charge their teachings and accept their behavior as normal. For many merely starting Church teaching is considered uncharitable and an attack on homosexuals m
 
I never claimed that they were Catholic; many black churches can be quite homophobic.

Define “homosexuality”

I think we need to focus more on teaching to young people that fornication is intrinsically disordered.

Don’t forget 13 year old girls being propositioned by men old enough to be their grandfathers where “he’s just a dirty old man, you shouldn’t be dressing so provocatively” whereas if a 18 year old guy gets hit on a by a 25 year old guy that’s apparently justification for a beating because he deserved it.

Well, if it is anything like the “Violent Lesbian Gangs a Growing Problem” that the O’Reilly Factor commented on it’s probably lesbians responding with force to groping and repeated sexual harassment. Guys, motorboarding lesbians is a really bad idea.
The OP stated abuse of LGBT by religious authorities, so when you told about being beaten up by men, I thought you were referencing abuse by religious authorities.

I agree with you on the double standard. It’s perfectly okay for heterosexual men to harass women, but when the shoe is on the other foot, than all bets are off and suddenly it’s not okay.
 
What, Fox News hasn’t done a story on the gang of lesbians in Tennessee who roam around beating up people? How sad. After reading the posts on this thread, I’m truly glad that none here have a LGBT son, daughter or brother or sister. How could you ever stand to acknowledge that you are related to such horrible humans?🤷
The sad thing is that some of them do have an LGBT kid.,

And when the kid leaves the church, they’ll tell them they were just acting in love. They won’t be able to see the kid didn’t leave because of what the church taught - it’s how the christians act that drives people away.
 
I find it interesting that the anti gay movement is now playing the victim card and throwing a fit about being marginalized in public life.

I would be far, far more sympathetic about incidents like the Mozilla guy being forced to resign if the anti gay movement hadn’t spent so much of their time trying to keep gays out of public life. If they had just kept it to marriage, fine. But the refusal to pass the employment nondiscrimination act, the state laws and bills that try to allow for discrimination against gays, trying to keep gays out of the military, the boy scouts, etc.

Oh yeah, this is definitely karma.
This.

I have a lot of trouble taking someone who claims to be persecuted because of their view on gay marriage seriously. I don’t care what they’ve dealt with, it’s nothing compared to what the LGBT community has put up with so long.
 
This.

I have a lot of trouble taking someone who claims to be persecuted because of their view on gay marriage seriously. I don’t care what they’ve dealt with, it’s nothing compared to what the LGBT community has put up with so long.
This is really a bad attitude to have towards discrimination. I don’t think Christ said it was okay to look down on other people, so long as they had it coming. The actions towards the LGBT community were wrong, yes, but that doesn’t condone how members of the Church are starting to be treated. I don’t get this mentality of eye-for-an-eye. You don’t have to be a Christian to see that’s not the right way. It also shouldn’t be on some scale of severity. Discrimination is simply wrong regardless of who it is targeted towards and who is discriminating.
 
This is really a bad attitude to have towards discrimination. I don’t think Christ said it was okay to look down on other people, so long as they had it coming. The actions towards the LGBT community were wrong, yes, but that doesn’t condone how members of the Church are starting to be treated. I don’t get this mentality of eye-for-an-eye. You don’t have to be a Christian to see that’s not the right way. It also shouldn’t be on some scale of severity. Discrimination is simply wrong regardless of who it is targeted towards and who is discriminating.
This.^^^^^
It acknowledges that wrongs have been committed toward the community and others.
Since when does a wrong committed justify the condemnation of even the innocent?
 
Define “homosexuality”
I’ll take a stab at it, if I may.

**Homosexuality is same-gender sexual conduct.

A homosexual is a person who defines himself or herself by the participation in or desire to participate in such conduct.**

This definition is both logical and intuitively sound.
 
I’ll take a stab at it, if I may.

**Homosexuality is same-gender sexual conduct.

A homosexual is a person who defines himself or herself by the participation in or desire to participate in such conduct.**

This definition is both logical and intuitively sound.
It is less logical and intuitive than saying “disinterested” means “apathy”.
 
This thread has turned ugly.
It is hard to have a thread start with such a loaded concept as “thread” and “karma” not turn ugly.

Public opinion is a fickle concept, one that it is hard to play to. Unlike truth, it is amorphous and evolving. I suspect that the pendulum will swing back against them and sympathy will wane as they become more outrageous with their demands for special treatment. Once demands are met, it fuels the desire for more.

How is the Gay Agenda like a parish liturgy committee? Both are always wanting more and neither can be negotiated with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top