This Wednesday, 8/6/2008, I will be leaving communion with the Roman Catholic Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christy74
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
she’ll be back!! LOL we may not know it, but she will sneak back and read some threads. LOL
I concur. She didn’t delete herself.

Oi! I can see it now, she’ll come back to tell us how awesome it was to be recieved into the Orthodox Church and how much more holy and spiritual she feels now that it’s been formalized and she never got this from the Heretical Catholic Church… AND, she’ll come up with a reason, trying to put somebody else on the defensive why she is back…when really, she doesn’t owe anybody an explination…

Well, here’s hoping she asks her Bishop to write a letter to Rome asking when is Rome going to give up Her heresies. I just think she’ll get a better answer if she asks the Church of Rome than an online forum.

This was a fun thread.
 
LOL that is funny!! hopefully, she won’t come back with her tail between her legs! he he he!!
 
Again, Christy, God bless you on your journey!

Christy and Isa Almisry,
I hate to infiltrate this thread, but I began a thread a few days called “Sacrament of Reconciliation”
I was wondering if one or both of you could reply to it.
I am sure by now it has gone a couple pages back, but if you do not mind I would greatly appreciate it.

I have enjoyed reading what you both have been teaching me about the Orthodox faith! I said a while back that I visited my uncle for Easter at his Greek Orthodox Church which bares the name The Assumption.(Looking forward to the Feast!) I fell in love with the liturgy! Christy, I can understand why you are in love with the Orthodox Church.

The seven sacraments put us so close to Christ that people have no idea until they experience them! (Well…I cannot say I have experienced anointing of the sick, nor holy orders, nor matrimony, but I think you get my point.)
Done. I had to be quick, I’m taking the boys out. I hope to return.
Traditionally, the priest does not say “I absolve you” (in has been inserted in some areas). There is a prayer during confession which the priest says "I have no power to forgive sins, but God alone, but by that divine word which Christ spoke to the Apostles “Receive the Holy Spirit, those whose sins you forgive…I declare to you…”

“O Lord our God, who didst remit the sins of Peter and the harlot through their tears, and didst justify the Publican who acknowledged his iniquities: Accept Thou the confession of Thy servant N., and overlook his (her) sins whether voluntary or involuntary, by word or by deed, or thought. Forgive him, O Thou art good and lovest mankind, for Thou alone hast power to remit sins, and unto Thee we ascribe glory, together with Thine unoriginate Father and Thine all-holy and good and life-giving Spirit, now and ever, and unto ages of ages. Amen”

“God it was who forgave David through Nathan the Prophet, when he confessed his sins, and Peter weeping bitterly for his denial, and the sinful woman in tears at His feet, and the Publican, and the Prodigal Son: May that same God forgive thee all things, through me a sinner, both in this present world and in that which is to come, and set thee uncondemned before His fearful Judgment Seat. And now, having no further care for the sins which thouhast declared, depart in peace.”
Btw, it is usual for everyone to receive anointing of the sick on Great and Holy Wednesday.

I take my children every first Friday to the Romanian Church (there mother is Romanian, and I want them to keep good impressions of their heritage, if not their mother) when they have the Unction service.
 
I take my children every first Friday to the Romanian Church (there mother is Romanian, and I want them to keep good impressions of their heritage, if not their mother) when they have the Unction service.
drools …What’s that like, the Romanian Church? How’s that different?

AND, what is it like, you being one branch of one religion and your wife being another? Do your children understand? Looking forward to your reply when you get back!
 
ORTHODOXY: MY IMPRESSION
Code:
 **It's not my intention to attack any other religion b**ecause 'different strokes like different strokes'. One tradition may draw Jack to Christ while another draws Jill to Christ.  As for judging, I'll leave that up to God. Besides, I believe Jesus had something to say about judging.

  Let me note that I have been to Orthodox churches on various occasions. Forgive me if I speak the truth re my experiences. To begin with, **the music is impressive though I much prefer hymns that everyone sings **- the more exuberant (and in English) the better. 

  Then, I have trouble with the **kissing of all those icons.** **Strikes me as unhygienic.** Sorry, but that's how it strikes me.

   In the third place, the **liturgy is just too incompatible with my simple tastes when it comes to ritual**. The priest kept disappearing behind the screen and most of the time seemed quite removed from the congregation. Perhaps impressive theater but it impressed me more as a priest-featured show than as a community of fellow Christians involved together in worship.

