The Rapture

  • Thread starter Thread starter Louemma
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, that’s the problem. There are no private teachings in the bible. The teachings come to us from the apostles and early church fathers and as the holy spirit has given us greater insights into the SAME original handed down teachings

James
Could you expound on this some, clairify it some? I would disagree if you’re suggesting that the Spirit will not offer you a unique insight applicable to you, in your own life which is different than what someone sitting right next to you might get reading the same passage. This kind of thing does happen all the time, with in the CC and there is nothing wrong with that. This is part of what reading scripture is all about, it’s one leg of the stool upon which our faith rests, we most certainly get personal messages from it.

Where we draw the line is at layity trying to draw up “infallible doctrine” based upon what “I got once reading from the book of Daniel” or some such thing. Such private revelations are meant for you and you alone. I’ve experienced this my self before, in a lecto-divina session with my young adult ministry. For me it’s always something regarding changes I need to make to my life, or a message to remain patient in some aspect of my life or something like that. That isn’t Sola Scriptura, it’s just reading scripture with a pious intent and being led to a very personal message regarding an aspect of your life that’s been on your mind.
 
Ryanoneil …

What do you make of Joel 2:28-32 & its NT link … Acts 2:17-21 ?

Fulfilled already [Proof-texted by Peter in Acts 2:22] or yet to transpire ?
Fulfilled. Pentecost confirms the arrival of the messianic age.
 
Could you expound on this some, clairify it some? I would disagree if you’re suggesting that the Spirit will not offer you a unique insight applicable to you, in your own life which is different than what someone sitting right next to you might get reading the same passage. This kind of thing does happen all the time, with in the CC and there is nothing wrong with that. This is part of what reading scripture is all about, it’s one leg of the stool upon which our faith rests, we most certainly get personal messages from it.

Where we draw the line is at layity trying to draw up “infallible doctrine” based upon what “I got once reading from the book of Daniel” or some such thing. Such private revelations are meant for you and you alone. I’ve experienced this my self before, in a lecto-divina session with my young adult ministry. For me it’s always something regarding changes I need to make to my life, or a message to remain patient in some aspect of my life or something like that. That isn’t Sola Scriptura, it’s just reading scripture with a pious intent and being led to a very personal message regarding an aspect of your life that’s been on your mind.
There are no “tea leaves” and soothsaying to be found in scripture. I know of a few non-Catholics who randomly open the bible up daily and expect to get some kind of new daily fortune cookie kind of message. When they get the same message a few days in a row they imagine its divine revelation when its more probable that the bible is just opening up to the pages that are broken in the most to what they have been personally reading and contemplating.

That said, lecto-divina is a very valid form of group bible reading & meditation. It is used in some of the Catholic religious orders. We used it when I was involved with lay third order Carmelite formation and very powerful “Group Insights” can come of this form of contemplation. So withe the proper disciplines this can be a good tool. From it a group can draw deeper insights into biblical verses one is already very familiar with to get past mental blocks and the tendency to gloss over familiar material and miss the subtleties. But we are never free to self-interpret entirely new meaning into scripture that runs contrary to Church Dogmatic teachings. I have seen that start to happen and one generally needs a moderator or leader to be watchful of spurious conjectures and ideas counter to church teaching.

The Holy Spirit never reveals a completely new truth to individuals that He has not already revealed to the Church in the Deposit of Faith. He may however expand on depth and detail or give fresh ways of seeing the same truth expressed in a more culturally meaningful manner. He has done this through the saints many times. But in all cases all gifts of insight and revelation are principally for the overall Good of Christ’s Church - either to prepare the individual to better serve Christ or to help the Church get to the next level of what Christ wants it to do. Things like the Divine Mercy and the Sacred Heart of Jesus devotions all came from deep revelations to very pious Catholics (who are now saints) who shared their insights with The Church or advanced themselves in holiness to better serve the Church.

