G
guanophore
Guest
The infallible magesterium of the Church, which does include the Pope.And who might that be? The Pope?
The infallible magesterium of the Church, which does include the Pope.And who might that be? The Pope?
Free Will? If man has free will or, rather, freedom of choice does that not impinge in God’s omnipotence? But what sayeth the Scriptures.The philosophy goes that one will necessarily partake in good works if they are indeed a Christian, but, we also admit that we don’t know that much about free will (you’ll know them by their fruit… where were you when I was hungry… etc.)
It seems that the first sentence here is incomplete and I’m at pains to figure out what you mean.So, that being said, and keeping that in mind, our discussion of pre-millennialist philosophy.
Why is it that you prefer the interpretation you do, over the one I have given you?
So, why do you prefer your interpretation of the Bible to ours?And who might that be? The Pope?
Well, I prefer God, and I humbly submit to His Church, and the Traditions passed down to it. And it’s head, the Pope, who years ago submitted to God’s will and allowed a bishop to discern whether or not he could even become a priest.…
As to my preferences, well… maybe because I like me![]()
It was the Sadducees – that’s why they were SAD, You See?Was it the Pharisees or the Sadducees that believed in the resurrection? I can’t remember off the top of my head. They still disagree to this day. AND Rabbis have heard me say it.
So says you. However, the interpretation of the early Church contradicts your interpretation.Actually, MariaG when Paul asked for prayer for himself and his ministry he meant that they should pray to God thru Christ. Not to pray to Mary or to Tom, **** and Harry. There is a slight difference there.
Well, in that case, I will have to quote a pastor who gave the sermon where I accepted the free gift of salvation as an adult.As to the Scriptures being in error there is enough internal evidence that they were NOT written under any other inspiration but human
The only difference is the understanding of which saints we beleive we can ask to pray for us. You believe that once we die in Christ, we are separated from the rest of the body of Christ. We believe we are still one body through Christ. Nothing can separate us, even death, for we are alive in and through Christ.
No, I was not specifically referring to that verse.originally posted by justasking4
In your quote above, are you referring to Romans 8:38-39 which says–38 For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers,39 nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord?
What Paul is claiming here is that nothing can separate us from the love of God. It is not about some kind of communication (prayer) with the living and dead in Christ.
Yes, it was written for our benefit, for those of us here. And what was written, as well as was told, supports the communion of Saints as practiced by the Catholic Church.
The problem is that it does not support the practice of the Catholic Church. There is no communication going on between those who are alive here and those who have passed on.originally posted by justasking4
So because some do not do what they are supposed to do, who fall into superstitious practices while asking saints to pray for them, the practice of asking saints to pray for us is wrong? Is this what you are saying?
You are confusing different issues. The Catholic Church teaches that Christ is the only mediator between God and man, but just as Paul in one breath teaches this, but then asks others to pray for him, there is clearly a difference between praying for others, sometimes called intercessory prayer, and the unique intercession Christ does for us.Yes. The Scriptures never teach this. Christ is more than sufficent for your needs. He is our high priest and it is He alone who intecedes for us before the Father.
Why do you continually contradict scripture and refer to the saints in heaven as dead?It is right to ask other christians in this world to pray for each other. Scripture certainly confirms this. What it does not teach is asking the dead saints to help you. It may make sense to do so, but its not biblical.
Again, when are you going to stop contradicting scripture and calling those who are in heaven dead?None of the passages you use here demonstrate any idea of appealing to the dead for help. That is the issue.
As already stated, Catholic Christians do not pray to saints in heaven as if they were God.Yes. Praying to anyone but Christ and is something no Christian should ever do.
Indeed! Thanks for the clarification. Sometimes there is confusion in the way we use language.The New Catholic Encyclopedia, 1967, Vol. XI, p 670 acknowledges: Usually in the New Testament, – “all prayer, private as well as public liturgical prayer, is addressed to God the Father Through Christ.” … In this reference material, encouragement is given to pray for the saints…but not to them or through them.
I do. I would not be in the Catholic Church today if I had not been convinced of the absolute scriptural truth of the Catholic Church.Who cares if it is biblical–even though it is!
