The Trinity and Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter scapularkid8
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
it did sink from reading the quote. Does it sink in to you that as the Word of Allah, it is Allah, but as ink and paper, it is not?
The Qur’an is NOT Allah.

Don’t you get that? Stop saying it is. It’s NOT.
 
So are we ending this because you cannot accept the overwhelming evidence that God has the Need to Act?
There is no evidence to suggest that.

Christians don’t believe God has multiple personalities, for one.
Secondly, you said that one personality has to be dominant which would mean that the three in the trinity couldn’t be equal by that analogy.
Thirdly, there is no proof at all that God needs anything. The existence of the universe doesn’t prove it, because God created the universe and doesn’t necessarily need to abide by its rules.

Plus, you said that something would be dormant, like a rock. But God created rocks. Do rocks need to act?

Seriously, there is no evidence at all, and I’m just kind of playing with you here. You have no logic, as I’ve refuted your premises.

So we can stop if you want, resting on the conclusion that trinity is not a logical conclusion if one assumes the existence of God. Only “ONE” and absolute “UNITY” is logical.
 
The Qur’an is NOT Allah.

Don’t you get that? Stop saying it is. It’s NOT.
the creed differentiates between the Quran **AS A BOOK OF INK AND PAPER **and the Quran AS THE ETERNAL WORD OF ALLAH.
The Quran as a book is NOT Allah. The Quran AS THE WORD of Allah IS Allah.
Clearer now? if not, then maybe you can tell me what does it mean that the Quran is not Allah, yet it is uncreated and eternal? does it mean you believe in 2 different uncreated and eternal entities?
 
the creed differentiates between the Quran **AS A BOOK OF INK AND PAPER **and the Quran AS THE ETERNAL WORD OF ALLAH.
The Quran as a book is NOT Allah. The Quran AS THE WORD of Allah IS Allah.
Clearer now? if not, then maybe you can tell me what does it mean that the Quran is not Allah, yet it is uncreated and eternal? does it mean you believe in 2 different uncreated and eternal entities?
The Qur’an is not Allah.

The Qur’an is the Word of Allah.

But the Qur’an is NOT Allah.

There’s no use in moving forward until you can grasp this essential point.🤷
 
.

So we can stop if you want, resting on the conclusion that trinity is not a logical conclusion if one assumes the existence of God. Only “ONE” and absolute “UNITY” is logical.
back to the question you do not want to discuss.

One is logical, ok. How come Allah and His Word are One is logical in Islam but illogical in Christianity? or are Allah and His uncreated Word 2 in Islam?
 
back to the question you do not want to discuss.

One is logical, ok. How come Allah and His Word are One is logical in Islam but illogical in Christianity? or are Allah and His uncreated Word 2 in Islam?
This is you, trying to impose a non-islamic teaching on Islam.

The Qur’an is NOT Allah. So don’t say they are “one,” because they aren’t the same.
 
In jesus, we dont take God or his wisdom and will to be a different entity, we dont talk or speak or think of them as anything except for God.

We dont describe them as three, we dont speak of them as different entities…

YOU DO…

You either talk about God (so called father), then Jesus the so called son, (who strangely happens to be God himself)… then some third entity called the spirit, which you identify as a different entity to God and Jesus…

You then make strange statements…

like the other day I stated WHY would God want a man (jesus) tortured, humiliated and brutally killed to forgive the sins of other people…

So many Christians then reply, by saying that God did not want jesus to be killed or slaughtered,
Jesus CHOSE TO BE BRUTALLY KILLED SO, GOD WOULD FORGIVE HUMANITY

But if you call jesus God, then that means God wanted HIMSELF brutally slaughtered by humans, so he could then forgive humanity

it all goes around in a circle where you keep talking of God as 3 different entities and then the same entity in the same sentence.

Its confusing, because it makes NO sense.
 
There is no evidence to suggest that.
God’s product: the Universe, is the overwhelming evidence that you refuse to see.
Christians don’t believe God has multiple personalities, for one.
They would resist the term for its negative medical implications, but its technically the same thing.
Secondly, you said that one personality has to be dominant which would mean that the three in the trinity couldn’t be equal by that analogy.
In the doctrine of the Trinity, all 3 persons are the same in essence. But each differs in rank: Like Jesus always submits to the will of the Father. Agree? 👍
Thirdly, there is no proof at all that God needs anything. The existence of the universe doesn’t prove it, because God created the universe and doesn’t necessarily need to abide by its rules.
who said about abiding by its rules? what about looking at it in reverse? life abides by gods natural need to act. this is a jewish concept, that we reflect some of god’s attributes. because according to them, when God BREATHED life into adam & eve, he imparted some of his spirit into humanity.
Plus, you said that something would be dormant, like a rock. But God created rocks. Do rocks need to act?
oh my goodness. i’m just using the rock’s attributes to prove my point.
Seriously, there is no evidence at all, and I’m just kind of playing with you here. You have no logic, as I’ve refuted your premises.
no, all you did is play blind. you cant open your mind to reason if it means giving the trinity a chance. because you cannot overcome your biases.
 
Meh.

here’s your argument:

God exists.
the universe exists.
therefore God needed to create it.

my argument:

God exists.
the universe exists.
therefore God created it.

you haven’t shown NEED.
 
ok i’ll go with you step by step. So the Quran is not Allah.
Very nice.
If the Quran is not Allah, then the UNCREATED AND ETERNAL Quran is another entity beside Allah.
The Qur’an is not an “entity.”

]quote]the Quran is NOT Allah AS A BOOK
The Quran is Allah as HIS UNCREATED WORD.
Repeat after me: The Qur’an is NOT ALLAH. The Word of Allah is NOT ALLAH. It is HIS WORD. NOT HIM.
Otherwise, 2 different entities being eternal and uncreated are 2 Gods.
Repeating: the Qur’an is not an entity. The Qur’an is not Allah.
 
Meh.

here’s your argument:

God exists.
the universe exists.
therefore God needed to create it.

my argument:

God exists.
the universe exists.
therefore God created it.

you haven’t shown NEED.
My argument actually revolves around yours:

God created the Universe therefore he exhibited a Need to Act.

You have yet to show an argument that contradicts that.

The religious belief that God created & continues to create different worlds further proves my point.
 
My argument actually revolves around yours:

God created the Universe therefore he exhibited a Need to Act.

You have yet to show an argument that contradicts that.
Here is an argument that contradicts yours.

“God did not “need” to act.”

I am touching my nose right now… does that mean I “need” to touch my nose?
 
Here is an argument that contradicts yours.

“God did not “need” to act.”
and your evidence to back that up?
I am touching my nose right now… does that mean I “need” to touch my nose?
Not the actual need to touch your nose. But you do need to do something. you cant just stay still. you cant just remain dormant. you need to act.
 
and your evidence to back that up?
God existed eternally, and the universe has not. The fact that God created the universe didn’t demonstrate a “need” to do anything. You’re the one who needs evidence to back up your statement. Why is “need” a factor?
Not the actual need to touch your nose. But you do need to do something. you cant just stay still. you cant just remain dormant. you need to act.
I am not God.
 
God existed eternally, and the universe has not.
Thats like trying to stay still for as long as you can, but eventually must make a move.
The fact that God created the universe didn’t demonstrate a “need” to do anything.
so why did god create the universe? whats the point of being omnipotent if there is nothing to show for it? doing something is something that God had to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top