But I am very leery of those who randomly read scripture and look for some personal message that they are hoping will change their lives. That hope is misdirected since we are given that promise during baptism and the Holy Spirit will guide The Church to all truth as they are ready for it. The truth comes only through The Church at large. Bu sure, greater individual insights can and do come from scripture readings. This is where the popes and the bishops and priests all get their powerful sermons from - scripture reading and prayer and living a pious life. But I am can get very concerned too that many of the “prosperity gospel” advocates are using the bible to “tell them” how to make investment and business decisions.

I think prudence is necessary. I don’t see making personal and business decisions by randomly reading bible passages and declaring “that was meant for me” as being any different than flipping a coin with “In God we Trust” embossed on it and calling “heads” or “tails” then putting your money on it. That said, we can certainly draw a lot of inspiration and comfort to remove anxiety and gain the peace we need to make sound life decisions after prayerful consideration.

James
 
I can see how the Lord’s supper could be the marriage supper,becoming the body of Christ.So by the Gentiles being gathered in to the family of God,we are the invited guest.So would this line up with the outer court left for the gentiles(Revelation 11:2)
Well if we are the guest does this mean the gentiles are adopted and the Jews are the true children and by the Jews rejecting Christ would explain the parable of THE Wedding Feast"(Matt.22:2-14)
If you go back to Jesus cleansing the Temple, He cites Isa 56:3-8 when he says a house of prayer. In context, Isaiah sees God gathering all nations to his Temple. And Gentiles won’t be excluded from his covenant people. When Jesus calls them a den of robbers the context is from Jer 7:11, and Jeremiah was delivering a sermon of judgment to Israelites in the the Temple. Jesus acusses them of selling animals in the outermost court of the Gentiles, preventing them from truely worshiping, and says the establishment was obstructing God. Jesus is recalling that Israel disregarded Jeremiah and God destroyed Solomon’s Temple in 586 b.c. If they failed to repent, the Temple would be destroyed again.

In the parable of the wicked tenants the vineyard is Jerusalem. The tenants are Israel’s leaders. God will put them to death when He judges Jerusalem. Then He would entrust the New Covenant kingdom to the other tenants in the Church.
So then it would be safe to assume the parable of the 10 brides maid is really about some one’s lamp being full by way of saying,Salvation through Jesus Christ as the oil in the lamps:)
This could be:)
The lamp is Christian faith and the oil represents good works. Souls must prepare for their personal encounter with Christ (bridegroom) by loving God and neighbor, since those lacking good works will be shut out of heaven’s banquet.
 