   Finally, the **Orthodox priests that I've met - well, not all, but most - seem to be so exclusive**. All Catholics and Protestants are wrong, and only they have the truth, are the true church, preach the full gospel, etc. Insulting and alienating. It seems that the converts often are the worse, as frequently is the case.

   I say: God isn't interested in our church affiliation or even our fine points of doctrine. **Humble and grateful faith in Christ and a genuine effort to live a life of service to Him and humanity are ****what God wants from us**. The rest may inspire, although it sometimes can seem like so much pompous and useless ceremony. See Micah 6:8, Amos 5:21-24, and Luke 10:25-37.
 
drools …What’s that like, the Romanian Church? How’s that different?

AND, what is it like, you being one branch of one religion and your wife being another? Do your children understand? Looking forward to your reply when you get back!
As their mother and I are divorced, that’s not a problem.

Mom got tossed out (father confessor told her that if he had to leave the altar at the consecration to escort her out personally, he’d do so). When the divorce went through (usually there’s a year’s penance afterward of automatic excommunication) the priest told me to come to communion if I wanted that Sunday, as I “had done enough penance.” So it gives you an idea about how that was.

Mom went to the Romanian Church (an canonical no no, as she was under Church discipline), but went through two parishes. She ended up at Willow Creek (a mega church here), which the boys refer to as “the Church where we don’t pray.” Once, my older one (at the time 7) asked if people like his friend Ben (goes to a Latin Church) have icons. “Yes,” I said, “other people have icons. But some don’t, like grandma” (my mother is still nominally Lutheran). "And like mama’s church. They don’t have a cross. Why not? (the pastor, using marketing methods, which he repented of last year, said that the church doesn’ have a cross because it turns people off and is a downer). “Because they think it makes people sad,” I said. He paused for while, looking very pensive, then he exclaimed “tsk! and they called that a Church. It’s not a Church, it’s a mall.” Out of the mouth of babes…

Besides that, there’s not much to tell. We have some Romanias who come to our Church, I go to the Arab Church often enough, where they had a Romanian monk who was caretaker to the weeping icon, and who was deeply loved and missed by the Arabs, we go to Greek Churches on occasion (for instance on Great and Holy Wednesday they have an early unction service which fits in for visitation). While we are there the boys see a lot of their classmates. Beside our Church being all in English (it started as a Bible study at Wheaton College: the priest always jokes that the Almisry boys will complain that they didn’t understand a thing because it was in English), the Arab Church being half in Arabic (the boys and I normally pray in Arabic), the Greek Church being half in Greek (I tell them this is the language of the NT) and the Romanian Church being all in Romanian (the Church is actually the Patriarchal Cathedral for the ROC in America: interesting, the semon is usually given, all in Romanian, by an American priest who had gone to Romania as a Baptist missionary. Things didn’t go according to plan.😃 ), they don’t see much difference. Even when go to the Coptic Church (“the Church that speaks mummy”😛 ), nothing different. The only major thing has been they are interesting in the stories of the icons, as usually these are different. When we went to the New Gratian monestery (Serbian) in Libertyville, we had to go around the entire Church and see all the different saints on the walls (the Church is large and covered top to bottom. If you are nearby definitely see it: it’s gorgious) and their stories. My younger son was thrilled to see over 7 icons of his patron, St. Stephen. They’ve communed in all of them so that’s not an issue. They will NOT commune in Willow Creek, nor buy the line that is sold there, though they will comment that “they got this right…they got that right.” When I showed our antimensis to them, my one son said “mama’s Church of course doesn’t have one. They don’t have half of what we got.”

Their grandmother is still Romanian Orthodox, and I try to expose them to as many Romanian Orthodox as possible, but they only notice a difference in language. And food, more cabbage at the Romanian Church.😛

They did notice a difference when we went to the Western Rite Orthodox (I go for moral support: I’m a big supporter of the WRO), but that was basically that they had musical instruments (which they questioned if that was proper), the Eucharist was different (they’re not used to wafers, or even the flat leavened loaves), and the rubrics were somewhat different. But otherwise, they treated it as any other Orthodox Church.

I might add, my one son is especially aware of differences. When he was 2, when he saw a Church on TV, would stand up and cross himself.🙂 Once, when the TV was showing the Unitarian Church Frank Lloyd Wright built, he didn’t notice anything Church like about it. Out of the mouths of babes… At age 8 he critiqued the sermon at Willow Creek that was comparing evolution, creationism and the omphalic argument (the universe was created “old”).

