B
Babaganoush
Guest
Nathan Phillips was a bully and deference to him would have only been capitulation to a bully.
And I disagree in return.I disagree with your whole premise about how they should defer or a certain respect is owed to the elder.
That is true. There used to be more respect but elders used to also act more respectfully. Mr. Phillips did not show any respect toward that young man or anyone of the other youth but the young man was polite despite of Mr. Phillips disrespect of others.It used to be common that young people would open a door, or give up a seat on the bus for elders.
That assessment of the need for deescalation is not unreasonable, but it is not the only reasonable assessment. I think that this talk of invading people’s personal space, (or bullying or getting in the face) is not a reasonable characterization of the interaction of the elder and childrenYet look who goes around invading people’s personal space to deescalate some school cheers in a situation that did not need to be deescalated.
This never happened , so what its the point?I am however trying to picture your perfect deescalation technique where Nathan Phillips, the peaceful deescalator, chases a bunch of kids around the Lincoln Memorial as they try to “defer” to him by getting out of his way and he tries to deescalate the situation by attempting to get close enough to pray in their personal space with a drum.
I think that they were accused of being disrespectful and engaging in mockery of native Americans. I think taht there is good evidence for it.these kids, in particular the smiling kid Nathan Sandmann, were accused of seeking out, harassing, and verbally insulting Nathan Phillips
I have no sympathy for this mob, but that does not exculpate the kids and chaperones.A virtual lynch mob
Definitely not homophobic, from what I saw. I won’t comment on the other, because it is clear that here at CAF the word has no common meaning.So tell me, are these kids, the school, and their families raving homophobic racists?
Should they all have their lives destroyed? Should they at the minimum be expelled?
No and No.
I think that you miss the point of the our past sense of manners. This respect of elders was not negotiated or contingent. If an elder were out of line, there were appropriate remedies. But refusal of respect on the part of children was not one of them.There used to be more respect but elders used to also act more respectfully
I understand that but the point is, Nick Sandman did remain polite and respectful. He said absolutely nothing disrespectful. He stood there and did what he thought was the polite thing to do. He turned around at times and kept others from being disrespectful also, as can be seen in the videos.I think that you miss the point of the our past sense of manners. This respect of elders was not negotiated or contingent. If an elder were out of line, there were appropriate remedies. But refusal of respect on the part of children was not one of them.
That requires reading his mind or accepting his crafted statement at face value. Others have interpretedNick Sandman did remain polite and respectful.
That again is a matter of interpretation.Mr. Phillips and the crowd jumping around and following him were disrespectful to those young children …
They can be. Yes. For example, or Catholic school does not allow politically controversial attire when representing the school or the faith. And was it smiling, or smirking, or maybe trying to keep from laughing? Either way, it was still a restrained response, but that doesn’t mean there is no room for criticism. I surely would never second guess a teenager for being a teenager.Wearing a hat, smiling in the face of people accosting you, and attending a March for Life are actions worthy of criticism?
This is something no one has said - a straw man.It was actually student, not students, and I’m not sure how one student’s inappropriate comment excuses death threats against other Covington students,
While it is true I can not read his mind I can tell you by watching his actions, which speak louder than words, he was being respectful and polite.That requires reading his mind or accepting his crafted statement at face value. Others have interpreted his posture as defiance.
So, was I, but I was also instructed to obey my teachers and parents first and foremost.The kids should have deferred to the adult. That is the way that I was reared.
Barack Obama is a Christian.And don’t be surprised if the pagan left wants to idolize him. Imagine how Obama would be fawning all over him by now.