There are no “tea leaves” and soothsaying to be found in scripture. I know of a few non-Catholics who randomly open the bible up daily and expect to get some kind of new daily fortune cookie kind of message. When they get the same message a few days in a row they imagine its divine revelation when its more probable that the bible is just opening up to the pages that are broken in the most to what they have been personally reading and contemplating.
The reading of scripture should always be with pious intent, and never with false expectation i.e. to try and determain your future as you seem to be trying to indicating. That said, that doesn’t make any of what I said invalid, the Spirit most certainly will speak to you through scripture.
That said, lecto-divina is a very valid form of group bible reading & meditation. It is used in some of the Catholic religious orders. We used it when I was involved with lay third order Carmelite formation and very powerful “Group Insights” can come of this form of contemplation. So withe the proper disciplines this can be a good tool. From it a group can draw deeper insights into biblical verses one is already very familiar with to get past mental blocks and the tendency to gloss over familiar material and miss the subtleties. But we are never free to self-interpret entirely new meaning into scripture that runs contrary to Church Dogmatic teachings. I have seen that start to happen and one generally needs a moderator or leader to be watchful of spurious conjectures and ideas counter to church teaching.
And what is lecto-divina based on? Scripture, it’s based upon meditation upon scripture, and you most certainly get personal messages from this. As you most certainly can get personal messages from reading scripture any time you read, study meditate upon it with pious intent.
The Holy Spirit never reveals a completely new truth to individuals that He has not already revealed to the Church in the Deposit of Faith. He may however expand on depth and detail or give fresh ways of seeing the same truth expressed in a more culturally meaningful manner. He has done this through the saints many times. But in all cases all gifts of insight and revelation are principally for the overall Good of Christ’s Church - either to prepare the individual to better serve Christ or to help the Church get to the next level of what Christ wants it to do. Things like the Divine Mercy and the Sacred Heart of Jesus devotions all came from deep revelations to very pious Catholics (who are now saints) who shared their insights with The Church or advanced themselves in holiness to better serve the Church.
I think you’re getting mixed up with personal revelation and Church doctrine. The spirit most certainly has reveled much to many individual personally… In fact I would argue that in certain specific and extrodenary cases the Spirit has reveled (through means, typically outside of the bible) messages of church wide importance via private revelation. I’m thinking about the Rosary, Fatima, Guatalupe among many other such cases. There is a place for private revelation, by and large it’s typically no more than a subtle tap on the shoulder and the message is only applicable to that person in their current life situation.
But I am very leery of those who randomly read scripture and look for some personal message that they are hoping will change their lives. That hope is misdirected since we are given that promise during baptism and the Holy Spirit will guide The Church to all truth as they are ready for it. The truth comes only through The Church at large. Bu sure, greater individual insights can and do come from scripture readings. This is where the popes and the bishops and priests all get their powerful sermons from - scripture reading and prayer and living a pious life. But I am can get very concerned too that many of the “prosperity gospel” advocates are using the bible to “tell them” how to make investment and business decisions.
As you should be, as there are many people out there not doing things with a pure intent. But that doesn’t invalidate the fact that the Spirit can and does speak to many individuals, with messages applicable to them, through many different means INCLUDING through scripture.
I think prudence is necessary. I don’t see making personal and business decisions by randomly reading bible passages and declaring “that was meant for me” as being any different than flipping a coin with “In God we Trust” embossed on it and calling “heads” or “tails” then putting your money on it. That said, we can certainly draw a lot of inspiration and comfort to remove anxiety and gain the peace we need to make sound life decisions after prayerful consideration.

James
But you’ve crossed the line from prudence, to near outright disbelief that the spirit is talking to people.
 
The reading of scripture should always be with pious intent, and never with false expectation i.e. to try and determain your future as you seem to be trying to indicating. That said, that doesn’t make any of what I said invalid, the Spirit most certainly will speak to you through scripture.

And what is lecto-divina based on? Scripture, it’s based upon meditation upon scripture, and you most certainly get personal messages from this. As you most certainly can get personal messages from reading scripture any time you read, study meditate upon it with pious intent.

I think you’re getting mixed up with personal revelation and Church doctrine. The spirit most certainly has reveled much to many individual personally… In fact I would argue that in certain specific and extrodenary cases the Spirit has reveled (through means, typically outside of the bible) messages of church wide importance via private revelation. I’m thinking about the Rosary, Fatima, Guatalupe among many other such cases. There is a place for private revelation, by and large it’s typically no more than a subtle tap on the shoulder and the message is only applicable to that person in their current life situation.

As you should be, as there are many people out there not doing things with a pure intent. But that doesn’t invalidate the fact that the Spirit can and does speak to many individuals, with messages applicable to them, through many different means INCLUDING through scripture.

But you’ve crossed the line from prudence, to near outright disbelief that the spirit is talking to people.
For the sake of staying on the the topic of the thread, I’ll just say, I think you and CFL are saying essentially the same thing, just coming at it from opposite ends, and meeting in the middle.
 
Paul teaches Pre-Trib Rapture of Church it would seem. Hebrews 11:5-6

"By faith Enoch was TAKEN UP so that he should NOT SEE DEATH; and he WAS NOT FOUND because God had TAKEN HIM. Now before he was taken he was attested as having pleased God. And without faith it is impossible to please him. For whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that HE REWARDS THOSE WHO SEEK HIM.