I hope you realize that all this prayer through Christ also includes requests for intercession from those who have gone to their rest before us.You may find the following passages of interest:
The New Catholic Encyclopedia, 1967, Vol. XI, p 670 acknowledges: Usually in the New Testament, – “all prayer, private as well as public liturgical prayer, is addressed to God the Father Through Christ.” … In this reference material, encouragement is given to pray for the saints…but not to them or through them.
So, do you also deny that Christ gives us a share in His ministry of intercession? Do you think that there is no such thing as a ministry of intercession?John 14: 6, 14 - “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one can come to the Father except through me.” – “If you ask for anything in my name (Jesus’ name), I will do it.” … intercession to be heard is through Christ Jesus alone.
I think you just misunderstand the use of the word “prayer” in this context. There is no difference in the way that the Christians in the NT were asking each other for prayers, and the way we do now, except that we ask some of our brothers and sisters for prayer who have already passed beyond the veil of flesh.1 Timothy 2:5 - “There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man Christ Jesus.”
Romans 8:34 - “Who is he that will condemn - Christ Jesus is the one who died yes, rather of the one who was raised up from the dead, who is on the right hand of God, who also pleads for us.”
Hebrews 7:25 - “Consequently he (Christ) is able also to save completely those who are approaching God through him, - because he is always alive to plead for them.”
In Romans 15:30 - The apostle Paul who himself was considered a saint asked his fellow Christians, to pray for him. "Now I exhort you, brothers, through our Lord Jesus Christ and through the love of the spirit, that you exert yourselves with me in prayers to God for me . . . . " - Jas. 5:16 also reminds us to pray for each other. But not to or through each other.
Dear Lord, I thank you for sending me such great examples in the faith, and for surrounding me with a “great cloud of witnesses”. In your mercy, grant that these who have gone before me in the hope of resurrection be empowered to intercede not only on my behalf, but on behalf of all those who sojourn yet in this vale of tears. Thank you for shedding your blood for us all on the cross, and opening the door of heaven to us. Amen.John 15:16 - “I appointed you to go on and keep bearing fruit and that your fruit should remain; in order that no matter what you ask the Father in my name (Jesus’ name) he “might” give it to you.”
A Reminder: John 16:23, 24 - “if you ask the Father for anything he will give it to you in my name (Jesus’ name). - Until now, you have not asked a single thing in my name. Ask and you will receive, that your joy may be made full.”
Amen! And He shares this way of reconciliation with us, so that we can also become ministers of reconciliation for one another.“Jesus Christ is therefore the one and only “way” of reconciliation with God and approach to God in prayer.” See Eph 2:16-18
Hi Selma KellyHi Maria … lovely name by the way. Yes, this is correct. Those in heaven and those on earth will never be separated because we are all the Body of Christ.
But just because we can’t be separated, doesn’t give us permission to “pray” to people gone on to heaven.
Again, Jesus said we are to pray only “to the Father” and onlly “In His Name”.
Miriam and the “saints” cannot give ACCESS to God because they did not EARN this right on the cross. So here are the TRUE instructions to prayer …
1st Tim 2:5: For there is ONE God and ONE Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus…
Ephs 2:18: For through Him we have ACCESS by one Spirit to the Father.
John 14:14: Ask anything in MY NAME and I will do it.
I wish you a Proverbs 10:22 day.
Selma Kelly.
The first question is:
Before you make yourself seem to silly with a response to my response that I can already imagine brewing…skelly123 and all those others who are reading this thread with questions about praying to saints…,
The problem, as I have repeated to the day time people, is not wether or not the Catholic interpretation is scripturally defensible, but why you choose the doctrine that you do.
The first question is:
When we die are we judged?
Or
Are we judged sometime later?
(I’d rather you not evade the question…)
I guess I asked that wrong…:yup:
:yup:
You are making the fallacious assumption that simply because the Bible doesn’t speak directly on one topic, that the early Church did not believe in it.
The issue is: do the Scriptures teach us to pray to the saints. As i’ve said and shown there is no such exhortation in scripture to do so. This tells us the NT church did not since we have no record in scripture for the claim. Now, if what you mean by the “early church” after the apostles died, then maybe they did. That would not mean though it was to be considered scripture.
The Bible never claims to be the sole organized compilation of all Christian dogma; rather, the Bible affirms oral traditions. (2 Thessalonians 2:15)