Back to your first question: the Romanian Church is unique in that all its liturgical language is modern and up to date. The Patriarchate updates the translations periodically. The Romanians kneel more, and still have the big to do with memorial services (the Arab clergy have toned that down, and the converts never had it before, so have a natural WASP sense of restraint). And given the nature of the language, is sounds like Italian with a Russian Accent.

Oh, and by the way: they like Fr. Corapi and Fr. Larry Richards. I listen to a lot of Relevant Radio. They do notice the East/West difference: once, when Fr. Loya’s show “Light of the East” came on (usually we are in Church then, but this Sunday we were going to a friend’s church. Btw. Fr. Loyo’s Church in part is made up of parishinors which share a common history with the parish where I converted to Orthodoxy) they immediately exclaimed “that’s our music!”
 
If the Catholic Church is heretical and one knows it, isn’t one obligated to leave asap?
I stopped taking communion for over one year as I discerned a move from Papal Catholicism to Holy Orthodoxy, after that I became a catechumen, which required more waiting and formal guided study. I think it was almost a two year process altogether for me.

For some eastern Catholics, preparation and reception into Orthodoxy can go rather quickly, but that is dependent upon the judgment of the local pastor and his bishop.

Michael
 
Quote

Christy

Thank you Catholic Answers, especially the Eastern Catholic Forum, for leading me back out of communion with the Roman Church and into communion with the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church aka the Orthodox Churches!

I am so happy and relieved to be joining the true historical Church which has been protected by the Holy Spirit which has prevented it from teaching error for the last couple thousand years. The Roman Church has not had such a protection which can be seen clearly with the doctrines it has come up with in the last several hundred years since the Church of Rome removed herself from union with the Churches established by the Apostles.

Thank you!

My Quote

Right On !!!

I would like to say Welcome on board.
 
Look at the second one.
It makes me chuckle when Roman Catholics try to say that the Orthodox are ticked off at St Peter----because we do not accept the odd 1870 doctrine of supremacy/infallibility. 🤷
 
Hence, since the Orthodox contracept against Peter and the Filioque
Oh brother. :rolleyes:
  1. There is a great feast day (SS Peter and Paul) in the Orthodox Church preceded by a three week fast.
  2. Filioque is a Western innovation.
 
They are stuck in history because they do not have The Holy Spirit to make sure whatever the pronounce is not pronounced in error.
Wow! You are claiming that the Holy Orthodox Church does not have the Holy Spirit!?! That is a dangerous statement. I will pray for you.
 
You’ve separated yourself from Christ’s true church and, IMO, hence from Christ Himself.
There’s the arrogance that TriuneUnity was speaking about. Are you making a judgement that Christy has separated herself from Christ? This is a dangerous statement also. I will pray for you.
 
Besides that, there’s not much to tell. We have some Romanias who come to our Church, I go to the Arab Church often enough, where they had a Romanian monk who was caretaker to the weeping icon, and who was deeply loved and missed by the Arabs, we go to Greek Churches on occasion (for instance on Great and Holy Wednesday they have an early unction service which fits in for visitation).
Bravo Isa!
I am OCA with Ukrainian background. I like to pilgrimage to the ROCOR monastery at Jordanville and the Romanian Orthodox monastery. And Bible study is at the Greek Orthodox monastery. 🙂
 
The Dormition and Assumption are slightly different but can refer to the same thing. Assumption according to Rome means that Mary was taken into Heaven, Body and Soul prior to her physical death. This is not what it means in Orthodoxy.
What the doctrine says is “at the end of her terrestrial life, Mary was asumed in heaven in her body as well as in her soul” (my translation might be slightly awkward, but I hope you understand!) and whether she was alive or dead at the time, it doesn’t say! True, in our Church some believe Mary didn’t die, but some do believe that she did. So, that point is left to speculation…

Orthodox have a strong Tradition of what happened to Mary both before she ever conceived Christ and after Christ’s Death, Ressurrection and Ascension.

To keep it short and sweet. At the end of her life all of the Apostles, except St. Thomas were miraculous taken to her bedside. They were all able to say their goodbyes, etc. Then she died peacefully. They buried her. After her burial, St. Thomas was miraculously brought to the same place. He was informed of her death. He was overwhelmed with grief and insisted on having the grave opened so he could see her one last time. They opened the grave and discovered that she had been taken into Heaven with her body.

This is what is believed in Orthodox and Eastern Catholic Churches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top