Clearly, Paul is teaching here that God used example of Enoch to PREFIGURE his Church on earth. Those in the Church will be rewarded with RAPTURE … before the End Time Trials, that faced those left on earth in days of Noah & GREAT FLOOD.

Case closed – It’s Clearly Pre-Trib … unless CFJ can see an obvious disconnect in my logic. 🙂
Per (1 Thes 4) we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, shall not precede those who have fallen asleep. The resurrection of the dead precedes the rapture. The resurrection of the dead occurs on the “last day” of the world (John 6:39-54; 11:24; 12:48). Because the rapture follows the resurrection, the rapture also occurs on the “last day."

“And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him” (Heb. 9:27-28).

This second appearance of Christ is His second and final appearance at the end of the world when He will judge the living and the dead.
 
John 14:26 But the counselor,the Holy Spirit,whom the Father will send in my name,will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.

According to the word of God,the Holy Spirit can and will teach us in the scriptures.We all know that we can read tons of other books but do the sentences in those books pop back to our memory?
How many times has the Holy Spirit brought God’s word back to the mind of a child of God?What an amazing God we have and the Holy Spirit will teach us in the scriptures and will reveal to us what the Father would have us do,according to his word.So yes,God speaks to us today,loud and clear by his word.The Holy Spirit reminds us of this word as God speaks to us through his word.I will keep searching the word and the spirit will teach me what God would reveal according to his word.
I don’t suppose I will make a good Catholic but I do the work of the Father as a Christian,that means"One Who Follows Christ"
I do know by God’s word there is not person on here that can provide scripture stating"The Catching Away occurs only after the tribulation.The Bible does not make it clear when this event will occur.
 
“Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.” (John 5:28-29)

Jesus says that the resurrection will occur at “the hour” which is the same as saying the resurrection will occur on the “last day” because an hour is part of one day, and that is the “last day” per John 6, 11 and 12. This does not refer to a 1,000 year day which ends and gives way to another day (which would be the second to last day). Jesus also says that “all who are in the tombs will hear his voice". This follows Paul’s teaching on the resurrection/rapture event when he says that the Lord will descend from heaven with “a cry of command,” and the “dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess. 4:16).

Finally, Jesus is clear that at this “hour” both those who have done good and those who have done evil will rise at the same time. The good will be raised to life, and the evil will be raised to judgment.
 
The apostasy comes first. Then after the tribulation the Lord comes and we assemble with him.

We ask you, brothers, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our assembling with him, not to be shaken out of your minds suddenly, or to be alarmed either by a “spirit,” or by an oral statement, or by a letter allegedly from us to the effect that the day of the Lord is at hand. Let no one deceive you in any way. For unless the apostasy comes first and the lawless one is revealed, the one doomed to perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god and object of worship, so as to seat himself in the temple of God, claiming that he is a god (2 Thes 2:1-4)

"But in those days after that tribulation the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling from the sky, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. And then they will see ‘the Son of Man coming in the clouds’ with great power and glory, and then he will send out the angels and gather (his) elect from the four winds, from the end of the earth to the end of the sky. (Mk 13:24-27)


or read the longer version in Matthew which places it after the tribulation.
usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew24.htm#v21
 
The reading of scripture should always be with pious intent, and never with false expectation i.e. to try and determain your future as you seem to be trying to indicating. That said, that doesn’t make any of what I said invalid, the Spirit most certainly will speak to you through scripture.

And what is lecto-divina based on? Scripture, it’s based upon meditation upon scripture, and you most certainly get personal messages from this. As you most certainly can get personal messages from reading scripture any time you read, study meditate upon it with pious intent.

I think you’re getting mixed up with personal revelation and Church doctrine. The spirit most certainly has reveled much to many individual personally… In fact I would argue that in certain specific and extrodenary cases the Spirit has reveled (through means, typically outside of the bible) messages of church wide importance via private revelation. I’m thinking about the Rosary, Fatima, Guatalupe among many other such cases. There is a place for private revelation, by and large it’s typically no more than a subtle tap on the shoulder and the message is only applicable to that person in their current life situation.

