T
Tigg
Guest
Now, gays stay loud so that people at least know they exist and that stereotypes and false representations are not accurate.
Gay people only come out publicly if they have to.
which is it?
Now, gays stay loud so that people at least know they exist and that stereotypes and false representations are not accurate.
Gay people only come out publicly if they have to.
Yes Catholics do take morality very seriously.You should to.Just the complete reverse! I’m not gay. I 100% don’t give a flying noodle about what the Church actually condemns. I just find it incredibly telling when Christians cry about being ‘persecuted’ by the GLBT movement when it was created by the very same people who took that law waaaaaaay too seriously.
Both. Currently gay people need to be out so as to avoid a backslide into the waters of the 60s, when gays were routinely isolated, beaten, raped, and killed. Hopefully we cross the hill eventually where people no longer need to be exposed to homosexuality to know that it’s a normal variation of human sexual orientation.![]()
which is it?
You left out an important line. It usually goes:Well, you’ll never convince me. There are threads on this very forum if you care to search where the debate was between posters who admitted to not only being gay, but wanting and needing others to know. The debate went something like this:
Poster #1: I am gay and Catholic. You need to accept me for who I am in your parish. The Church said so.
**Poster #2: ** That’s too much information. You are a child of God and that’s all I need to know. I must treat everyone, no matter who they are, with dignity and respect.
Want to see my porn collection?Yes Catholics do take morality very seriously.You should to.
I am always amused at how many those who tell us there is nothing wrong with homosexuality go out of their way to make it very clear that they themselves are not a homosexual.Reminds me of a Seinfeld episode.
What homosexual bashers?Want to see my porn collection?Or would you like some tips on how to insult gays without any religious reference whatsoever? I tell ya, it’s a wonderful skill.
Like I said, I’m hardly the rainbow-flag-waving type. I’ve just lost a whole lotta respect for Catholic morality in the past year. This is but one tip of the whole iceberg. The entire institution is riled up to fight the culture war like America in 1942.
Unfortunately, not even Germany could claim a victim card quite much like the GLBT. All thanks because the Church neglected to put a leash on the gay bashers when it had the chance.
Right back to my question, are you suggesting that Christianity didn’t harbor people who advocated violence, and actively engaged in violence, against gay people?What homosexual bashers?
Give me some examples of people who bashed homosexuals who the Church failed to discipline. I have been a Catholic for over 60 years and have never witnessed the animosity towards homosexuals you claim was quite common.Right back to my question, are you suggesting that Christianity didn’t harbor people who advocated violence, and actively engaged in violence, against gay people?
Protestants.Give me some examples of people who bashed homosexuals who the Church failed to discipline. I have been a Catholic for over 60 years and have never witnessed the animosity towards homosexuals you claim was quite common.
I know of no Protestant Denominations that ever advocated violence against homosexuals or harbored people who did.Protestants.
youtube.com/watch?v=fTiBv99MYDkI know of no Protestant Denominations that ever advocated violence against homosexuals or harbored people who did.
This video is you evidence that Protestant denominations promote violence against homosexuals and harbor those who do so;youtube.com/watch?v=fTiBv99MYDk
The “If your daughter is acting a bit butch, you tell her…that means you’re gonna be beautiful, you’re gonna be attractive, you’re gonna dress yourself up!” is especially great. And we wonder why our daughters have self-esteem issues.
Protestants do not fall under canon law and are not subject to discipline by the Catholic Church.Protestants.
True, but the actions of Protestants sure as hell shape popular opinion of the Church. And the membership of the Church is more than capable of criticizing the actions. A line about discrimination being “deplorable” in an encyclical very few non-Catholics will read is nice and a moral good, but not effective. The laity needs to stop pretending that nothing is happening to gays. I mean, look at the massive conservative Protestant support for the Uganda bill. Look how the local Catholic Archbishop expressed support for the law, and received no public condemnation from the Vatican. These are the things gays & lesbians see, and as long as they are, gays & lesbians will rarely join [or return to] the Church.Protestants do not fall under canon law and are not subject to discipline by the Catholic Church.
Okay.There are many contributions married people gay or straight make to their communities other than children. Depending on your perspective there are economic and family benefits. One ROI that is well known is that SS couples adopt many hard to place children. Let’s think about that.
“it is necessary to emphasize the right of children to grow up within a family, with a father and a mother able to create a suitable environment for their development and emotional maturity. Continuing to mature in the relationship, in the complementarity of the masculinity and femininity of a father and a mother, and thus preparing the way for emotional maturity,” according to the Vatican Information Service.
"At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”
For the life of me, I cannot understand why any homosexual would want to join (or remain in) the Catholic Church. Unless their agenda is to fundamentally change 2000 years of teaching based on God’s revelation.True, but the actions of Protestants sure as hell shape popular opinion of the Church. And the membership of the Church is more than capable of criticizing the actions. A line about discrimination being “deplorable” in an encyclical very few non-Catholics will read is nice and a moral good, but not effective. The laity needs to stop pretending that nothing is happening to gays. I mean, look at the massive conservative Protestant support for the Uganda bill. Look how the local Catholic Archbishop expressed support for the law, and received no public condemnation from the Vatican. ** These are the things gays & lesbians see, and as long as they are, gays & lesbians will rarely join [or return to] the Church**.
Quote:
Then may I ask, why are you even a Catholic and why do you care to argue with this? Your attitude in this thread has also been quite telling…while you may have an empathy face for the GLBT community and the violence and discrimination they’ve faced, with the other face you express derision toward your own brethren.Just the complete reverse! I’m not gay. I 100% don’t give a flying noodle about what the Church actually condemns. I just find it incredibly telling when Christians cry about being ‘persecuted’ by the GLBT movement when it was created by the very same people who took that law waaaaaaay too seriously.
Eventually down the line, I do believe that is the goal. Recently, the Presbyterian Church made a ruling about homosexual relationships. They determined homosexual “marriage” was Christian. I don’t understand how their “ruling” changes what has been stated in scripture, and from Christian tradition. If a Catholic realizes they’re gay, but chooses to live a life of celibacy it’s one thing. But to insist that the Church needs to accommodate to homosexual unions is just not acceptable. There is a country in Europe where a church cannot refuse gays a wedding and if they do, the priest of the church is responsible for finding them a place to marry. Which is reprehensible IMO.For the life of me, I cannot understand why any homosexual would want to join (or remain in) the Catholic Church. Unless their agenda is to fundamentally change 2000 years of teaching based on God’s revelation.
I don’t think you have all the facts. A great majority of children in foster care aren’t eligible for adoption because of the court system. In many of these cases, they are from families where the parents are incarcerated due to drugs or a crime. The courts won’t allow them to be adopted because they have blood relatives, but the procedure of allowing them into the care of these relatives is full of red tape and more court proceedings. Adopting a child in many counties across states is the same thing. It’s not as simple as you believe.Seems everyone complains about it but no one whats to do anything about it. And when a particular group wants to provide, cost free, something that we desperately need in the US there are those who say no thank you, we will just let Jinny remain in foster care for a another year or two.
The latter statement is better. After all** true** Catholics lie, cheat, steal, hate and gossip. As long as there is no effort to change Church teaching, then I can accept that living the life of a saint may take a lifetime.A true Catholic homosexual would not be arguing “loop holes” in Catholic teaching for the purpose of advancing acceptance of homosexuality. They would accept Catholic teaching and live their life accordingly.
Likewise, a homosexual who is drawn to the Catholic Church for the purpose of salvation would leave his/her “baggage” at the door, accept Catholic teaching and make every effort to live their life accordingly.