As you should be, as there are many people out there not doing things with a pure intent. But that doesn’t invalidate the fact that the Spirit can and does speak to many individuals, with messages applicable to them, through many different means INCLUDING through scripture.

But you’ve crossed the line from prudence, to near outright disbelief that the spirit is talking to people.
No - we are substantially in agreement – just talking past each other here.

You are correct that The Holy Spirit has used private revelation to reinvigorate The Church – as so many Saints have done. But in all cases the private revelation build up on the existing teachings. I will say that ALL private revelation is principally for the benefit of The Church at large as are each and every spiritual gift we are each given in baptism. It is our life’s work to discern what our gifts are and to bring them to full maturation to help nurture and perfect The Church. Individuals are certainly able to benefit spiritually by their own fruits but by so doing they are also adding strength to the living stones that are built upon the foundation of the apostles which in turn are aligned to the cornerstone of Christ. The Church of Christ is a tower of light on the hills that runs counter to the Tower of Babel that secular man attempts to build up for himself.

The focus of the Holy Spirit is on sanctifying individual souls but overall He is also therein constantly perfecting His Church one living stone at a time through its members to raise the whole House of God ever higher to cast His light ever further for all to see and take notice and come hither.

James
 
after the tribulation the Lord comes and we assemble with him.

or read the longer version in Matthew which places it after the tribulation.
usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew24.htm#v21
Hold on now ! Let’s study the long version of Matt. 24.

Catholics uses verses 15-21 to explain destruction of Jews & Temple in 70 AD. You want to have it both ways … to explain both the past & future End Time events.

And, in verse 34 … Christ says “This Generation will not pass until this prophesy has been fulfilled” ----- again 70 AD reference.

Look @ 37-38 … (just as in the days of Noah, eating and drinking, making merry, scoffing at Noah) . Does this sound like folks who have just come thru 7 years of Great Tribulation ? NO WAY

What we need to do is read what the ECF’s said in their commentaries on Matt: 24 & Hebrews 11:4-7. Did Origen or Augustine every give us balanced, cogent explanations on these two texts? Show me where the ECF’s renounce Pre-Trib Rapture :yup:

To argue that that the Bride of Christ will not be ‘kept from harm’ … is illogical. The Church will be raptured as was Enoch … and those remaining will be in dire straits. Look at how God spared the early Church in 70AD. The Christians got out of there ahead of time … and were spared the chaos & destruction.

Some clearly will come to faith during the End Time trials … and be saved. And, the unbelieving Jews will come to Christ during this period.
 
CentralFLJames;6128983 said:
Recall the ‘OT is revealed in the new … the NT concealed in the old’. When Paul explains the OT Prefigurings to the Hebrews, we need see how they typify the Church.

The OT tells of Enoch, Moses, and Elijah being Raptured. But, only Moses and Elijah were with Christ on Mt. of Tranfiguration. Moses … representing the Law, Elijah … testifying to arrival of Christ. Where was Enoch ? What does Enoch represent … if not the Faith[ful] — God’s Church, yet to be disclosed to the Disciples.

Paul picked up on this … explaining it to the Hebrews, in his Epistle to them. Just as Enoch was Raptured, before the OT EndTime … so will the Church be Raptured, before the NT EndTime.
 
Recall the ‘OT is revealed in the new … the NT concealed in the old’. When Paul explains the OT Prefigurings to the Hebrews, we need see how they typify the Church.

The OT tells of Enoch, Moses, and Elijah being Raptured. But, only Moses and Elijah were with Christ on Mt. of Tranfiguration. Moses … representing the Law, Elijah … testifying to arrival of Christ. Where was Enoch ? What does Enoch represent … if not the Faith[ful] — God’s Church, yet to be disclosed to the Disciples.

Paul picked up on this … explaining it to the Hebrews, in his Epistle to them. Just as Enoch was Raptured, before the OT EndTime … so will the Church be Raptured, before the NT EndTime.
Sorry BRB - this is not at all consistent with Catholic teaching. The early church fathers decisively rejected millenarianism which goes hand in hand with pre-trib rapture. You have been highly influenced by modern “secular christian” conjectures and Darbyism. The “snatching up” or “rapture” happens at the end of time - the new Divine Generation where human history is over, Satan is defeated and God has the final word for “it all” - Judgement. The last four things are Death, Judgement, Heaven, Hell. There is no secret rapture in the pre-trib sense.

Notice that Moses was not raptured - the analogy is very weak and falls apart. It’s an interesting speculation but that is all it is. If you want to work OT prefigurement in here then consider this: Moses was not lifted up and raptured to heaven - he died within sight of the promised land. Moses’ view of the promised land from the mountain reminds us of the view of the holy city given to John from “a great and high mountain.” (Rev. 21:10)

James
 
The early church fathers decisively rejected millenarianism which goes hand in hand with pre-trib rapture. You have been highly influenced by modern “secular christian” conjectures and Darbyism.

Moses was not raptured It’s an interesting speculation but that is all it is. If you want to work OT prefigurement in here then consider this: Moses was not lifted up and raptured to heaven - he died within sight of the promised land. Moses’ view of the promised land from the mountain reminds us of the view of the holy city given to John from “a great and high mountain.” (Rev. 21:10)
Citations please … sources, texts re: ECF understandings /beliefs on the Rapture.

Moses told the people to remain behind … and he walked on ahead, out of their view. And, he was never found. To this day the Jews haven’t a clue to his burial site. The ‘promise land’ for Moses … was presence with the Lord [in Heaven]. He was too old to lead his people into the Holy Land on earth. That was mission bequeathed to Joshua, who was young … and ready to ‘fit the battle’.

Recall that Elijah was ALSO TAKEN OUT into a private place ‘at God’s instruction’ for his Rapture … and ONLY Elisha [a holy one, being able to receive a DOUBLE PORTION], was allowed to witness. Moses was Raptured … w/o a doubt. A secret rapture, which the unholy Israelites were not allowed to witness.

Later, we are informed that Moses was on the Mount in Jerusalem, with Elijah & Christ, … witnessed by the Disciples. And Christ told them to “TELL NO ONE” about it. Why ? This special unveiling of Moses, alive with Christ, …was for the Church [to know about]. Unbelievers still think Moses is dead and buried. The Church knows better ! Our first Papa … witnessed it !
 
Citations please … sources, texts re: ECF understandings /beliefs on the Rapture.

Moses told the people to remain behind … and he walked on ahead, out of their view. And, he was never found. To this day the Jews haven’t a clue to his burial site. The ‘promise land’ for Moses … was presence with the Lord [in Heaven]. He was too old to lead his people into the Holy Land on earth. That was mission bequeathed to Joshua, who was young … and ready to ‘fit the battle’.

Recall that Elijah was ALSO TAKEN OUT into a private place ‘at God’s instruction’ for his Rapture … and ONLY Elisha [a holy one, being able to receive a DOUBLE PORTION], was allowed to witness. Moses was Raptured … w/o a doubt. A secret rapture, which the unholy Israelites were not allowed to witness.

Later, we are informed that Moses was on the Mount in Jerusalem, with Elijah & Christ, … witnessed by the Disciples. And Christ told them to “TELL NO ONE” about it. Why ? This special unveiling of Moses, alive with Christ, …was for the Church [to know about]. Unbelievers still think Moses is dead and buried. The Church knows better ! Our first Papa … witnessed it !
BRB I am very surprised that you don’t seem to know your OT bible and think Moses had a secret rapture(!). This is just blatantly un-biblical. Just because the ancient Jews did not mark the grave to protect it from grave robbers does not diminish the plain words of scripture Moses “DIED THERE IN MOAB”.

DEATH OF MOSES
*Deuteronomy 34:4-8 Then the LORD said to him, “This is the land I promised on oath to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob when I said, ‘I will give it to your descendants.’ I have let you see it with your eyes, but you will not cross over into it.” 5 And Moses the servant of the LORD died there in Moab, as the LORD had said. 6 He buried him ** in Moab, in the valley opposite Beth Peor, but to this day no one knows where his grave is. 7 Moses was a hundred and twenty years old when he died, yet his eyes were not weak nor his strength gone. 8 The Israelites grieved for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days, until the time of weeping and mourning was over. **

I have given prior references in this thread about the Church rejecting millianariasm. WE ARE IN THE CHURCH AGE NOW - THIS is the FIGURATIVE 1000 years. MOST of what is in the Book of Revelation ALREADY HAPPENED. The Olivet Discourse is talking about the time before the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem.

Here is another reference you should read:
The Earthquake Generation (Jimmy Akin)

From Akin’s writings:
*
The Olivet Discourse is not talking about something in our future, but about something in our past—about the period leading up to the destruction of the Temple in A.D. 70. The material at the beginning of the Olivet Discourse certainly does not apply to the end of time, but to the forty years between Christ’s Ascension and the end of the Jewish War. Many miraculous signs in the heavens already were performed during this period (Acts 2:43, 5:12, 6:8, 8:6, 8:13, 14:2, 15:12). Even Jewish-Roman Historian Josephus records a number of them: “Thus there was a star resembling a sword [or a cross; cf. Matt. 24:30], which stood over the city, and a comet that continued for a whole year. . . . chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor were seen running about among the clouds” (ibid., 6:5:3).

Jesus specifically stated that “this generation will not pass away before all these things take place” (Mark 13:30; cf. Luke 21:32). It is therefore entirely reasonable to take the prophecy not as a reference to the future Second Coming, but as symbolic and apocalyptic language, modeled on Old Testament parallels, pointing to Christ’s judgment on Jerusalem—which did take place within that generation, when the city was sacked by the Romans. With the Temple destroyed we are now in The Church Age.

The preaching of the gospel to ‘all nations’ has already occurred as well;
To Mediterranean peoples back then, “the world” meant the known world and “the nations” meant those clustered around the Mediterranean. In Luke 2:1, the evangelist states that a decree had gone forth from Augustus Caesar that “all the world” should be enrolled. In Colossians 1:6, we find Paul saying that the gospel is bearing fruit and growing “in the whole world.” In Romans 1:5 he says that God sent him to bring about the obedience of faith “among all the nations.” He says in Romans 16:26 that God’s plan is being made known “to all nations” by the prophetic writings. In Colossians 1:23 Paul states that “the gospel . . . has been preached to every creature under heaven.”*

Jesus’ statements are read from the perspective of those he was addressing in Israel, they are not understood to be global predictions. He was speaking to them about things they would hear about in the period before the destruction of the Temple.

About Millenarianism & ECF References
[continued]

James*
 
[continued from above]

About Millenarianism and ECF belief

The origins of Millenarianism are rooted in the hopes of the Jews for a** temporal Messiah**. Though millenarianism had found numerous adherents among early Christians and had been upheld by several ecclesiastical theologians, neither in the post-Apostolic period nor in the course of the second century, does it appear as a universal doctrine of the Church or as a part of the Apostolic tradition. Repeat millenarianism is rejected before the close of the 2nd century and only a few minor advocates pop-up randomly for a century more. The primitive Apostolic symbol (original Creed) and our current updated Nicene Creed mentions the resurrection of the body and the return of Christ to judge the living and the dead, but it says not a word of the millennium

Church Father Justin Martyr personally believe in a millennial reign. When asked in the 2nd century if Christ would physically reign for 1000 years he stated, “I and many others are of this opinion, and [believe] that such will take place.” At the same time he admitted “that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise” (Dialogue with Trypho, 70).

The greatest opponent of early Christian millenarianism was Augustine of Hippo (354-450) – but he originally believed in it. In The City of God, he rejected millenarianism and offered a view of history largely free of end-times speculation. Throughout time and history, Augustine taught, the City of God and the City of Man were constantly in tension with one another. At the end of time, at the Last Judgment, the citizens of these two cities will finally be separated-the sheep from the goats (Matt. 25:32-46). Augustine saw God orchestrating time and history like an “unchanging conductor,” ordering events according to his will. Although the Catholic Church never officially endorsed Augustine’s interpretation, most Catholics accepted it as a reasonable conclusion.

But the most powerful adversary of millenarianism was Origen of Alexandria.

In summary, yes, the early church debated it and over a few centuries finally rejected it: Here is what the Catholic Catechism says:

*“The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism.” *

Note too that our own Creed prayed every Sunday appears to reject premillennialism:
Christ will return “to judge the living and the dead,” not to reign on earth for a thousand years and then judge the living and the dead.

If the Church is NOT pre-millennial, therefor the question of a pre-trib Rapture does not arise, as pre-tribulationism is a variant of pre-millennialism.

Historically speaking in Christendom MIllenarianism is all but dead after the 2nd century until the advent of Protestantism in the sixteenth century (1500 years). With Protestantism unleashing its wild ideas and errors Millenarianism again raises its head as Protestant again try to usher in a new epoch of millenarian doctrines. Protestant fanatics of the earlier years of Protestantism, particularly the Anabaptists, believed in a new, golden age under the sceptre of Christ. But to justify the revolution/break-away they now of course have to demonize The Catholic Church as the new enemy to usher themselves into the vanguard and further the fanciful vision to overthrow of the papacy and remove all secular empires.

Personally, my take is that in current times Millenarianism is used as a convenient way for non-Catholics to justify their existence and further their self opinion that they are the “true Christians”. It gives them the magic elixir necessary to live side by side with the uncomfortable fact that they can’t unify themselves nor account for the fact that The Catholic Church can’t be prevailed against or just be nice and go away so they can pretend that Protestantism succeeded in reforming the new invisible church. So the fundamentalist and evangelicals pacify themselves with these false doctrines. They cling to the hope that God will rapture the “True Believers[sup]®[/sup]” residing in the new “invisible church” away from the evil Catholic Church to ratify that they are elect. It just gives them a convenient way to put concerns about being wrong on the back burner so they can get on with life content that they are one of the elect. It’s all a fantasy and an irrational construction to permit those who think they are the new “chosen people” to cope with the large divide between a fundamentalist view of the bible (devoid of any apostolic teaching context) and what they really see in the real world (the rapidly splintering of Protestantism into legions of beliefs and doctrines and liberalization of the mores their forefathers got from the Catholic Church).

Wake up BRB.

James
 
Citations please … sources, texts re: ECF understandings /beliefs on the Rapture.

Moses told the people to remain behind … and he walked on ahead, out of their view. And, he was never found. To this day the Jews haven’t a clue to his burial site. The ‘promise land’ for Moses … was presence with the Lord [in Heaven]. He was too old to lead his people into the Holy Land on earth. That was mission bequeathed to Joshua, who was young … and ready to ‘fit the battle’.

Recall that Elijah was ALSO TAKEN OUT into a private place ‘at God’s instruction’ for his Rapture … and ONLY Elisha [a holy one, being able to receive a DOUBLE PORTION], was allowed to witness. Moses was Raptured … w/o a doubt. A secret rapture, which the unholy Israelites were not allowed to witness.

Later, we are informed that Moses was on the Mount in Jerusalem, with Elijah & Christ, … witnessed by the Disciples. And Christ told them to “TELL NO ONE” about it. Why ? This special unveiling of Moses, alive with Christ, …was for the Church [to know about]. Unbelievers still think Moses is dead and buried. The Church knows better ! Our first Papa … witnessed it !
If Moses was Raptured, then how is it Satan and St. Michael managed to have a battle over his body? He wasn’t raptured, or assumed body & sole into heaven.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top